Started By
Message

re: The High Cost of a Home Is Turning American Millennials Into the New Serfs

Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:54 am to
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29453 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:54 am to
quote:

a 1930's home in a north-west Philly area that was purchased for $80k

Be honest, how much work did this house need to make it livable?
Posted by TigerCoon
Member since Nov 2005
18883 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 12:48 pm to
Did this really happen?
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Mingo Was His NameO

quote:

For me for example, I didn't necessarily want to move to a metro area, but the salary difference between there and my hometown was just too substantial. I know that's anecdotal (which I've been shitting on) but that reflects the overall shift.


The Bureau of Labor Statistics did a study where they showed that while you earned more than your rural counterparts in income, you spend a third of that on increased housing costs, and also had higher food costs also. You also spend 30%+ more than your rural counterparts and in a sense, the increased costs actually almost totally negate the income increase you experienced.

LINK

When your rural counterpart doesn't have to pony up the 20% down payment thanks to USDA's Rural Development Loan, and gets the exact same interest rate you do, he also has more of his discretionary income free to spend on other things while you're focused on saving a down payment.

In fact, he can finance up to 102% of the appraised price (not the purchase price on a conventional loan that would be one of your only options in an urban area) itself. That caveat of the loan from a programmatic standpoint gives a rural borrower and potential homeowner much more soft, forgivable terms and frees up his income by comparison to someone who has to finance higher amounts and save more in order to have the privilege.

As I said, I think the stats bear out that the difference in income is offset by higher cost of food, living and home ownership by comparison, and the enticements with favorable loan programs like USDA RD Loans eliminate those "hard math," cost differentials altogether IMO.
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 1:15 pm
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 1:23 pm to
I mean your assumptions there are a bit suspect. There are certainly CoL benefits to being in the rural area. On the whole more income, even with a high CoL is better since you can manipulate expenses downward much easier than you can manipulate salary upwards.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55813 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 1:58 pm to
Millennial Americans Are Moving to the 'Burbs, Buying Big SUVs

quote:

Americans aged about 18 to 34 have become the largest group of homebuyers, and almost half live in the suburbs, according to Zillow Group data. As they shop for bigger homes to accommodate growing families, they’re upsizing their vehicles to match. U.S. industry sales of large SUVs have jumped 11 percent in the first half of the year, Ford Motor Co. estimates, compared with increases of 9 percent for midsize and 4 percent for small SUVs.


quote:

The shift to suburbia may surprise those who’ve chided millennials for being more interested in pricey avocado toast than in saving for a home. Much of the generation delayed marriage, childbearing and home ownership after graduating with heaping student-loan debt and entering a weak job market. As more millennials overcome this, many want the life of their baby-boomer parents -- the kids, the house in the ’burbs and the beefy SUV.

Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

The Bureau of Labor Statistics did a study where they showed that while you earned more than your rural counterparts in income, you spend a third of that on increased housing costs, and also had higher food costs also. You also spend 30%+ more than your rural counterparts and in a sense, the increased costs actually almost totally negate the income increase you experienced.



Let's say those other costs are 20 or even 30%, that's still 40-50% higher income compared to rural areas. That's a significant portion. For myself, my starting pay was probably in the 10-15k higher range so that's minimum 5 grand I'd be giving up.

quote:

In fact, he can finance up to 102% of the appraisedprice (not the purchase price on a conventional loan that would be one of your only options in an urban area) itself. That caveat of the loan from a programmatic standpoint gives a rural borrower and potential homeowner much more soft, forgivable terms and frees up his income by comparison to someone who has to finance higher amounts and save more in order to have the privilege. 


I'm not saying this is incorrect, hut what is the percentage of people that would realistically choose where to live by the way they can finance their house? It's really just a "bonus." You can't expect people to choose their location based on that.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Here is your under 120k inventory here in Metarie. It is shite. Not starter home, shite home



120K gets you a house in Kennairie with laminate floors and smelly carpet that hasn't been updated since the first moon landing. It's not even worth renovating.

Plus if you polish a turd and every other house gets torn down and replaced eventually, you'll be stuck with the hood's ugly duckling that no one wants to buy 10 years from now when you're ready to upgrade.
Posted by lnomm34
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2009
12616 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Welcome to the OT, home of anecdotal data.

Data: People who score less than a 24 on the ACT tend not to finish college.


There is also the fact that a 30 on the ACT is the 95th percentile and surprisingly anytime a thread about ACT scores rolls around, no one on the OT has scored lower than 30.


For the record, I scored a 30.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
66461 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:16 pm to
So a jump in SUV purchases for six months means millennial are spoiled. Solid statistic there.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

So a jump in SUV purchases for six months means millennial are spoiled. Solid statistic there.


I'm so tired of hearing that millenials are spoiled. Millenials with rich parents are spoiled. Everyone else is screwed. It's a pretty important distinction.

Yes, we all have iPhones. The prior generation had small block v8 mustangs and camaros. Get over it.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:28 pm to
I scored a 29

Posted by Tigerfan56
Member since May 2010
10520 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

This is what happens when you grow up being told that you're a winner (even when you lose) and can do anything you want in life, sky is the limit.


Millenials couldn't even parent themselves correctly!!!!
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:36 pm to
It's crazy how different it is from state to state.

In Louisville, KY, $250k will get you a 3100 sq. ft. home with a finished walk out basement, wood floors, granite entry ways and counter tops, gas fireplace, 2 tier deck, and many other amenities in a closed beautiful neighborhood surrounded by the same for miles.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:37 pm to
What you expect to live a normal life in addition to owning a home? Let me tell you that no one in my generation had a single minute of fun until they hit 40. Creature comforts? We fricking slept on the floor and stared at rocks for entertainment I tell you!

How dare you expect to be able to eat a meal out and own a house. Restaurants didn't even exist until 1995 you know!!!
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95879 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

In Louisville, KY, $250k will get you a 3100 sq. ft. home with a finished walk out basement, wood floors, granite entry ways and counter tops, gas fireplace, 2 tier deck, and many other amenities in a closed beautiful neighborhood surrounded by the same for miles.
ummmm LINK
Posted by lnomm34
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2009
12616 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

I scored a 29


How do you even remember to breathe?? Dumbass.
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23832 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Did this really happen?
More than you know. The MPC is real
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55813 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:45 pm to
Who said they are spoiled?
Posted by volod
Leesville, LA
Member since Jun 2014
5392 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

By the way, there are affordable homes, but they are usually in the suburbs/exurbs (You know, the consistently Republican districts and counties/parishes)


But then begs the question

"Why move all the way out to the suburbs and exurbs if you do not want a lifestyle pertaining to those areas."

Not everyone wants to live out in the middle of (might as well be) nowhere. Some people actually like to go into the city and buy things and participate in activities that are not available in small towns.
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Mingo Was His NameO
quote:

Let's say those other costs are 20 or even 30%, that's still 40-50% higher income compared to rural areas. That's a significant portion. For myself, my starting pay was probably in the 10-15k higher range so that's minimum 5 grand I'd be giving up.



The article quoted earlier does not at any point mention that 40-50% higher income is experienced in urban areas versus rural.

quote:


I'm not saying this is incorrect,


I know its not correct. I've closed a litany of people as an originator and as a closer using this program. In fact I actually closed on my home using USDA's RD Program (I live in a "rural" area on the census map). I'm quite familiar with it.

quote:

hut what is the percentage of people that would realistically choose where to live by the way they can finance their house? It's really just a "bonus." You can't expect people to choose their location based on that.


People do it relentlessly in my area. This isn't anecdotal experience, either. When the crash hit a decade ago, the only 100% money left was bond programs, niche programs and RD. USDA RD Loans were FLOODING the USDA's local offices and the backlog for them to process and sign off is still 21-28 business days in some instances. The program routinely completely runs out of funding each year.

In 2014, there was a $900,000,000 Budget for Section 502 (USADA Rural Development Direct Loans) Mortgages and $24 billion in Section 538 (RD Guaranteed; think Chase Bank originating the paper based on RD guidelines and then submitting to USDA's RD Review department, getting signoff and then servicing it for USDA on their behalf).

I'll throw those numbers out there again...Almost $25 BILLION for these types of mortgages in 2015.

In 2016 and 2017? The same amounts were allotted and/or allocated. $75 billion dollars in loans over 36 months. You telling me this isn't a popular program?

...and this is where things get sticky for me from a context standpoint which is where I initially waded into the discussion. The Baton Rouge "suburbs," of Livingston Parish and Ascension Parish (think Prairieville, Dutchtown, Live Oak, Denham Springs, Walker, Etc) are all considered, "rural," on the census maps while Baton Rouge is considered "urban or suburban".

Current day Denham/Live Oak/Walker aren't exactly rural compared to some place like French Settlement, Frost or Killian. But the census Map gives them this power that allows a litany of homeowners to harness more buying power to afford more home at a lower cost more quickly than folks the same age trying to buy in Melrose, Lake Beau Pre, or Beauregard Town in Baton Rouge proper.

This is far from anecdotal evidence. You can check my numbers as they're pulled from the Summary USDA FY 2017 Budget Summary (page 44 on the page listing, 49 on the PDF itself I believe.

But keep telling me that people aren't utilizing this program and choosing where they live because of it? LP, AP and Tangi have grown like weeds EXACTLY because of this program and programs like it. I disagree whole-heartedly with your assertion otherwise and these stats are what fuels it.
Jump to page
Page First 26 27 28 29
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 28 of 29Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram