Started By
Message

re: The FBI Can Hack Your Computer With No Warrant

Posted on 6/26/16 at 7:56 am to
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 7:56 am to
Antonin Scalia's death will be looked back on as the death of our freedom from a tyrannical federal government. A liberal court is the most scary and dangerous aspects of our government system.
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20862 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Judge Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.


The man is about 85 years old and still on the bench.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 8:00 am to
quote:

Allegably


Supposably?
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 8:05 am to
Possibru?
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71013 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Not that it will matter to the OT but there is a bit more to this when you read the article. They seized, with a warrant, a server running a child porn site. They then continued running the server and captured all the IP addresses coming in. Then went after the owners of the IP addresses. It's on the edge of not being acceptable but not as if they are sitting around Quantico just made hacking everyone's laptops.


Except that wasn't his reasoning. What you're saying is more like an authorized wiretap. You pick up dirt on anyone calling that number.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76270 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Antonin Scalia's death will be looked back on as the death of our freedom from a tyrannical federal government. A liberal court is the most scary and dangerous aspects of our government system.

Well this judge was appointed by HW Bush so maybe it's time you grow out of the lazy liberal/conservative mindset. Besides, it's "conservatives" who traditionally favor more intrusive law enforcement at the expense of personal freedoms.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18667 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Generally, one has no reasonable expectation of privacy in an IP address when using the internet


This is the most intellectually dishonest thing I have read in a while. Just because using the internet requires an understanding of risks and vulnerabilities does not mean that you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy. That's why people use firewalls, secure server verifications, and authenticity screenings.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Most judges are pretty technically illiterate.


Am I the only one that gets super nervous that these dinosaurs are the ones making landmark decisions on technical cases when most of them don't have the slightest fricking clue the ramifications? Wasn't there a Super Court judge who admitted they don't have email. How in the frick is that person qualified to make a decision about a computer/internet ruling.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 10:23 am to
quote:

This is the most intellectually dishonest thing I have read in a while.



The logical expansion:

If you have a window in your house people can just look in so you have no expectation of privacy no need for a warrant to tear your house apart.
Posted by vjp819
South Sec. 414 / Alex Box Sec. 210
Member since Nov 2003
10882 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 10:27 am to
if they hack into my computer, they would only do it once since the first time would bore them to tears.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51900 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Basically, Morgan Jr. argued, cars are stolen every day and no one should expect privacy within them while operating out of their homes.
This post was edited on 6/26/16 at 10:41 am
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
10377 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 12:07 pm to
Basically, the issue here is this:

"Because we all know that child porn is so reprehensible, is it OK to violate the constitution in order to efficiently sweep up and incarcerate consumers and producers of child pornography?"

And the answer, of course, is: No.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76472 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 12:09 pm to
Well. . .Acreboy is fricked
Posted by stlslick
St.Louis,Mo
Member since Nov 2012
14054 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 12:17 pm to
patriot act

and yes, thanx Obama for keeping it going, when it could of expired.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram