Started By
Message

How well regarded was General Patton before the movie "Patton"?

Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:51 am
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31910 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:51 am
I wasn't born until 19 yrs after the movie came out, and I've always thought of Patton as the best American General in the war.

Was that how he was thought of before the movie? Or did the movie change people's perspective?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89511 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:56 am to
quote:

Was that how he was thought of before the movie?


He's widely regarded as one of America's top generals - as a battlefield, combat commander, he is up there with Washington and Confederate generals Lee and Jackson.

The movie (one of my favorite, by the way) - attempted to make him look bad (recall that was during the Vietnam War), but it backfired - he became more popular than ever.
Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
108740 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:01 am to
I know the Germans feared and respected the shite out of him. They couldn't believe that we would actually pull him from the war over something as dumb as slapping a piss ant private... which is really fricking stupid when you think about it. Removing your best battlefield commander for slapping a crybaby... dumb.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31910 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:02 am to
The movie attempted to make him look bad?
It makes him look like an incredible leader with strict unwavering rules, and the only general the Germans were afraid of.
If anything it makes the rest of the Allies look bad by not giving him more power
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 7:04 am
Posted by LSU0358
Member since Jan 2005
7918 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:04 am to
quote:

over something as dumb as slapping a piss ant private... which is really fricking stupid when you think about it


In defense of Eisenhower, the slap was just the straw that broke the camels back. Patton had trouble keeping his mouth shut around the media.
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:04 am to
quote:

They couldn't believe that we would actually pull him from the war over something as dumb as slapping a piss ant private... which is really fricking stupid when you think about it. Removing your best battlefield commander for slapping a crybaby... dumb.


And people say there was no PC in the 40's...
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89511 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:10 am to
quote:

The movie attempted to make him look bad? It makes him look like an incredible leader with strict unwavering rules, and the only general the Germans were afraid of.


Well, Omar Bradley was the technical advisor and they did want (successfully) to show the contrast, but they also wanted the average 20-something hippie boomer to "tsk, tsk" his lust for glory, relative disregard for casualties, slapping the PTSD cases, pro-Nazi stance, etc.

It backfired, while winning 7 Oscars (despite not having a female speaking role).
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31910 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:12 am to
I dk man, I get the whole tough general refusing to suffer cowards thing...
But he slapped 2 soldiers suffering mental trauma and probably PTSD and threw them out of the hospital, that wasn't a good idea
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28164 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:14 am to
quote:

winning 7 Oscars (despite not having a female speaking role


Coincidence?

I think not.
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25194 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:25 am to
quote:

Omar Bradley



Bradley was as bad as Montgomery, but no one ever talks about it. One of the biggest myths about Bradley is how he was a "GI General"
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:28 am to
quote:

But he slapped 2 soldiers suffering mental trauma and probably PTSD and threw them out of the hospital, that wasn't a good idea


There was no such thing as PTSD in WWII. I think it was still "battle fatigue" or some such thing. And he wasn't going to allow them to defile that place by staying alongside soldiers who had been wounded in battle!!!

He thought that if he could shame a coward, he could help him regain some of his self respect.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31910 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:28 am to

quote:

Bradley was as bad as Montgomery, but no one ever talks about it. One of the biggest myths about Bradley is how he was a "GI General"




I'm not saying you're wrong, but what are you basing that on?
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 7:29 am
Posted by GrammarKnotsi
Member since Feb 2013
9339 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:31 am to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89511 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:40 am to
quote:

Bradley was as bad as Montgomery


Meh - he was the main ground forces commander for Overlord, greenlit Cobra, Dragoon and Market-Garden (although that was everybody) - if anything, they were overly aggressive with Market-Garden. Both he and Monty get a knock for being too passive, but part of that is because of this film we're discussing in the thread. Monty was aggressive at times in Afrika and both guys recognized that Patton's success was due to speed, pressure and aggressiveness.

The guy was as good an opertional/strategic ground force commander as we've had since the Civil War. Not the Operational/Tactical genius that Patton was, but definitely the best guy we had for that job at that time.
Posted by rumproast
Member since Dec 2003
12094 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:40 am to
My grandfather told me that the sentiment of most the men was that if they could have gotten a clear shot at him, they'd have probably taken it...
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98180 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:43 am to
One of my great uncles served in Third Army and didn't have anything good to say about him. He was always regarded as a tactical genius and one of the best combat commanders the United States ever produced. But IYAM the movie minimized some of his negative qualities. It did show one of the soldier slapping incidents (there were two), but glossed over his fixation on meaningless bullshite, such as soldiers having an immaculate uniform in a combat zone. And there was nothing about the foolhardy operation behind German lines to try to rescue his POW son-in-law, that got a lot of men needlessly killed.

The movie also ficitonalizes the relationship between Patton and Bradley. In the movie, Bradley is often exasperated, but regards Patton somewhat affectionately. IRL, Bradley didn't like Patton at all.

Lightning Joe Collins was Patton's equal as a commander, without all Patton's bullshittery. But the general public has never heard of Collins because he wasn't flamboyant enough to have a movie.
Posted by H.M. Murdock
B.A.'s Van
Member since Feb 2013
2113 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:45 am to
quote:

My grandfather told me that the sentiment of most the men was that if they could have gotten a clear shot at him, they'd have probably taken it...


Likely because most of his men didn't understand that the aggressive tactics Patton employed helped keep them alive.

Patton understood the future or warfare, truly a great field commander.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Was that how he was thought of before the movie?
"Great General. They should make a movie about him. I'd watch it."
Posted by FreeState
Member since Jun 2012
3169 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 8:18 am to
I personally knew a couple of old WWII vets who served under General Patton and both spoke highly of him. One in particular teared up when he spoke of him. He told me of a personal experience of being in Patton's presence when the General said something along the lines of "we're going in and get our boys out if we all have to die", not quoting exactly but something like that.
Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 8:21 am to
quote:

How well regarded was General Patton before the movie "Patton"? by Tiger1242


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram