Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Started By
Message

Pregnant Woman Slammed to Ground and Arrested for Refusing to Give Her Name

Posted on 5/28/15 at 1:54 pm
Posted by Cumulonimbus
Alabama
Member since Jun 2014
623 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 1:54 pm
Article, Video, and Pictures
quote:

Shocking body camera video shows two Southern California cops slam an eight-months pregnant woman to the ground after a parking lot dispute started as the woman dropped her child off at school.

The city of Barstow, an Inland Empire city in San Bernardino County, defended the officers' actions, writing in a statement that Charlena Michelle Cooks was actively resisting arrest during the January incident.

"The Barstow Police Department continues to be proactive in training its officers to assess and handle interactions with emotionally charged individuals while conducting an investigation, for the protection of everyone involved," the statement, obtained by the Desert Dispatch, reads.

The bizarre confrontation began when Cooks and another woman, a school employee, got into a “road rage” confrontation in the parking lot at Crestline Elementary School, where Cooks was dropping off her second-grade daughter.

The officer, speaking to the other woman, says no crime has been committed and he’ll go speak to Cooks about what happened and “document her name.”

As Cooks explains her side, the officer suddenly cuts her off and asks for identification, something he hadn’t done with the other woman.

"I don't even think that that disagreement in the parking lot was enough to warrant a call to the police," Cooks told the Dispatch.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, which took up Cooks’ case and released the video, says California law does not require someone to identify themselves “for no reason.”

Cooks, in the video, tells the officer that she’d like to call her boyfriend and verify the law about identification. But the officer, after first promising to give her “two minutes” to find out whether she must give up her name, walks up to Cooks after 20 seconds and grabs her arm as she wriggles and starts to yell.

“Do not touch me, do not touch me, I’m pregnant!” Cooks begs as she’s pushed against a chain link fence. “What the f--k is going on!”

A second officer comes over and the officer with the camera on asks, “Why are you resisting, ma’am?”

The two Barstow police officers shoved Charlena Cooks, who was eight months pregnant at the time, onto the ground on her stomach as they arrested her for resisting arrest.
PreviousNextCharlena Cooks of Barstow, California was eight months pregnant when she and an employee at her daughter's school got in a 'petty' argument Charlena Cooks of Barstow, California was eight months pregnant when she and an employee at her daughter's school got in a 'petty' argument Charlena Cooks of Barstow, California was eight months pregnant when she and an employee at her daughter's school got in a 'petty' argument Charlena Cooks of Barstow, California was eight months pregnant when she and an employee at her daughter's school got in a 'petty' argument Enlarge
ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
The two Barstow police officers shoved Charlena Cooks, who was eight months pregnant at the time, onto the ground on her stomach as they arrested her for resisting arrest.

He and the other officer then took her to the ground, stomach down, and handcuffed her behind her back.

“This is ridiculous, what are you doing?” the incredulous Cooks asks. “I didn’t even do anything wrong.”

"I don't think I've ever been that terrified in my life," Cooks recently told the Dispatch. "I never saw that coming. I told him I was pregnant so he could proceed with caution. That didn't happen and the first thing I thought was I didn't want to fall to the ground. I felt the pressure on my stomach from falling and I was calling for help. But those guys are supposed to help me. But who is supposed to help me when they are attacking me?"

Cooks was put in the back of a police cruiser and later booked on a charge of resisting or obstructing a police officer, a charge later tossed by a judge.

The officer involved in the incident is shown on video recounting for another officer what happened.

“I gave her a minute to give up her name and I went to put her under arrest and she resisted arrest,” he said. “That’s all there is to it.”

Cooks later gave birth to a heatlhy baby girl, but she’s been banned from the school property and is considering leaving Barstow after the incident.

"I'm still trying to process everything and get in a good state of mind," she told the Dispatch. "I'm in a very fearful state of mind. Barstow is so small and I used to be comfortable living here. Not anymore. I really felt like after all that happened I had some of my everyday freedoms taken from me."

A judge dropped the charges, the officers were not disciplined, and she was banned from the school, so I ask who (if anyone) was in the wrong here because the consequences don't make sense? I don't get sensationalized and don't believe that law enforcement pose a threat to me just because I'm a minority. I've noticed that there's plenty of animosity towards cops here, so what's the OT's take on this story? I don't mean for this to be a political topic, but rather an open discussion on what the OT thinks should have happened.
Posted by JETigER
LSU 2011 National Champions
Member since Dec 2003
7081 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

pregnant
quote:

boyfriend


Why are they not married.

Are they trying to milk the system by her staying single so she gets more benefits where the boyfriends income is not in the equation.

She is morally in the wrong 100%. She has broken God's law.
Posted by Phil0ndeeez
Houston
Member since Apr 2013
1387 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

She is morally in the wrong 100%. She has broken God's law.


Agreed, wait till the devil slams that arse.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30559 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:01 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/28/15 at 2:02 pm
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30559 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:02 pm to
tl;dr??
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120257 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:05 pm to
I didnt read the article and im not gonna defend cops.

But im guessing it was another instance where if she was just polite to the officers she could have been on her way in a few seconds.

As jerseytiger always said "I am 100% sure this will never happen to me."
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:05 pm to
cops sure like giving public money away to people in lawsuits
Posted by Hermit Crab
Under the Sea
Member since Nov 2008
7166 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

But im guessing it was another instance where if she was just polite to the officers she could have been on her way in a few seconds.


I usually agree with this, but in this instance I don't think they needed to arrest anyone. not even sure why the cops were called in the first place.

and it seems like they only arrested her for "resisting arrest", I would think there needs to be a reason to be under arrest before you can resist it.
This post was edited on 5/28/15 at 2:13 pm
Posted by DonChowder
Sonoma County
Member since Dec 2012
9249 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

The city of Barstow
is a fricking shithole.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:10 pm to
Police training on the law in these situations is mostly a joke. They aren't trained on the law, but on what terms to use in their reports to skirt the law. Glad there was a body cam.
Posted by sjmabry
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
18498 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Why are they not married. Are they trying to milk the system by her staying single so she gets more benefits where the boyfriends income is not in the equation. She is morally in the wrong 100%. She has broken God's law.
You sound like a typical OT jerk...
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83929 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

But im guessing it was another instance where if she was just polite to the officers she could have been on her way in a few seconds


Have you ever tried to reason with an 8 month pregnant woman? The cops are 100% in the wrong.
Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
20114 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:15 pm to
Looked to me like the officers acted appropriately.

If we want our cops to be street level arbiters of angry confrontations between people, then we should expect a level of cooperation. If people are uncooperative, I have no problem with cops making arrests for minor misdemeanor resisting an officer type charges.

If we don't want officers to get involved in those incidents, then we can expect more people to escalate those interactions with violence. It's all a part of being a member of a civil society. Cooperate with the cops, especially when they are being reasonable, or else expect to get arrested.

Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86467 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:15 pm to
White lady answers all questions asked, goes on about her day.

Black lady throws down the race card, refuses to answer basic questions like her name, gets dealt with.


Seems pretty cut and dry what happened here.
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:16 pm to
I literally hate cops. I don't use them and have never had a "need" for one.

If I ever need one, great! But I won't "owe" them gratitude. I've been paying taxes out of my arse for 30+ years to pay them to be there when needed.

There was NO "need" in this case.

I don't care what happens, a pregnant woman should never be handled and the on to the ground for resisting arrest. Shocker, people with medical conditions resist being handled!
Posted by Happygilmore
Happy Place
Member since Mar 2009
1810 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:16 pm to
has the teacher in the video been caught with a student yet in the sac. that would be a way better story, she fine!
This post was edited on 5/28/15 at 2:19 pm
Posted by Cumulonimbus
Alabama
Member since Jun 2014
623 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

You sound like a typical OT jerk...

I thank you and the last few posters for actually addressing the relevant problems. Extramarital sex is not the issue in this article.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86467 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

But im guessing it was another instance where if she was just polite to the officers she could have been on her way in a few seconds.

As jerseytiger always said "I am 100% sure this will never happen to me."


Correct. I'll sum up using C for cop, WL for white lady, BL for black lady.


C- what happened
WL- tells story, woman was driving crazy, etc
C- well, I don't see any evidence of an actual crime, so all I can do is document what you're saying
WL- ok
C- what happened
BL- tells her side. Says something to the affect of "is it because she's white, she's trying to make friends" or some gibberish
C- I don't know. Let me get your name
BL- hold on, let me call someone and see if I can give you my name


Goes on for another minute, refuses to cooperate, gets tossed.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166246 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:18 pm to
no pics no care
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

Seems pretty cut and dry what happened here.
Yep. Once again a cop ignored the law and assaulted a citizen. He should be prosecuted just like any other a-hole that assaults a pregnant citizen.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram