Started By
Message

re: Kermit Ruffins' sister asking for donations to bury her daughter

Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:46 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278665 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

everything is insignificant in a school setting in the internet age if you want to look only at the surface



not really, just your bad examples. Are they applicable in life? Yes. Did i become proficient in them by my high school science classes? frick no x10.


would be quite difficult to learn what I learned in an English class via the internet. Same with math.


quote:

the concepts i listed are building blocks that ultimately lead to the ability to improve yourself and understanding of the world




huh? say what? learning "how to cook" via science class, or learning about diets and medicine are building blocks? or help me understand the world?

I know what you are trying to say. But as i said, your examples were just bad, which just further proves my point how insignificant those classes truly were.


quote:

when you limit education to surface-level topics with endpoints, you basically doom that student to those end points



science and history have end points. usually when those classes end. But definitely end when you are finished with school.
Posted by ladytiger118
Member since Aug 2009
20922 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

donating to sub-Saharan Africa

I've always thought that it was better to donate within your own community to local charities. The changes you make in your community will have a bigger impact on your life IMO. Plus I prefer knowing where my money is going to. In most African countries the money is taken by the military/dictator in charge.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83951 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

giving is a very complex topic. the vast majority of the time it is a bad move. there are some instances where i could see it being valid. this belief that "giving is always good" is very simplistic and can lead to very evil results (see: the welfare state and our ghettos and trailer parks).


Of course. It's not an absolute, but I disagree that it's a bad thing a "vast majority" of the time. And keep in mind that systematic programs like those you mentioned are a microcosm of the idea of giving, and that one could argue that such programs are more of a diserrvice to the ideal than they are a product of it.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278665 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Thats a pretty big decision to be left in the hands of a kid that might be around 9-14 years old.



im talking more high school aged kids. You have to fill the elementary curriculum with something, so it might as well be that. You aren't going to teach the "life lesson" courses im talking about to elementary aged kids.

In a perfect world you can teach them science and history, etc, and if they take an interest in it, can continue to learn about it in high school.


Posted by glassman
Next to the beer taps at Finn's
Member since Oct 2008
116173 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

giving is a very complex topic.


It is and that is why I give anonymously and to people I have never met. This has been a really good thread. No bullshite and calling out of posters.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423375 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

huh? say what? learning "how to cook" via science class, or learning about diets and medicine are building blocks? or help me understand the world?

no. understanding biology and chemistry opens up the world so you can better understand things like cooking, medicine, diet, exercise, etc

but history opens up philosophy and sociology which opens up self identification and all sorts of existential analysis

you can't understand yourself if you don't understand basics of humanity. you can't learn the basics of humanity without history

quote:

science and history have end points. usually when those classes end. But definitely end when you are finished with school.

not for people who seek education. as jones pointed out, if you give up early, it's very difficult to catch up later
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

but history opens up philosophy and sociology which opens up self identification and all sorts of existential analysis you can't understand yourself if you don't understand basics of humanity. you can't learn the basics of humanity without history


You can get all this just from reading the OT
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:53 pm to
Bring back home-ec!

Keep science and history too.
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
97710 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:55 pm to
I took home ec in high school


Class full of chicks? Sign me up
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278665 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

but history opens up philosophy and sociology which opens up self identification and all sorts of existential analysis




history shouldn't by synonymous with philosophy and sociology.

at least they werent categorized together where I went to school.


quote:

no. understanding biology and chemistry opens up the world so you can better understand things like cooking, medicine, diet, exercise, etc



you can't truly believe this dude. Ive seen you post long enough on board to observe that just recently you've come to learn about at least 3 things on that list, and Id be willing to bet your 9th grade chemistry class in 1998 had zero do with that, and that the internet has played a huge role in your new found knowledge.


quote:

you can't understand yourself if you don't understand basics of humanity. you can't learn the basics of humanity without history



pure bullshite


quote:

not for people who seek education. as jones pointed out, if you give up early, it's very difficult to catch up later




Im not saying give up at all at a young age. Im saying let the high school aged kids choose whether they want to "give up" or not, or focus on something that they may feel could help them in college and later in life.
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:59 pm to
They got rid of it about 5 years before I started. Shame. I had to teach girls how to write a check. So many girls can't cook. Home ec was/is needed.
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63517 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:01 pm to
Most people are at least killed for some motive. There doesn't seem to be any reason behind this one.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:01 pm to
My sister taught Home Ec a few years ago at Zachary High. She had to quit to raise her kids though. Now she has a side business sewing drapes and curtains. She's more domesticated than Martha Stewart.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278665 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

So many girls can't cook. Home ec was/is needed



worthless without chemistry

/sarcasm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423375 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Im not saying give up at all at a young age. Im saying let the high school aged kids choose whether they want to "give up" or not, or focus on something that they may feel could help them in college and later in life.

you're basically creating different types of high schools

as long as the kids understand which path they're choosing, i don't care
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
97710 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:03 pm to
I don't know how popular it would be these days the way stay at home moms are looked down upon.
Posted by ladytiger118
Member since Aug 2009
20922 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:03 pm to
Home ec was mandatory at my high school.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423375 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

worthless without chemistry

/sarcasm

one reason home ec has died is because we actually allow women to become educated and they now outnumber men in college and in terms of college graudation
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120389 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:05 pm to
What percentage of your income do you save slow?
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278665 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

as long as the kids understand which path they're choosing, i don't care



im all for that. I just feel like a different curriculum could help them narrow it down easier. For some kids that isn't a problem. For a good bit of them though, it is.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram