- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The FBI Can Hack Your Computer With No Warrant
Posted on 6/26/16 at 7:56 am to SG_Geaux
Posted on 6/26/16 at 7:56 am to SG_Geaux
Antonin Scalia's death will be looked back on as the death of our freedom from a tyrannical federal government. A liberal court is the most scary and dangerous aspects of our government system.
Posted on 6/26/16 at 7:58 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
Judge Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.
The man is about 85 years old and still on the bench.
Posted on 6/26/16 at 8:00 am to CrimsonTideMD
quote:
Allegably
Supposably?
Posted on 6/26/16 at 8:09 am to jbgleason
quote:
Not that it will matter to the OT but there is a bit more to this when you read the article. They seized, with a warrant, a server running a child porn site. They then continued running the server and captured all the IP addresses coming in. Then went after the owners of the IP addresses. It's on the edge of not being acceptable but not as if they are sitting around Quantico just made hacking everyone's laptops.
Except that wasn't his reasoning. What you're saying is more like an authorized wiretap. You pick up dirt on anyone calling that number.
Posted on 6/26/16 at 8:12 am to Breesus
quote:
Antonin Scalia's death will be looked back on as the death of our freedom from a tyrannical federal government. A liberal court is the most scary and dangerous aspects of our government system.
Well this judge was appointed by HW Bush so maybe it's time you grow out of the lazy liberal/conservative mindset. Besides, it's "conservatives" who traditionally favor more intrusive law enforcement at the expense of personal freedoms.
Posted on 6/26/16 at 8:43 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
Generally, one has no reasonable expectation of privacy in an IP address when using the internet
This is the most intellectually dishonest thing I have read in a while. Just because using the internet requires an understanding of risks and vulnerabilities does not mean that you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy. That's why people use firewalls, secure server verifications, and authenticity screenings.
Posted on 6/26/16 at 9:04 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Most judges are pretty technically illiterate.
Am I the only one that gets super nervous that these dinosaurs are the ones making landmark decisions on technical cases when most of them don't have the slightest fricking clue the ramifications? Wasn't there a Super Court judge who admitted they don't have email. How in the frick is that person qualified to make a decision about a computer/internet ruling.
Posted on 6/26/16 at 10:23 am to Bmath
quote:
This is the most intellectually dishonest thing I have read in a while.
The logical expansion:
If you have a window in your house people can just look in so you have no expectation of privacy no need for a warrant to tear your house apart.
Posted on 6/26/16 at 10:27 am to SG_Geaux
if they hack into my computer, they would only do it once since the first time would bore them to tears.
Posted on 6/26/16 at 10:33 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
Basically, Morgan Jr. argued, cars are stolen every day and no one should expect privacy within them while operating out of their homes.
This post was edited on 6/26/16 at 10:41 am
Posted on 6/26/16 at 12:07 pm to SG_Geaux
Basically, the issue here is this:
"Because we all know that child porn is so reprehensible, is it OK to violate the constitution in order to efficiently sweep up and incarcerate consumers and producers of child pornography?"
And the answer, of course, is: No.
"Because we all know that child porn is so reprehensible, is it OK to violate the constitution in order to efficiently sweep up and incarcerate consumers and producers of child pornography?"
And the answer, of course, is: No.
Posted on 6/26/16 at 12:09 pm to SG_Geaux
Well. . .Acreboy is fricked
Posted on 6/26/16 at 12:17 pm to SG_Geaux
patriot act
and yes, thanx Obama for keeping it going, when it could of expired.
and yes, thanx Obama for keeping it going, when it could of expired.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News