- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: First Indigenous SI Model
Posted on 5/15/22 at 3:33 pm to crazy4lsu
Posted on 5/15/22 at 3:33 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
I'm begging you to go look up the definition. It literally includes a temporal reference. Are you suggesting that you get to define who 'belongs' where?
Oh my god pointdexter…I’m pointing out that identity politics is dumb and falls apart.
Always making it the “first this or that. First one legged Eskimo, first polydactyl with one weird boob” it’s DUMB.
Just put sexy women (the ones who never had a dick) on the cover of your has been magazine and stop trying to pretend you serve some greater purpose.
I mock the term “indigenous” used as such like I do “Asian” when it’s referring to someone from the Orient. It’s woefully inadequate and honestly low key racist my making them some monolithic group.
It’s a hot chick, likely mixed several times over, who they are patting themselves on the back for.
It’s about attention, and I guess it’s working.
1
Posted on 5/15/22 at 3:37 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Oh my god pointdexter…I’m pointing out that identity politics is dumb and falls apart.
Again, what do you think the word indigenous means?
quote:
Just put sexy women (the ones who never had a dick) on the cover of your has been magazine and stop trying to pretend you serve some greater purpose.
Lol. You say the dumbest shite and are immune to correction. It’s impressive how stupid you are.
quote:
I mock the term “indigenous” used as such like I do “Asian” when it’s referring to someone from the Orient. It’s woefully inadequate and honestly low key racist my making them some monolithic group.
I’m begging you to just go read a real book and not a podcast and understand why people in this field use indigenous.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:15 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Again, what do you think the word indigenous means?
I don’t think I like your tone. I’m getting pretty indigenous with you right now.
quote:
It’s impressive how stupid you are.
quote:
I’m begging you to just go read a real book and not a podcast and understand why people in this field use indigenous.
The important academic field of the sports illustrated swimsuit issue?
Look, dude, I obviously know what the ACTUAL word means.
I’m mocking the way Sports illustrated is using it for woke points. If you stopped looking down your nose you’d see that, and you wouldn’t be so damn indigenous.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:20 pm to MDB
quote:
Not sure how to say side boob in Cree. Titicaca.
Ti’tanka?
I’d put my teepee in her wigwam.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:23 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Look, dude, I obviously know what the ACTUAL word means.
Nah, you really don’t. Read your original post again and then your follow-up. It makes no sense if you actually knew what the word meant.
quote:
I’m mocking the way Sports illustrated is using it for woke points
Like I said, everything boils down banal reactionary nonsense.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:27 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:It is a useless term that gives credence to a useless topic outside of historical contexts.
Again, what do you think the word indigenous means?
It doesn’t really matter one way or another.
quote:Which field?
I’m begging you to just go read a real book and not a podcast and understand why people in this field use indigenous.
The field of academic research or journalism?
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:27 pm to RealDawg
I don’t know what the significance of her being “indigenous” is to be honest, but at least she’s hot and doesn’t have a dick
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:29 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Think this out fully for me
Whether you believe in creation or evolution, life began in one area. Then because of overpopulation, natural disasters, or family feuds etc, man began to migrate to unsettled areas.
There indigenous claim only lasted only as long as the next migration out of some other negatively impacted region. Therefore, there was never been indigenous peoples, precisely because NO ONE can pinpoint the first area of human settlement
So you are left with what we have . . . . conquering of lands and its resources by larger populations, or better armed invaders
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:30 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Ashley Callingbull
She won’t let you get away with shite.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:34 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Think this out fully for me.
All humans came from Africa. A very long time ago, people came to the America’s and settled all over. From modern Canada to southern Chile, in places as many as 10k years before the next group.
This next group came and slaughtered them all, and they formed the ancestors of current tribes, who also continued the tradition of killing other tribes at times to gain their land.
Now hypocritical terms like “First Nation” are used to garner sympathy because what they did for thousands of years was done to them a couple couple hundred years ago.
Well, almost. Unlike previously, genocide wasn’t the explicit goal. But in the modern world, there is a “white people” multiplier used on acts that determine how “bad” they are.
This post was edited on 5/15/22 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:35 pm to RealDawg
She looks just like every women I see on the rez.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:35 pm to RealDawg
Good looking woman and built nice. Wood.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:37 pm to Scruffy
quote:
It is a useless term that gives credence to a useless topic outside of historical contexts.
Nah, it’s relevant in several fields, including molecular bio and genetics. It’s a useful term that people get upset about for no real reason.
quote:
The field of academic research
The only field that matters to me.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:44 pm to Volvagia
quote:
This next group came and slaughtered them all, and they formed the ancestors of current tribes, who also continued the tradition of killing other tribes at times to gain their land.
Again, this is not true. Or rather, an oversimplification of a very interesting migration dispersal process that was mediated by several geographic factors that makes it almost impossible to say.
quote:
Well, almost. Unlike previously, genocide wasn’t the explicit goal.
Again not true. It depends on what groups we are talking about, the political context, and several other factors. The best entry level book on this is Beyond Germs, but the work in the field is voluminous.
This post was edited on 5/15/22 at 4:45 pm
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:49 pm to crazy4lsu
The shite you nerds will argue about will be studied by academics 5,000 years from now in voluminous capacity.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:51 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
shite, I would love to be read 5000 years from now. That’s a very nice thing to say.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:53 pm to crazy4lsu
Unfortunately for you they’ll have to read my responses to you. And I’m just here to look at boobies.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 4:57 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Still counts. It will be like Nanni complaining about the quality of Ea-Nasir's copper.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 5:00 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Nah, it’s relevant in several fields, including molecular bio and genetics
And Sports Illustrated, apparently.
For them, it’s a euphemism for Injun.
Posted on 5/15/22 at 5:03 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Again, this is not true. Or rather, an oversimplification of a very interesting migration dispersal process that was mediated by several geographic factors that makes it almost impossible to say.
We can’t conclusively know what happened. But here are the facts
-All current tribes are traceable to Clovis linage.
-So much evidence for Clovis tribes it was believed they were the first ones, crossing over the land bridge
-This was shaken up in the past 20 years from this discovery of artifacts produced in a distinct style dated at minimum a 1000 years before the earliest possible entry from Clovis derived tribes. A culture that took so long to discover because all evidence of production with that style suddenly disappeared.
Connect the dots as to what happened.
This post was edited on 5/15/22 at 5:04 pm
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News