- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:31 pm to LSUROXS
quote:
You're an idiot for even typing the statement above. I bet if it were a family member you'd be beating the vengeance drum! How about the "good POS" stopping the leader? IDK but just being part of the act is enough to warrant the punishment.
So being part of a car theft as a 17-18 year old is something we should kill someone over? For all we know, one kid had a gun and as soon as they pulled over shot the kid without the others even knowing he had a gun. That's just as likely as any other situation, and more likely than all 3 idiots getting out and making a democratic decision.
I hate this happened as much as anyone, but the last thing I want is to spend tax payer money on 3 hots and cot for life for 2 idiots because they stole a car and one of their buddies pulled a gun out and shot the kid in the back seat for no reason.
This post was edited on 5/22/17 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:31 pm to LSU Tiger Bob
quote:
Not that it matters but I'm just curious, was the kid white, black, or what?
It matters not!!
It matters in jail.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:37 pm to TheCaterpillar
Not to mention that the child was the grandson of one of the higher-ups of the Vice Lords.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:38 pm to baldona
quote:
So being part of a car theft as a 17-18 year old is something we should kill someone over
Just car theft? No. However, the kid/adult (17/18) is already making decisions that would lead one to believe he will not be a productive member of society. Stealing a car is just property.
Kidnap ramps that up a bit, especially kidnapping a child.
When that kidnap leads to murder then it should be immediate death for the murderer, and the same for the accomplices as they did nothing to stop these actions. If they immediately turned themselves in after the crime then maybe life in prison or very lengthy sentence
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:45 pm to Saskwatch
quote:
Just car theft? No. However, the kid/adult (17/18) is already making decisions that would lead one to believe he will not be a productive member of society. Stealing a car is just property.
Kidnap ramps that up a bit, especially kidnapping a child.
When that kidnap leads to murder then it should be immediate death for the murderer, and the same for the accomplices as they did nothing to stop these actions. If they immediately turned themselves in after the crime then maybe life in prison or very lengthy sentence
I could be wrong, but I doubt they knew there was a kid in there until they were already driving away. At which point, if there was a cop in the parkign lot they freaked out and decided to drive further away.
All I'm saying, is its doubtful all 3 intended on it being a kidnapping and murder. These are all 3 probably borderline mentally retarded kids with bad upbringings. There's nothing good to come of this, I just don't think they should all rot if they weren't all 3 involved in the shooting.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:48 pm to lsucoonass
quote:
That's where I disagree I don't think they feel any remorse and won't care
I agree that the three killers probably don't feel remorse. I'm talking about the other inmates at the prison where they'll be. Criminals who harm children don't fare very well in prison.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:49 pm to peaster68
quote:
Not to mention that the child was the grandson of one of the higher-ups of the Vice Lords.
No way.
If that's true, these guys are dead.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:53 pm to baldona
quote:
So being part of a car theft as a 17-18 year old is something we should kill someone over? For all we know, one kid had a gun and as soon as they pulled over shot the kid without the others even knowing he had a gun. That's just as likely as any other situation, and more likely than all 3 idiots getting out and making a democratic decision.
I guess they shouldn't have been stealing a car then. Or, I bet you have an excuse for them for that one too.
None of these assholes deserve to be given the benefit of the doubt in this situation.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:54 pm to baldona
quote:
All I'm saying, is its doubtful all 3 intended on it being a kidnapping and murder
Then why are they armed? Why have a gun when committing a criminal act unless you have the intention of killing whomever might present a problem (identifying perpetrator).
I don't see how your post is any justification for leniency
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:54 pm to baldona
quote:
These are all 3 probably borderline mentally retarded kids
You have absolutely no basis for saying this.
Absolutely none.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:55 pm to baldona
quote:
All I'm saying, is its doubtful all 3 intended on it being a kidnapping and murder.
Well, that's what it turned into. The 2 who didn't pull the trigger had time to prevent this car theft from turning into a kidnapping and murder. They didn't, so now they get to pay the price for their action/inaction
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:57 pm to jchamil
Another thing, all 3 saw the murder of a 6 year old happen.
Not 1 of them turned himself or his friends in. They were trying to get away with it.
If one of them went straight to police to turn themselves in and admit what the others did, I doubt they'd be charged with murder themselves.
Not 1 of them turned himself or his friends in. They were trying to get away with it.
If one of them went straight to police to turn themselves in and admit what the others did, I doubt they'd be charged with murder themselves.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 2:58 pm to baldona
quote:
I could be wrong, but I doubt they knew there was a kid in there until they were already driving away.
Doesn't matter if they didn't know. Say two people go into a store to rob it, only one has a gun. He draws it and the store owner draws his gun and shoots and kills the robber with the gun. The other thief is charged with murder of the thief that pulled the gun. Accountability. This may not be the same in every state, but from what I understand from law enforcement in Mississippi this is the case.
This post was edited on 5/22/17 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 5/22/17 at 3:02 pm to TimeOutdoors
quote:
Doesn't matter if they didn't know.
Agree 100%. It doesn't matter one bit that they didn't know he was back there. There was absolutely no reason to kill him, or even harm him. He was fricking 6 years old.
Whatever they would be facing for GTA or whatever other charges wouldn't be as bad as capital murder.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 3:05 pm to anc
Glad to see there isn't a Judge Trudy White on the bench in that district.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 3:07 pm to anc
I know the common answers, but still, one has to think how in the hell you get to a point that by 18 you are a murderer, or an accessory to one. Of a 6yr old to boot.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 3:09 pm to anc
The whole deal has so much dumb in it. These guys DROVE into the parking lot in a car. Then, they stole the running car. I'm not sure who got into the stolen car. I assume the driver of the car they arrived in followed the driver of the stolen car. What was the point of stealing the car when they were in a car? Did they need a second car?
Then, there's a sleeping kid in the car, so rather than ditch it and run, one of them shot the child multiple times and they left the stolen car and hauled buns.
I read an article this morning in which the DA or maybe it was the police spokesman said they have no reason to believe this was anything but a random carjacking gone way south. So much dumb!
Then, there's a sleeping kid in the car, so rather than ditch it and run, one of them shot the child multiple times and they left the stolen car and hauled buns.
I read an article this morning in which the DA or maybe it was the police spokesman said they have no reason to believe this was anything but a random carjacking gone way south. So much dumb!
Posted on 5/22/17 at 3:09 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Another thing, all 3 saw the murder of a 6 year old happen.
Not 1 of them turned himself or his friends in. They were trying to get away with it.
If one of them went straight to police to turn themselves in and admit what the others did, I doubt they'd be charged with murder themselves.
This! Clearly these dumbasses don't value life or have enough sense that the kid didn't need to die.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 3:10 pm to tigers win2
quote:
Glad to see there isn't a Judge Trudy White on the bench in that district.
You did see that one of these 3 had already been released on bail for an armed robbery charge and was awaiting trial when this happened. I believe his bail was $25,000.
Edited: $2500 to $25,000
This post was edited on 5/22/17 at 3:22 pm
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News