Started By
Message

re: OT History "What If" Discussion: Germany Wins WWI in 1914

Posted on 4/17/14 at 4:18 pm to
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16927 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

What would our world look like today?


The question largely hinges on what terms the war was ended and how the peace was orchestrated. Clearly the conditions for the rise of National Socialism in Germany will not exist as Marxism and leftism will be of no threat to power in Germany. Likewise, it's hard to imagine that either Germany or Britain would not work with extreme determination to establish a stable French government opposed to Marxist forces that might seek a power grab in France's destitution. I can see France, Britain, and Germany remaining traditional powers rivaling each other for influence as was the case in prior European periods. I think relative stability would ensue as the horrific nature of the war generally changed minds about the feasibility of war to achieve minor gains without balooning into catastrophe due to industrialization and the advent of more destructive armaments.

That being said, I think the really interesting areas to watch would be the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Balkans region. Hitler himself railed against Austro-Hungarian Empire and it's untenable political situation given the tremendous variety of ethnic nationalities subjugated under the Hapsburgs. This was an observation he had prior to the outbreak of the war, leading him to make an appeal to serve with a Bavarian outfit instead of his much loathed homeland. And this area having been the powderkeg that set off WWI to begin with.

Obviously the age of empire would have continued on, perhaps much longer than it did in the real life course of history, but that period was destined to come to a head at some point. If it was had to do over again, I think essentially every major belligerent nation's leadership would say the war was a mistake (with the possible exception of Churchill) and should have been averted. There was no great moral crusade to be had nor imminent ideological threat posed by one of those nations against the other.

Obviously there are infintie variables but I certainly don't think the world would be thrown into some terrible course had Germany won WWI. Though the victors do love to fear monger and exaggerrate the importance of their cause to history.
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 4:21 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64768 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

The question largely hinges on what terms the war was ended and how the peace was orchestrated. Clearly the conditions for the rise of National Socialism in Germany will not exist as Marxism and leftism will be of no threat to power in Germany. Likewise, it's hard to imagine that either Germany or Britain would not work with extreme determination to establish a stable French government opposed to Marxist forces that might seek a power grab in France's destitution. I can see France, Britain, and Germany remaining traditional powers rivaling each other for influence as was the case in prior European periods. I think relative stability would ensue as the horrific nature of the war generally changed minds about the feasibility of war to achieve minor gains without balooning into catastrophe due to industrialization and the advent of more destructive armaments.



I agree. I think the fact that had the war ended in late summer 1914 this would have meant the bitterness that we know of WWI would have never materialized. There would have been no trenches, No Somme, No Verdun. Britain & Germany especially would have wanted to get back to "business as usual" as quickly as possible. I do think they'd make stride to stabilize France, with Germany perhaps treating France in 1914 much in the same manner they did in 1940. On thing I do think that would emerge once the situation in Europe stabilized, is a sort of cold war between GB & Germany while they vied for the position of premier world power. How the alliances and politics of this cold war played out is anyone's guess. Who would the US side with? What about an emerging Japan? And what of the "sick old man of Europe", the Ottoman Empire? Would GB or Germany set their sights on them?

Russia on the other hand is a bit of an interesting story. In my version of history they would have sued for peace basically before they really got the war going good in the East. And unlike in GB, there already was winds of revolution brewing in Russia. Would have the humiliation of allowing Germany to win a war basally before Russia even mobilized fully have lead to more unrest? Would that have been enough to topple the Romanov Dynasty?

quote:

That being said, I think the really interesting areas to watch would be the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Balkans region. Hitler himself railed against Austro-Hungarian Empire and it's untenable political situation given the tremendous variety of ethnic nationalities subjugated under the Hapsburgs. This was an observation he had prior to the outbreak of the war, leading him to make an appeal to serve with a Bavarian outfit instead of his much loathed homeland.



I think it's anyone's guess how things would have played out in the Balkans. It's such a muddled region that literally anything could have happened. In fact, it's entire possible that in an effort to maintain it's grasp on power, the Hapsburg dynasty could have launched it's own "holocaust" against the Slavic peoples in it's dominion. Now how this would have rippled through history is a good question. Would Russia, the longtime "champion" of all the Slavs, have stood by and done nothing? What about Germany?

quote:

Obviously the age of empire would have continued on, perhaps much longer than it did in the real life course of history, but that period was destined to come to a head at some point. If it was had to do over again, I think essentially every major belligerent nation's leadership would say the war was a mistake (with the possible exception of Churchill) and should have been averted. There was no great moral crusade to be had nor imminent ideological threat posed by one of those nations against the other.


I think the age of empire could actually have seen a resurgence in that a victorious Germany would see their win over Britain as further proof they truly did deserve their "Day In The Sun". I think there could be seen conflicts in the Pacific, Africa, the Middle East, and even perhaps Central & South America over control of key colonies. These conflicts could play a key role in the cold war I mentioned above.

quote:

Obviously there are infintie variables but I certainly don't think the world would be thrown into some terrible course had Germany won WWI. Though the victors do love to fear monger and exaggerrate the importance of their cause to history.



Good point. And the more I think of it, the more I believe it's highly possible ours would be a more stable and safe world had Germany won in the summer of 1914.
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 4:39 pm
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16927 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 4:39 pm to
I think we've been anchored.


ETA: Nope!
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 4:40 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64768 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 4:40 pm to
No, we're back on top.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 6:03 pm to
There's no question that the world would be a better place without all the lives lost, the art treasures destroyed, and the ethnic hatreds not engendered.

You can only argue how much better the world would have been off with a German victory. You can't argue 'if".
Posted by Tigris
Mexican Home
Member since Jul 2005
12366 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

And the more I think of it, the more I believe it's highly possible ours would be a more stable and safe world had Germany won in the summer of 1914.


Possible and maybe even probable. But the huge question that is unanswered is who develops the atomic bomb and what do they do with it? Germany would likely be first, as a guess. Russia might be toast in the 50's.
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 7:16 pm to
This hypothetical postulates a win similar to what the Germans would achieve in 1940. But just as in 1940, the UK would still have a lot of fight left in them, arguably more. And would a win on the Marne completely knock out France. I don't think France had the bitter political divisions that created Vichy. Could the French Army with its still strong nationalism pulled back to continue fighting?

While you answer that, I'm going to put some thought into what Italy would have done based on your what if.

ETA: I think Italy jumps France and is able to take French North Africa
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 7:25 pm
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22504 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

What would our world look like today?
IDK if Germany was fighting for conquest or for economic dominance. If Germany had won, the dying monarchies of Europe would have had a breath of new life. The end of colonialism may have been delayed or prevented. There would have been no humiliating Treaty of Versailles. The economic discontent of the pre-Hitler era might not have happened, and Hitler may have died an obscure paperhanger. No SS. No Gestapo. No Holocaust. But Communism might have had more room to operate. Brutal Stalin may have become expansionist anyway.
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 7:40 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51473 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 7:41 pm to
Japan was expanding. The Russo Jappo war was the catalyst. They would have invaded China regardless.

Russia was coming apart. Every time the Tsar appointed someone decent, his wife would sabotage the person. They were out of touch, didn't get it, and were losing control of the country. A revolution would have happened at some point in that country.
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 7:52 pm
Posted by BlackenedOut
The Big Sleazy
Member since Feb 2011
5811 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 7:49 pm to
There was a discussion the other week about a book written that talks about how the British basically caused world war I because they failed to understand the issues. Or at least I seem to recall that.

I thought I ordered the book, but I did not and know I cant find any reference to it. Any help is appreciated.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64768 posts
Posted on 4/18/14 at 9:39 am to
Bump

quote:

Possible and maybe even probable. But the huge question that is unanswered is who develops the atomic bomb and what do they do with it? Germany would likely be first, as a guess. Russia might be toast in the 50's.



I'd imagine that Germany would be the first to develop it being that they had the best scientific minds at that time. Remember that Einstein only left Germany due to the Nazis. Had Germany won WWI in the summer of 1914, the Nazis would have never existed.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64768 posts
Posted on 4/18/14 at 9:48 am to
quote:

This hypothetical postulates a win similar to what the Germans would achieve in 1940. But just as in 1940, the UK would still have a lot of fight left in them, arguably more. And would a win on the Marne completely knock out France. I don't think France had the bitter political divisions that created Vichy. Could the French Army with its still strong nationalism pulled back to continue fighting?



WEll had the German's stuck to the Schieffen Plan, it along iwth the French Plan XVII would have created a situation where the German's controlled Paris and French Armies would have found themselves basically surrounded and cut off from their supply lines in France. Here is a good map to show what could have happened...



Had these events transpired then WWI would have looked a lot like a cut-down version of the Franco-Prussian War that had been fought a little over 40 years before.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42574 posts
Posted on 4/18/14 at 10:00 am to
Keep in mind, WW1 thrusted us to tWorld power. If the Germans would have one, who knows how we would've ended up.

ETA:

And because we keep them in check, Europe has been at peace for a long time. 'Merica.
This post was edited on 4/18/14 at 10:02 am
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64768 posts
Posted on 4/18/14 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Keep in mind, WW1 thrusted us to tWorld power. If the Germans would have one, who knows how we would've ended up.


It's true that WWI completed the process of making the US a world power (a process that had been going on since the middle of the 19th century BTW). But if WWI had ended in the summer of 1914 the role of the US in world affairs would have been completely altered. For starters, a quick war would have not forced the belligerents to spend years hemorrhaging funds in their war efforts and going deep into debt to the US. It was the fact that the US came out of WWI as the richest country on the globe, thanks to huge debts owed to it by countries like GB & France, that was the main factor in allowing the US to supplant GB as the premier world power.

Now this, like everything else in this thread is pure supposition, but I'd imagine that had WWI ended in the summer of 1914 the US would continue to be a growing economic & naval power that by the 1920's or perhaps 1930's would become big enough to be seen as a potential threat by either Germany or GB, or perhaps even both. How would that triangle of power work out? Would Germany seek an alliance with the US against a still potent GB? Or would it be the other way around? And then there are other peripheral powers like Russia, Austria, the Ottomans, & Japan to consider. All these powers would have their roles to play on the world stage as well. Perhaps the alliance system seen prior to WWI would still be around with some of the players shuffled due to the quick German victory in WWI. If this were the case, I'd imagine that war between the two rival alliances would eventually become unavoidable. Imagine WWII breaking out in about 1950 with Germany, Austria, Italy, the Ottomans, and the US on one side with GB, Russia, Japan, and whatever form unoccupied France was at the time on the other. Wounder how that war would play out?
This post was edited on 4/18/14 at 10:22 am
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42574 posts
Posted on 4/18/14 at 10:39 am to
The problem, any time the Germans are organized, it's a large issue for the world. They're the smartest humans on the planet, and create dangerous toys.
Posted by Diddles
LA
Member since Apr 2013
6981 posts
Posted on 4/18/14 at 10:54 am to
They wouldn't have bombed Pearl Harbor ... that's for sure
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64768 posts
Posted on 4/18/14 at 10:59 am to
quote:

They wouldn't have bombed Pearl Harbor ... that's for sure


Well, perhaps they may have. Remember that the German's held a number of Pacific Islands before losing them in WWI. There is a chance that a victorious Germany would eventually clash with the US, an emerging world power and potential rival to continued German expansion in the Pacific. Then again, it could be the British who would eventually bomb Pearl Harbor. For that matter you could see something like a joint American/German fleet attacking Hong Kong or Singapore. The possibilities are mind boggling.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48467 posts
Posted on 4/18/14 at 11:52 am to
quote:

But what if Von Kluck had not made this mistake? Which this mistake was not entirely on him to be fair. What if the "Miracle on the Marne had never happened? What if the Germans had followed Count Alfred von Schlieffen's dying words of "remember to keep the right flank strong" and thus defeated the French & Brits in the summer of 1914? What would our world look like today?





This or a negotiated peace settlement of the Great War sometime in 1915 or 1916 could very well have brought very positive results for Europe and the world. The hypothetical doesn't really require a German victory -- some kind of negotiated peace agreement would have brought something better than what actually happened.

Minor point of military history. Just before the Battle of the Marne, Kluck's 1st Army was probably too weak to make any correct decision with regard to placement of his forces. The German Right Wing had already been weakened by more than two infantry corps worth of strength.

It would have been possible for Germany to win in the West in 1914, but, IMHO, it would have taken another five fresh German infantry corps deployed on von Kluck's right to accomplish that. Five corps was an Army-level unit.

Some historians argue that even that would not have worked, because there was no way to keep such a large right wing logistically supported. The supply railheads were not close enough to Kluck's front line to provide good supply and replacements flow.

Great question to ponder. Saving Europe from the destruction of WW2 is something to dream about.
This post was edited on 4/18/14 at 11:54 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram