- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mike Brown attempted to take officer's gun
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:29 am to The Third Leg
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:29 am to The Third Leg
Exactly. He's a hired gun.
1
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:33 am to StrongSafety
Look, I've got no problem with disenfranchised folks assuming the cops were lying. To not think that cops take advantage of poor or minority folks because they can is to not be a realist. Not all cops, all the time, but plenty do.
That said, Mike Brown, based on the video I saw previous to his death, was acting like a punk-arse thug.
The cop had no previous issues regarding civil rights or use of force complaints. With MB's blood inside the car, I think the "eyewitnesses" are straight up lying.
That said, Mike Brown, based on the video I saw previous to his death, was acting like a punk-arse thug.
The cop had no previous issues regarding civil rights or use of force complaints. With MB's blood inside the car, I think the "eyewitnesses" are straight up lying.
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:34 am to The Third Leg
I thought we already knew he was shot in the hand inside or just outside the vehicle, before he fled. The issue is the shots that came later.
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:39 am to Cooter Davenport
quote:
Hired gun
He did this Brown autopsy pro bono.
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:40 am to StrongSafety
quote:
It's always amusing to see how much the OT wants the cops to win these cases. I don't understand why
Because there is only one witness who happened to be Brown's best friend giving an obviously objective account of what happened
And all the stupidity that followed
This post was edited on 10/22/14 at 10:42 am
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:43 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
Because there is only one witness who happened to be Brown's best friend
There were several witnesses to the fatal shot(s).
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:44 am to Speedy G
One of which is on home video corroborating Wilson's story to a T
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:49 am to Professor Parks
Any sane person knew this when it happened.
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:52 am to kywildcatfanone
Well guess I'm not sane then
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:53 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
One of which is on home video corroborating Wilson's story to a T
Link?
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:55 am to Speedy G
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:58 am to VetteGuy
quote:
ook, I've got no problem with disenfranchised folks assuming the cops were lying
Disenfranchised? Really? I'm not sure you know what that word means. Show me evidence where blacks in St. Louis are legally barred from voting.
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:59 am to Professor Parks
I was surprised at the results of the online MSNBC Poll:
In your opinion, should Officer Darren Wilson be indicted for the shooting death of Michael Brown?
85% No (40K votes)
10% Yes (4,700 votes)
5% Not enough info ($2,500 votes)
In your opinion, should Officer Darren Wilson be indicted for the shooting death of Michael Brown?
85% No (40K votes)
10% Yes (4,700 votes)
5% Not enough info ($2,500 votes)
Posted on 10/22/14 at 11:03 am to ClientNumber9
Honestly none of this shite matters. All that matters is what was Mike Brown doing when the fatal shots were administered. Was he physically and verbally surrendering when he was killed?All that happens before that is pure conjecture.
He was unarmed. He had no weapon that could cause the officer fatal harm on him. Once that fact was established its all on the officer.
He's the one with the gun therefore the burden falls on him.
He was unarmed. He had no weapon that could cause the officer fatal harm on him. Once that fact was established its all on the officer.
He's the one with the gun therefore the burden falls on him.
This post was edited on 10/22/14 at 11:03 am
Posted on 10/22/14 at 11:04 am to RDRGeaux09
Then I wonder how Wilson had his face smashed in. You're right. Brown posed no threat to Officer Wilson.
Posted on 10/22/14 at 11:06 am to RDRGeaux09
So the fact that the dude beat the cop's face in and tried to take his gun has no bearing on the cop shooting him? Yea, that makes sense.
Posted on 10/22/14 at 11:07 am to RDRGeaux09
Posted on 10/22/14 at 11:08 am to ClientNumber9
The officer has the gun. He has all the power.
There's no prof that Wilson had his face smashed in. Where are the hospital records of that happening?
There's no prof that Wilson had his face smashed in. Where are the hospital records of that happening?
Posted on 10/22/14 at 11:08 am to RDRGeaux09
If Mike charged him, then the officers training will back him up. Mike of covered 20 ft within seconds and that's enough to tackle and kill someone.
Charge a Cop, Lose your Top
Charge a Cop, Lose your Top
Posted on 10/22/14 at 11:10 am to tketaco
So ur saying he charged the officer with a gun in slippers and baggy shorts? That's what ur asking me to believe.
Page 4 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News