Started By
Message

re: More details coming out about USS Fitzgerald collision (with a pic of the inside damage)

Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:16 am to
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78086 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Now yall are just screwing with me.
clear the cache and come back to this thread Einstein
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:17 am to
Ok, now it shows up in the OP.

Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78086 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Ok, now it shows up in the OP.
he changed the source
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64661 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:18 am to
That did not explain anything.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51290 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:18 am to
quote:

clear the cache and come back to this thread Einstein


No need to be an a-hole considering that I've been posting threads with images on this website for years now with no issues.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 9:19 am
Posted by SamuelClemens
Earth
Member since Feb 2015
11727 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:18 am to
Looks like a busted up aluminum window panel
Posted by Waffle House
NYC
Member since Aug 2008
3945 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:18 am to
quote:

What happened?

The owner of this website (news.usni.org) does not allow hotlinking to that resource (/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/unnamed-3.jpg).


Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78086 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:19 am to
quote:

No need to be an a-hole considering that I've been posting threads with images on this website for years now.
wow that's amazing
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26640 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:19 am to
OK, the folks aboard the cargo ship were asleep at the wheel, literally.

What about the folks aboard the Fitz? Not only should there have been people on watch, but there should also have been some kind of radar or other electronic surveillance, shouldn't there?

Someone had to know a VERY LARGE vessel was approaching. Someone should have been aware and given an order to change course. I would think the Fitzgerald would be a lot more maneuverable than that freaking cargo ship.

This is just bizarre.
Posted by Rhino5
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2014
28899 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:20 am to
quote:

with a pic of the inside damage

Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
79139 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:21 am to
quote:

I couldn't imagine being the officer who gave the order to seal those sailors in the flooded area.
so pretty much like in crimson tide
Posted by Rhino5
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2014
28899 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:23 am to
quote:


This is just bizarre.

I was deployed on ship for 6 months. The radar system captures every ship from hundreds of miles out. There's no way they missed a giant cargo ship.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34157 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Someone had to know a VERY LARGE vessel was approaching


And no collision alert or general quarters alarm was sounded. This is beyond understandable. This is dereliction of duty that led to seven deaths.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98188 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:29 am to
Capt. Benson probably wishes there had been eight at this point.
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18906 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:14 am to
I happened to be at a party a couple of days after this event with several licensed ocean going Captains and a couple of retired Navy officers discussing this incident.

I can't recount everything they said because much of it was technical in nature but the overwhelming consensus was exactly what y'all are saying. WTF? How could this happen?

There are multiple systems in place to prevent something like this. I even learned that the lowly VHF radio that every baw has on their center console continuously transmits GPS data that larger ships systems receive and plot collision avoidance. If a 20' center console has an avoidance system, how did this happen to a Navy Destroyer?
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3015 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:27 am to
It would/should have been very, very, clear to at least 10 people on the Fitzgerald that a large ship was approaching at a zero bearing rate. Even a lookout could have caught seeing both the port and starboard running lights simultaneously in time to act.

In other news, I'm betting there's at least 20 parodies of this song being developed on ships and submarines throughout the fleet at the moment....


Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:28 am to
quote:

how did this happen to a Navy Destroyer?

Exactly, and that's what the investigation will hopefully reveal. The destroyer would have all of the bridge crew that should have seen the giant arse container ship on their instruments. There are lookouts that are putting eyes on the ocean that should have seen it. The ship's combat information center should have been lit the frick up about the looming threat to the destroyer and been screaming at the bridge.

It's just unfathomable that the whole system just broke down and nobody acted in enough time to get that destroyer off its collision course.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 3:31 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98188 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:33 am to
quote:

It's just unfathomable that the whole system just broke down and nobody acted in enough time to get that destroyer off its collision course.


Hypothetical: It's so unfathomable that even though they saw it, they didn't "see" it. The lookouts didn't expect to see a big arse ship bearing down on them so they didn't. The watchstanders figured the alarms were malfunctions so they turned them off, etc. Systems break down, and the more complex the system, the more catastrophic the breakdown.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 10:36 am
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18906 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:34 am to
On another note, the Captain went to bed in his stateroom as a Navy Officer at the pinnacle of his career commanding the world's finest floating warship. Woke up outside the skin of the ship with a critical head injury and no job. His arse is getting fired no matter who fricked up.

Or as one of the retired Navy Officers told me. "He won't be fired in the sense it is used in the private sector. It is just that he is going to be put in command of the Navy Recruiting Center in Lawton, OK with two enlisted guys who previously did something equally as egregious."

Really blows for the Captain.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30556 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:49 am to
quote:

I couldn't imagine being the officer who gave the order to seal those sailors in the flooded area.


No different than sending brave young men out on a mission you know they have little chance of surviving. Commanding young men in those situations is not for the faint of heart.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram