Started By
Message

re: Mother arrested at South Carolina Kroger for cursing in front of kids.

Posted on 8/15/14 at 12:40 pm to
Posted by BlackleafBaller
Member since Oct 2012
1863 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 12:40 pm to

quote:

Wouldn't this be like the definition of a free speech violation?

I don't believe so because of this:

According to Salon, which looked up the city ordinance, disorderly conduct is defined as "riotous conduct of any kind," "cry[ing] out in a noisy, scandalous, or abusive manner" in a public place, or "utter[ing], while in a state of anger, in the presence of another, any bawdy, lewd, or obscene words or epithets."

For example: you can't scream "Fire!" in a movie theatre if there isn't one because it'll cause a panic. That clause is saying that cursing in public is "riotous". I'm assuming that is how they get away with it.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69078 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:18 pm to
what is odd, is that the people (I mean group) that would want to see "curse words" as the thing of a past(meaning there are no curse words), is the same group that demonized words against gays, short people and minorities.

The side that is for the curse word rules and thinks they are a good idea, is the side that thinks words should be protected by free speech.

What you really get it another case of both sides wanting the same freedoms and the same restrictions. But with exceptions.


So many points are like this. Both political sides want controls and freedoms while acting like they only want freedom.


This post was edited on 8/15/14 at 2:23 pm
Posted by cleeveclever
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
2046 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:27 pm to
I was shopping in the produce section at Albertsons once and a lady was waiting in line to get some chicken wings or something. She had a cute little boy with her. He couldn't have been more than two, if that old.

He was excitedly walking around to the produce that was nearby and pointing at the apples and saying "ball! ball!"

His clearly angry mother warned him to not touch the fruit and to come back over to where she was standing.

He picked up an apple and held it out and with a huge smile on his face said "mama, ball! ball!"

She darted over to him, jerked the apple out of his hand violently, jerked him by the arm violently, got about an inch from his face and said "listen to me you little mother f****, you better listen to me when I god*** tell you not to do something"

The little boy immediately crumpled to the floor in, what I assume was fear or possibly a learned reaction to physical abuse.

Anyway, she dragged him by his arm back into line.

I could just see the childlike purity drain from his face.

It was profoundly sad.

Posted by BlackleafBaller
Member since Oct 2012
1863 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:33 pm to
Wait...Did you get that backwards?
Posted by BlackleafBaller
Member since Oct 2012
1863 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:38 pm to
Yeah...I'm not saying that cussing in front of kids (or especially directly at them) isn't trashy or unethical. However, it shouldn't be illegal where you can be detained solely for using the word itself.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28344 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 2:08 pm to
Absolutely terrible reporting.

quote:

But somehow the police were called, and Wolf ended up getting arrested in the incident late Sunday.


Somehow? Don't you think important part of the story? The writer wants us to believe that this lady was arrested solely because the used profanity in front of her children. Maybe I'm just skeptical by nature, but I seriously doubt that was the case. Somewhere in the author's "somehow" we're missing a large part of the story. Maybe I'm going out on a limb here, but I suspect this "victim" became antagonistic with the other woman who "expressed her displeasure at the situation". I would be willing to bet that the police "somehow" showed up because they were called to address a (probably pretty heated) argument in the store, and that this woman was arrested because she remained atagonistic (justifiably or not) when the cops showed up.

But hey, why let "minor" facts get in the way of sensationalist journalism, right?
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69078 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 2:21 pm to
Yep I flubbed it. oh well.
Posted by Amazing Moves
Member since Jan 2014
6044 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 2:51 pm to
More civil rights falling by the way side.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
19451 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 3:06 pm to
Bet her fat arse will think twice before she starts dropping F bombs in public again.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
19451 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 3:07 pm to
Bet her fat arse will think twice before she starts dropping F bombs in public again.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Somehow? Don't you think important part of the story? The writer wants us to believe that this lady was arrested solely because the used profanity in front of her children. Maybe I'm just skeptical by nature, but I seriously doubt that was the case. Somewhere in the author's "somehow" we're missing a large part of the story. Maybe I'm going out on a limb here, but I suspect this "victim" became antagonistic with the other woman who "expressed her displeasure at the situation". I would be willing to bet that the police "somehow" showed up because they were called to address a (probably pretty heated) argument in the store, and that this woman was arrested because she remained atagonistic (justifiably or not) when the cops showed up.

But hey, why let "minor" facts get in the way of sensationalist journalism, right?

quote:

Alt26


Holy Christ!!!

Please point out one fact in your idiotic post?
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28344 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

Holy Christ!!!

Please point out one fact in your idiotic post?


The point is that there are no facts to indicate why the police where called. The story insinuates that the cops were called simply because this lady used profanity in front of her children. I seriously doubt the store managers, or whoever, called the police solely because a lady was using profanity. This is only bolstered by the fact that the article doesn't say exactly why the police were called, only that "somehow" the police were called. What's more likely? That the cops were called because a lady used bad language, or that the cops were called because a argument between customers took place?

From the sparse details given in the story do we know for a fact that an argument took place? No. This of course is why my post used such language as "I suspect" or "I would be willing to bet" as opposed to definitive statements. However, you are a complete fool, or unbelievably naive if you thinks cops got involved in this SOLELY because a lady allegedly used profanity. In fact, the brief quote from the other shopper suggest that my suspected version of what happen actually is the real reason this woman was arrested:

quote:

"But the shopper denies having a bad day, and says Wolf used profanity repeatedly — and even cursed at her after she approached the family to complain."


Sorry if I don't take every "I was unjustly arrested" bullshite story at face value.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

She says her husband kept squishing the bread in their cart by putting frozen pizzas on top of it


Three pages and no one asked why they were putting the bread in the main basket of the cart?

The kid holder is for the bread and eggs...everything else goes in the main basket.
Posted by piratedude
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2009
2501 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 6:48 pm to
let me check my pocket constitution. yep, right here, freedom of speech.

frick the po-leese
Posted by ItsAllGucci
Member since Aug 2014
95 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 6:48 pm to
This is why I shop at publix...
Posted by TIGRLEE
Northeast Louisiana
Member since Nov 2009
31493 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 7:05 pm to
Cussing around kids in a public place not trashy huh ?
Posted by Tigris
Mexican Home
Member since Jul 2005
12357 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

According to Salon


What they reported, sure that's over the top.

But there is almost certainly more to this store in order for the cops to get called. Even in South Carolina.

And Salon as the source doesn't help the credibility much. They facking hate anything to do with South Carolina.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram