- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/23/17 at 12:48 pm to ItNeverRains
Did this really happen?
Posted on 8/23/17 at 1:14 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
For me for example, I didn't necessarily want to move to a metro area, but the salary difference between there and my hometown was just too substantial. I know that's anecdotal (which I've been shitting on) but that reflects the overall shift.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics did a study where they showed that while you earned more than your rural counterparts in income, you spend a third of that on increased housing costs, and also had higher food costs also. You also spend 30%+ more than your rural counterparts and in a sense, the increased costs actually almost totally negate the income increase you experienced.
LINK
When your rural counterpart doesn't have to pony up the 20% down payment thanks to USDA's Rural Development Loan, and gets the exact same interest rate you do, he also has more of his discretionary income free to spend on other things while you're focused on saving a down payment.
In fact, he can finance up to 102% of the appraised price (not the purchase price on a conventional loan that would be one of your only options in an urban area) itself. That caveat of the loan from a programmatic standpoint gives a rural borrower and potential homeowner much more soft, forgivable terms and frees up his income by comparison to someone who has to finance higher amounts and save more in order to have the privilege.
As I said, I think the stats bear out that the difference in income is offset by higher cost of food, living and home ownership by comparison, and the enticements with favorable loan programs like USDA RD Loans eliminate those "hard math," cost differentials altogether IMO.
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 8/23/17 at 1:23 pm to GFunk
I mean your assumptions there are a bit suspect. There are certainly CoL benefits to being in the rural area. On the whole more income, even with a high CoL is better since you can manipulate expenses downward much easier than you can manipulate salary upwards.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 1:58 pm to CorporateTiger
Millennial Americans Are Moving to the 'Burbs, Buying Big SUVs
quote:
Americans aged about 18 to 34 have become the largest group of homebuyers, and almost half live in the suburbs, according to Zillow Group data. As they shop for bigger homes to accommodate growing families, they’re upsizing their vehicles to match. U.S. industry sales of large SUVs have jumped 11 percent in the first half of the year, Ford Motor Co. estimates, compared with increases of 9 percent for midsize and 4 percent for small SUVs.
quote:
The shift to suburbia may surprise those who’ve chided millennials for being more interested in pricey avocado toast than in saving for a home. Much of the generation delayed marriage, childbearing and home ownership after graduating with heaping student-loan debt and entering a weak job market. As more millennials overcome this, many want the life of their baby-boomer parents -- the kids, the house in the ’burbs and the beefy SUV.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:04 pm to GFunk
quote:
The Bureau of Labor Statistics did a study where they showed that while you earned more than your rural counterparts in income, you spend a third of that on increased housing costs, and also had higher food costs also. You also spend 30%+ more than your rural counterparts and in a sense, the increased costs actually almost totally negate the income increase you experienced.
Let's say those other costs are 20 or even 30%, that's still 40-50% higher income compared to rural areas. That's a significant portion. For myself, my starting pay was probably in the 10-15k higher range so that's minimum 5 grand I'd be giving up.
quote:
In fact, he can finance up to 102% of the appraisedprice (not the purchase price on a conventional loan that would be one of your only options in an urban area) itself. That caveat of the loan from a programmatic standpoint gives a rural borrower and potential homeowner much more soft, forgivable terms and frees up his income by comparison to someone who has to finance higher amounts and save more in order to have the privilege.
I'm not saying this is incorrect, hut what is the percentage of people that would realistically choose where to live by the way they can finance their house? It's really just a "bonus." You can't expect people to choose their location based on that.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:09 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Here is your under 120k inventory here in Metarie. It is shite. Not starter home, shite home
120K gets you a house in Kennairie with laminate floors and smelly carpet that hasn't been updated since the first moon landing. It's not even worth renovating.
Plus if you polish a turd and every other house gets torn down and replaced eventually, you'll be stuck with the hood's ugly duckling that no one wants to buy 10 years from now when you're ready to upgrade.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:12 pm to NIH
quote:
Welcome to the OT, home of anecdotal data.
Data: People who score less than a 24 on the ACT tend not to finish college.
There is also the fact that a 30 on the ACT is the 95th percentile and surprisingly anytime a thread about ACT scores rolls around, no one on the OT has scored lower than 30.
For the record, I scored a 30.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:16 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
So a jump in SUV purchases for six months means millennial are spoiled. Solid statistic there.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:22 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
So a jump in SUV purchases for six months means millennial are spoiled. Solid statistic there.
I'm so tired of hearing that millenials are spoiled. Millenials with rich parents are spoiled. Everyone else is screwed. It's a pretty important distinction.
Yes, we all have iPhones. The prior generation had small block v8 mustangs and camaros. Get over it.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:30 pm to Pecker
quote:
This is what happens when you grow up being told that you're a winner (even when you lose) and can do anything you want in life, sky is the limit.
Millenials couldn't even parent themselves correctly!!!!
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:36 pm to TheCaterpillar
It's crazy how different it is from state to state.
In Louisville, KY, $250k will get you a 3100 sq. ft. home with a finished walk out basement, wood floors, granite entry ways and counter tops, gas fireplace, 2 tier deck, and many other amenities in a closed beautiful neighborhood surrounded by the same for miles.
In Louisville, KY, $250k will get you a 3100 sq. ft. home with a finished walk out basement, wood floors, granite entry ways and counter tops, gas fireplace, 2 tier deck, and many other amenities in a closed beautiful neighborhood surrounded by the same for miles.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:37 pm to cahoots
What you expect to live a normal life in addition to owning a home? Let me tell you that no one in my generation had a single minute of fun until they hit 40. Creature comforts? We fricking slept on the floor and stared at rocks for entertainment I tell you!
How dare you expect to be able to eat a meal out and own a house. Restaurants didn't even exist until 1995 you know!!!
How dare you expect to be able to eat a meal out and own a house. Restaurants didn't even exist until 1995 you know!!!
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:39 pm to CoachDon
quote:ummmm LINK
In Louisville, KY, $250k will get you a 3100 sq. ft. home with a finished walk out basement, wood floors, granite entry ways and counter tops, gas fireplace, 2 tier deck, and many other amenities in a closed beautiful neighborhood surrounded by the same for miles.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:43 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
I scored a 29
How do you even remember to breathe?? Dumbass.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:44 pm to TigerCoon
quote:More than you know. The MPC is real
Did this really happen?
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:45 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
Who said they are spoiled?
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:37 pm to tigahbruh
quote:
By the way, there are affordable homes, but they are usually in the suburbs/exurbs (You know, the consistently Republican districts and counties/parishes)
But then begs the question
"Why move all the way out to the suburbs and exurbs if you do not want a lifestyle pertaining to those areas."
Not everyone wants to live out in the middle of (might as well be) nowhere. Some people actually like to go into the city and buy things and participate in activities that are not available in small towns.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:41 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Let's say those other costs are 20 or even 30%, that's still 40-50% higher income compared to rural areas. That's a significant portion. For myself, my starting pay was probably in the 10-15k higher range so that's minimum 5 grand I'd be giving up.
The article quoted earlier does not at any point mention that 40-50% higher income is experienced in urban areas versus rural.
quote:
I'm not saying this is incorrect,
I know its not correct. I've closed a litany of people as an originator and as a closer using this program. In fact I actually closed on my home using USDA's RD Program (I live in a "rural" area on the census map). I'm quite familiar with it.
quote:
hut what is the percentage of people that would realistically choose where to live by the way they can finance their house? It's really just a "bonus." You can't expect people to choose their location based on that.
People do it relentlessly in my area. This isn't anecdotal experience, either. When the crash hit a decade ago, the only 100% money left was bond programs, niche programs and RD. USDA RD Loans were FLOODING the USDA's local offices and the backlog for them to process and sign off is still 21-28 business days in some instances. The program routinely completely runs out of funding each year.
In 2014, there was a $900,000,000 Budget for Section 502 (USADA Rural Development Direct Loans) Mortgages and $24 billion in Section 538 (RD Guaranteed; think Chase Bank originating the paper based on RD guidelines and then submitting to USDA's RD Review department, getting signoff and then servicing it for USDA on their behalf).
I'll throw those numbers out there again...Almost $25 BILLION for these types of mortgages in 2015.
In 2016 and 2017? The same amounts were allotted and/or allocated. $75 billion dollars in loans over 36 months. You telling me this isn't a popular program?
...and this is where things get sticky for me from a context standpoint which is where I initially waded into the discussion. The Baton Rouge "suburbs," of Livingston Parish and Ascension Parish (think Prairieville, Dutchtown, Live Oak, Denham Springs, Walker, Etc) are all considered, "rural," on the census maps while Baton Rouge is considered "urban or suburban".
Current day Denham/Live Oak/Walker aren't exactly rural compared to some place like French Settlement, Frost or Killian. But the census Map gives them this power that allows a litany of homeowners to harness more buying power to afford more home at a lower cost more quickly than folks the same age trying to buy in Melrose, Lake Beau Pre, or Beauregard Town in Baton Rouge proper.
This is far from anecdotal evidence. You can check my numbers as they're pulled from the Summary USDA FY 2017 Budget Summary (page 44 on the page listing, 49 on the PDF itself I believe.
But keep telling me that people aren't utilizing this program and choosing where they live because of it? LP, AP and Tangi have grown like weeds EXACTLY because of this program and programs like it. I disagree whole-heartedly with your assertion otherwise and these stats are what fuels it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News