Started By
Message

From the LASIK thread (are reading glasses req'd later?)

Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:55 pm
Posted by NASA_ISS_Tiger
Huntsville, Al via Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2005
7983 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:55 pm
Any of you fellers that had LASIK surgery long ago had to start wearing reading glasses yet? Especially those older than 35 years old?

Doc told me as soon as I got the surgery my nearsightedness would go away but I'd have to wear glasses to read (which isn't a bad thing).

So I figured I'd ask some folks who already had the surgery.
This post was edited on 7/3/17 at 2:21 pm
Posted by jscrims
Lost
Member since May 2008
3554 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:56 pm to
They made me fill out a form which said I was going to need reading glasses.
Posted by NASA_ISS_Tiger
Huntsville, Al via Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2005
7983 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

They made me fill out a form which said I was going to need reading glasses.


Have you honestly needed them yet?
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72598 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 1:01 pm to
you got ripped off. I use reading glasses and i didn't even have surgery.
Posted by Nawlens Gator
louisiana
Member since Sep 2005
5836 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 1:02 pm to

Dr Brint (sp?) on Veterans Blvd made my two eyes different. One to see far away, and the other to focus up close. Some how my brain sorts it all out and I can't tell (and don't remember) which eye is for which distance. That was 25 yrs ago and I don't wear reading glasses yet.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
25946 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 1:03 pm to
I don't wear reading glasses but I feel like I need regular glasses again. I had it about 8 yrs ago.
Posted by TheFonz
Somewhere in Louisiana
Member since Jul 2016
20402 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 1:16 pm to
Both of my parents had radial keratotomy back in the early 90's. It took about twenty years but both ended up needing reading glasses. It's no big deal though; they can get by with those cheap ones you buy in the store.
Posted by msflower
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2011
470 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 1:22 pm to
LASIK this year and no readying glasses. I'm older than 35
Posted by NASA_ISS_Tiger
Huntsville, Al via Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2005
7983 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

you got ripped off. I use reading glasses and i didn't even have surgery.


I haven't had the surgery yet. I wear contacts for nearsightedness but I find it hard to read sometimes with my contacts in...so Dr. told me the LASIK would cure the distance but not the reading stuff. I was just curious as to what others have experienced.
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
31082 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 1:37 pm to
My wife had it in hear early thirties. Had to start wearing reading glasses about 10 years later.
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
39025 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 1:45 pm to
I thought astronauts couldn't have eye surgery.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53815 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 1:49 pm to
I had it around 10 years ago. I've just started to need reading glasses in the last six months. I'm a man. I'm 50.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 1:50 pm to
I had one eye remain slightly nearsighted this helped me avoid reading glasses until my mid 50s. Since the Docs are having people sign papers about needing reading glasses at a later date, it seems that a lot of people did not understand that LASIK only corrects refractive errors caused by incorrect shape of the eye's lens. Needing reading glasses as you age is because the muscles used to change the focal range of your eye get weak, LASIK does nothing to prevent this.
Posted by NASA_ISS_Tiger
Huntsville, Al via Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2005
7983 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 2:23 pm to
Oh I totally realize this, but I was just curious with the small sample size here as to how many actually need the glasses or not. I personally don't care if I need them or not, I think it'll be great not to have to wear glasses/contacts for regular stuff..and only need them up close.
Posted by NASA_ISS_Tiger
Huntsville, Al via Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2005
7983 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

I thought astronauts couldn't have eye surgery.


I have no clue. I'm an engineer.
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72598 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:05 pm to
My wife (no pics) had lasik and now wears readers again.
Posted by covlatiger
Member since Feb 2006
2321 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 4:00 pm to
I had mine done about 12 years ago. At the time, the doc said I could go back and have one of the eyes done so I would not need readers. Never went back for that.

Overall a good experience, nice not needing glasses for distance. I just use the cheap readers from dollar tree.
Posted by pcolatiger28
Pensacola, Fl
Member since Apr 2009
1284 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 4:14 pm to
So you're saying that LASIK itself doesn't cause the need for reading glasses, it's something that would happen anyway? I'm thinking of getting it but the whole eye change possibility in 8-10 years and reading glasses has me second guessing. I'm fine with contacts but obviously being able to wake up and see would be sweet.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30037 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 4:17 pm to
after about 10 years "many" people have bad vision again.

the problem is they cant do it again, you can only do it once in your life and that is it.

often you can go back to glasses if you are lucky but in my case I cant. the only way I can see good again is to wear glasses and contacts at the same time (special made $600 contacts at that) and then I can ONLY see at a fixed distance about 20 ft in front of me for driving.

I am blind as far as being able to read anything, I cant tell if its a man or woman im looking at if they are closer the 15 ft or more the 25 ft away. in short I see worse with glasses and contacts except for a set distance within about 10 feet where I can see 20/20

for the most part I am "less blind" without the glasses and special contacts, by just seeing everything blurry all the time and I use reading glasses for reading. I am legally blind in right eye and the left eye isn't too bad but its not 20 vision, its more like 50 vision with blurry edges and no fine detail.

I would never do it if I could go back, as bad as my vision used to be, and it was pretty thick lenses, I could still see everything 20/20 at any distance and read well with them
This post was edited on 7/3/17 at 4:26 pm
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53815 posts
Posted on 7/3/17 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

So you're saying that LASIK itself doesn't cause the need for reading glasses, it's something that would happen anyway?


Exactly. The doctor will explain it all at the consultation.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram