Started By
Message

re: The High Cost of a Home Is Turning American Millennials Into the New Serfs

Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:34 am to
Posted by SECretariat
Member since Jun 2015
339 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:34 am to
Thought of the day: Buy an old one.

This "thought" shows that you haven't moved recently or live in an area that's an aberration...

WHAT older houses? You mean the one that 5 corporate "buy and flippers" offer cash for the day it hits the market? Or the old, outdated one in a great area that is torn down because the land it worth more without a house.

So many people are in here spouting nonsense without having actually broken from their daily life pattern to see what it's really like out there. Buying a starter home with student loan debt is a real problem right now for young professionals in many different areas of the country. Their debt limits purchasing power ... combined with low housing turnover from baby boomers = more renters for the foreseeable future.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:40 am to
I can't believe anyone would argue that houses built in the '50's aren't being torn down for more expensive houses.

Hell that's happening in neighborhoods where the median home value is well over $300k, a decent neighborhood (or even not so decent) where home values are sub $200k is like a wet dream for these folks.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16624 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Those holes are the ones where the price has outpaced what they were in 1980.


In a handful of markets which is why the data you are hanging your argument is junk.

quote:

Thanks for telling us about your area. It is completely irrelevant to the conversation and doesn't change a thing about the overall data.


My area, Birmingham, Memphis, Philadelpia, and everywhere else I've lived and worked. Your problem is you only have your data and zero context to go with it. I can read the same data and also apply personal experience of having worked on homes and residential remodels in those areas. Someday when you really grow up and stop being the usual idiotic Google-has-all-my-answers millennial you'll understand why just citing data you had no hand in compiling and no real experience to interpret in depth is never going to make an intelligent argument.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95879 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:50 am to
quote:

EVeryone is doing it my hood.

Mine too. My house value as gone crazy in the two years since I have lived here in the Ridge. My realtor called the other day and said we should do an off market listing.

People are buying up these homes and building huge arse houses.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:51 am to
quote:

In a handful of markets which is why the data you are hanging your argument is junk.


Which markets do you think this data is derived from?

quote:

Your problem is you only have your data and zero context to go with it.


I mean no context is better than an assertion that no one in Philadelphia is tearing down 1950's houses.

quote:

Someday when you really grow up and stop being the usual idiotic Google-has-all-my-answers millennial you'll understand why just citing data you had no hand in compiling and no real experience to interpret in depth is never going to make an intelligent argument.


Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

My area, Birmingham, Memphis, Philadelpia, and everywhere else I've lived and worked. Your problem is you only have your data and zero context to go with it. I can read the same data and also apply personal experience of having worked on homes and residential remodels in those areas. Someday when you really grow up and stop being the usual idiotic Google-has-all-my-answers millennial you'll understand why just citing data you had no hand in compiling and no real experience to interpret in depth is never going to make an intelligent argument.


You just argued that people aren't tearing down 1950s homes. I can drive down the street and watch people tear down 1950s homes. I don't need google to enlighten me that you are rejecting reality.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:59 am to
Also I can link any number of newspaper articles about tearing down starter houses. They come from newspapers all across the country.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84275 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Someday when you really grow up and stop being the usual idiotic Google-has-all-my-answers millennial you'll understand why just citing data you had no hand in compiling and no real experience to interpret in depth is never going to make an intelligent argument.


This is all the proof we need that you're fricking clueless.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:10 am to
quote:


Also I can link any number of newspaper articles about tearing down starter houses. They come from newspapers all across the country


Doesn't matter. He's been to Memphis, Birmingham, AND Philadelphia.
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:11 am to
quote:

GreatLakesTiger24


The hilarious part of the article is that it literally talks about only one side of the coin. There is no discussion about the actual cost of home ownership. The interest rates, monthly payments, appraised value. None of that is discussed.

It's a gap in the discussion it attempts to frame so wide you could drive a big-rig 18-wheeler through it.

Millenials all want to live in high-cost-of-ownership areas and that creates and drives an unreasonable demand in those areas. Meanwhile it is a boon to the upward mobility of people in suburban and rural areas as it provides-albeit more gentle-downward pressure on home ownership costs from a home price perspective. Lesser demand from that tranche of the demographic of potential homeowners helps to create that downward pressure.

It creates an affluence in rural and suburban areas, and the tools of the Federal Government to increase rural and non-urban tax bases (USDA Rural Development Loans) that offer 100% financing options reduce the cost of entry to home ownership for many young families in what Millenials would consider, "The country."

None of that is even considered or discussed. A total Millenial way of discussing an issue: leaving out a raft of context to simply focus on what they think-and are too ignorant to realize are wrong about-is the only part that matters: THEM.
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 11:12 am
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
66461 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:11 am to
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
66461 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:13 am to
Let me guess, you're also going to argue that the cost of home ownership hasn't outpaced income....
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Millenials all want to live in high-cost-of-ownership areas and that creates and drives an unreasonable demand in those areas. Meanwhile it is a boon to the upward mobility of people in suburban and rural areas


Studies have shown more millennials are buying in the suburbs than anywhere else.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:22 am to
This will obviously be anecdotal but the map of where workers at my company live easily shows that milennials are in the suburbs. It is actually the Gen X'ers who have taken advantage of the crazy appreciation in the housing market to buy more expensive homes closer in to the city,
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Mingo Was His NameO


quote:

Studies have shown more millennials are buying in the suburbs than anywhere else.


They're buying in the suburbs of major metropolitan areas. The ancillary "bump," that those metro area's corresponding suburbs receive as a result of the untenable home prices within the urban areas isn't what I'm talking about.

Throwing in The Top 25 Best Suburbs of Tampa, FL is incredibly misleading and skews the context of what I'm saying as well as the frame of the debate.

Before we go around and around I think we need to figure out whether you agree with me on that point. If not I'm fairly certain neither of us will mind saving ourselves the time of trying to convince each other of anything else as the discussion is pretty pointless.
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 11:26 am
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39599 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:33 am to
quote:

They're buying in the suburbs of major metropolitan areas.


Maybe I'm a dumbass but isn't that the definition of "suburb"?

Otherwise, you merely just live in a small town or city*.

*Suburbs are outlying districts of "cities", but I don't think we should confuse a city like Lafayette with a real city like Dallas, and I think the definition of suburb implies a larger metro.
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 11:36 am
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:36 am to
Do I think high urban prices are raising the prices of homes in the suburbs as well? Sure, that's a piece of it. I don't think that's all millennials fault they. The economy now dictates that you have to live in an urban area to have upward mobility. For me for example, I didn't necessarily want to move to a metro area, but the salary difference between there and my hometown was just too substantial. I know that's anecdotal (which I've been shitting on) but that reflects the overall shift.
Posted by dabigfella
Member since Mar 2016
6687 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:37 am to
Millenials can easily live in the suburbs, nobody is forcing them to live in city centers. In Houston a 5000 sq ft lot in west university is $600k for the land, that same lot 25 miles north in humble is like $50-100k. Nobody is forcing them to live inside the city. Ideally, yes its nicer, but there is still a ton of affordable housing. I own alot of rental homes in 77060 which is basically greenspoint mall area, its awful, but there are 1500-2000 sq ft townhomes for $60-80k and thats 15-20 minutes from downtown.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16624 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:51 am to
quote:

You just argued that people aren't tearing down 1950s homes. I can drive down the street and watch people tear down 1950s homes. I don't need google to enlighten me that you are rejecting reality.


I can drive down the street and see For Sale signs on 1950's houses for under $120k. I worked on a remodel of a 1930's home in a north-west Philly area that was purchased for $80k and there were 4 others in the same block all under $100k. Reality is that too many millennials are too stupid and too lazy to work on such things (oh but they tell themselves they are the smartest generation yet). They want instant gratification and can't be bothered to set aside the little pleasures for something of real value that is 10+ years of effort and investment away. For every one of your examples I have 10 of mine, I work in this business, I talk with Realtors, I look for homes worth investing in for rental or flipping for myself and for others. But you kids do what you want to do and make all the excuses you want...
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95879 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:53 am to
quote:

I can drive down the street and see For Sale signs on 1950's houses for under $120k
Here is your under 120k inventory here in Metarie. It is shite. Not starter home, shite home



LINK
Jump to page
Page First 25 26 27 28 29
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 27 of 29Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram