- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In your opinion, did OJ kill Brown and Goldman?
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:39 pm to MegaTiger3
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:39 pm to MegaTiger3
His former agent alleges that he got high one night and admitted to it. Plus, he was ruled responsible in the civil trial - which was basically the criminal trial minus the race baiting, theatrics, all black jury, and incompetent judge.
2
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:45 pm to The Mick
quote:
People still talk about it because Netflix and others keep making money by pumping out documentaries. Americans are sick fricks.
People gives Johnnie Cochran gets all the credit for getting him off and assumes that one line he said about the gloves is what won the case for OJ, but there are two things that played a bigger factor.
- The jury, who deliberated over the verdict for only several hours (i think it was what? 3 or 4 hours).
- The fear of nationwide rioting, especially L.A. because of the L.A. riots that took place after the officers who beat Rodney King, were found innocent.
The jury had been there much longer than anticipated and were ready to get back to their lives, etc.. This affected decision making.. If OJ didn't kill Brown and Goldman, based on the evidence that was available, then who did?
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:45 pm to MegaTiger3
Yes with the help of his son
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:46 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
shite I'm not a prosecutor but I could have won this case
quote:
You assume having a jury that is actually using the facts to come to a decision
Fair point but the prosecution team allowed the trial to become a smoke & mirror show
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:47 pm to MegaTiger3
Yes
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:47 pm to Wtodd
With the help of his son?? Hell no man the kid was like 6 or 7 at the time if that.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:49 pm to MegaTiger3
No & I'm assuming you were replying to someone else
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:51 pm to MegaTiger3
quote:
2 ladies were convinced he was innocent while the man thought he was guilty
I know this is anecdotal but this actually seems pretty common. I've known a few women that think he's innocent. I'm curious as to why there seems to be a really gender divide on this.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:51 pm to The Mick
quote:
I remember watching Chris Rock comedy special shortly afterwards. Crowd was probably 95% black and he whips then into a frenzy saying "OJ innocent" "OJ is innocent my brothers and sisters".. after he gets them good and worked up he says "Are you fricking crazy? That n*** is guilty as hell"...
I remember this one with Chris Rock "I aint saying its right, but I understand"
LINK
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:51 pm to MegaTiger3
Yes I'm sure he killed them but don't think he meant to. I don't think he really was meaning to cut Nichole's throat. I think he was really just trying to cut Ron's dick off.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:52 pm to Wtodd
OJ killed them in a fit of drunken rage
Have you listened to police recordings during the infamous chase in the white bronco? He didn't overtly admit to killing them but he knew his goose was cooked. Just like a guilty man facing preponderous evidence against him knows he is facing life in prison.
Have you listened to police recordings during the infamous chase in the white bronco? He didn't overtly admit to killing them but he knew his goose was cooked. Just like a guilty man facing preponderous evidence against him knows he is facing life in prison.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:53 pm to MegaTiger3
I'd be willing to bet that the two people who were convinced that he did not do it, are completely ignorant to the facts of the case. I would also make another prediction about them, but I won't
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:53 pm to MegaTiger3
quote:
Hell no man the kid was like 6 or 7 at the time if that.
He was around 24
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:54 pm to JBeam
quote:
Wouldn't shock me if he killed them or if he hired someone to kill her. Goldman was clearly in the wrong place at the wrong time. Unfortunately.
Maybe but he was definitely screwing OJ's ex at the time and was possibly coming over for a hook up. Mark Fuhrman reported in his book that it was common knowledge to LAPD that they had a sexual relationship and OJ had expressed displeasure to friends that he had heard the rumors and that he was pissed that Goldman was seen driving the Ferrari OJ bought for his wife.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:55 pm to JohnDeere
quote:
Yes I'm sure he killed them but don't think he meant to. I don't think he really was meaning to cut Nichole's throat. I think he was really just trying to cut Ron's dick off.
Watch that Chris Rock video... I think he meant to..
But seriously, I think he meant to do it.. and that's just not my opinion because of the Chris Rock video.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:57 pm to MegaTiger3
Yep.
Nobody else would have that kind of rage.
People who kill stranger like that would keep killing.
Nobody else would have that kind of rage.
People who kill stranger like that would keep killing.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:58 pm to OweO
I think that followed the line I posted but I could be wrong... dude is a trip for sure.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 12:59 pm to MegaTiger3
Incompetence by the prosecution, loss of control by the judge, spectacular theatrics and tactics by the defense, and expert jury selection by the defense to put a manipulable and unsophisticated jury in the box led to OJ walking.
OJ murdered those people to death.
OJ murdered those people to death.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:00 pm to MegaTiger3
for the love of god. There's a documentary that shows his deposition from the civil case. There will be no doubt after you see what he's asked and how he responds.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:01 pm to MegaTiger3
Yes, based on the blood evidence, which even members of the defense team were bothered by. It is very far-fetched to think Fuhrman planted OJ's blood at the scene, Goldman's blood in the Bronco, and Nicole and Goldman's blood on OJ's sock and place the sock in OJ's bedroom.
The defense did an excellent job putting just enough reasonable doubt out there, mostly centered around the gloves and Fuhrman's racism, to avoid conviction.
I would highly recoommend watching ther FX series, "The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story", which is now on Netflix. Gives great insight into not just OJ but into the minds of the lawyers and their tactics.
The defense did an excellent job putting just enough reasonable doubt out there, mostly centered around the gloves and Fuhrman's racism, to avoid conviction.
I would highly recoommend watching ther FX series, "The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story", which is now on Netflix. Gives great insight into not just OJ but into the minds of the lawyers and their tactics.
This post was edited on 2/14/17 at 1:07 pm
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News