- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:26 pm to AlxTgr
OK, so you mean your client had a lawyer (you), but the gal had no lawyer?
So a lawyer was involved, right?
So a lawyer was involved, right?
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:28 pm to VetteGuy
quote:Oh, yeah. They don't like that. Pretty tough to establish.
To clarify, I am referring to things like diminished value.
quote:This is total bullshite.
Insurance companies are like crime, they don't pay.
quote:I have seen some pretty big payments arising out of impacts that basically removed dust from a bumper. That stipulation to 50K or less is a bitch.
a fender bender or minor accident would probably not require the services of lawyer
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:29 pm to VetteGuy
quote:The plaintiff had no lawyer. She convinced the two companies to pay those amounts. One of the two companies had a lawyer.
OK, so you mean your client had a lawyer (you), but the gal had no lawyer?
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:40 pm to AlxTgr
quote:And she got $70k? Probably had a fusion which cost her 50k and your client convinced her 20k was adequate compensation for her pain and suffering, right?
The plaintiff had no lawyer. She convinced the two companies to pay those amounts. One of the two companies had a lawyer.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:42 pm to Neauxla
quote:
And she got $70k? Probably had a fusion which cost her 50k and your client convinced her 20k was adequate compensation for her pain and suffering, right?
This was my thinking. $70,000 for a $20,000 loss is great. $70,000 for a $60,000 loss is terrible.
Also, if the party paying $20,000 is represented by a lawyer, it's safe to assume that the lawyer was more than happy to cut that check because the claim was worth a lot more
ETA: and if USAA paid the 50k and was represented, then that was probably the policy limit and the loss was either close to or beyond the policy limits.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:48 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
The plaintiff had no lawyer. She convinced the two companies to pay those amounts. One of the two companies had a lawyer.
I've sat and watched this thread for a bit. I'm gonna need some more information before I bestow a crown on USAA here.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:50 pm to Neauxla
quote:
Probably had a fusion which cost her 50k and your client convinced her 20k was adequate compensation for her pain and suffering, right?
She is now a quad who can no longer work as a riverboat pilot.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:50 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
We don't escalate our % if suit is filed
OK, but the injured individual has to pay out of their own portion for the filing fees (and all other fees associated with the case). While a suit is necessary in many cases to get a fair offer, most cases don't actually make it to court. Generally speaking these cases settle out of court. Not saying the attorney deserves nothing, but many of these cases only take a few hours of legitimate work for attorneys and they are getting tens of thousands of dollars. It's bullshite.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:59 pm to DaTroof
quote:
Not saying the attorney deserves nothing, but many of these cases only take a few hours of legitimate work for attorneys and they are getting tens of thousands of dollars. It's bullshite.
This can be true, but there are also times when I spend many hours on a small case and make $20/hour. In the cases where I spend a small amount of time and the fees are large or I feel the fee is excessive, I will often reduce my fees. The attorney also takes considerable risk in expenditures that the client often cannot pay.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 4:01 pm to Neauxla
quote:I totally misremembered. USAA paid $100K. Meds were under $50K. She negotiated that down with blue cross after the USAA payment. No fusion. right hip arthroscopy w/ labral repair.
The plaintiff had no lawyer. She convinced the two companies to pay those amounts. One of the two companies had a lawyer.
And she got $70k? Probably had a fusion which cost her 50k and your client convinced her 20k was adequate compensation for her pain and suffering, right?
Posted on 4/6/16 at 4:02 pm to MoonrakerElite
quote:You do this poorly.
it's safe to assume
Posted on 4/6/16 at 4:03 pm to Motorboat
quote:
I will often reduce my fees
Look, I don't know you and I'm sure you're telling the truth, but surely you don't expect anyone to believe that the majority of attorneys do this. Ever
quote:
The attorney also takes considerable risk in expenditures that the client often cannot pay
Nah, in fact personal injury attorneys take very little risk. Your previous statement just got less believable.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 4:05 pm to DaTroof
quote:
The amount that goes to pay your doctor bills shouldn't be part of what the attorney gets. The attorney should get 30% of what he/she can negotiate AFTER medical bills. Would be tough to find an attorney to do this, but trust me, it's possible and only fair in my opinion.
Good luck with that one! Most attorneys don't work that way!
Posted on 4/6/16 at 4:05 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
You do this poorly
quote:
I misremembered
As do you.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 4:06 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:I know a guy that not only raises from 33 and 1/3 to 40, but has filed suit for people that have fired him, AFTER he was fired.
We don't escalate our % if suit is filed,
Posted on 4/6/16 at 4:08 pm to DaTroof
quote:
Nah, in fact personal injury attorneys take very little risk. Your previous statement just got less believable.
A lot of stuff in this thread is debatable. This isn't.
If an injured client is uninsured, the PI attorneys have no clue what the policy limits are 99% of the time. They have to balance paying their clients medicals against what the policy might be.
Now, if a client comes in with $10,000 in injuries and $100,000 in UM coverage, your statement is completely true. But that isn't the case most of the time.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 4:09 pm to kellyval99
quote:
Most attorneys don't work that way
There are some that will. Attorneys know a good case when they see one. If they know you're about to get paid and you're going somewhere else if they aren't a little more reasonable with their fees, they will negotiate. They know there is another attorney out there that will negotiate fees with you and they just lost out on easy money.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 4:09 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Insurance companies are like crime, they don't pay. This is total bullshite.
Fair enough. I should've said they don't like to pay. The problem is they don't like to pay what they legitimately should pay. Clearly, it is best to have a lawyer representing you. Much like your client did when "a lawyer wasn't involved".
Diminished value is very easy to ascribe, at least on cars.
Look, I've tried being a nice guy in these deals. It almost never works, much like your client, I believe in representation.
Maybe the woman got a fair deal, maybe she didn't. I think she took a foolish risk.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News