- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fed investigators looking into allegations of a cover up in Will Smith case
Posted on 4/23/16 at 12:42 pm to TitleistProV1X
Posted on 4/23/16 at 12:42 pm to TitleistProV1X
quote:
Why would Smith shoot his own wife and then turn his back to the guy he's fighting with and then the guy unloads his gun into his back? None of this shite makes any sense. You can poke holes everywhere no matter what side you're on.
Do we know the mechanics of where each was? Could he have accidentally discharged, turned to see what happened to her when she presumably screams and Hayes relatively quickly also started firing?
0
Posted on 4/23/16 at 12:44 pm to Placebeaux
quote:
Silly to interpret witness statements as allegations I guess.
The point is that the feds are not "looking into" anything, nor does the article say that.
Posted on 4/23/16 at 12:45 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Smith hits him from behind = free pass.
No, it's a crime. But after he left, Hayes was not in further danger. What he did after was all illegal and dangerous. Once he hit Smith, it's a seperate crime and things stemming from that or def because if the actions he took.
Posted on 4/23/16 at 12:52 pm to Negative Nomad
quote:
You better pull your head out of the sand. If there is any truth to any one part of this, there is enough doubt that a jury will let him walk. I would at this point.
Not IMO. The cover up by a witness would be AFTER the death.
Why isn't it logical Smith would arm himself if someone chased him and rammed his car and approached his car?
I don't get this being a big deal as far as a cop moving his gun. Doesn't make the criminal act before just go away.
So I guess my hypothetical to you is....let's say your in a bar and get in a scuffle and hit a guy....you leave the bar and flee. He CANNOT chase you down, ran your car, shoot you, and claim self defense because you feared for your harm and armed yourself with a legal weapon to defend yourself.
Look at the stuff that just happened with the UF guy. At the strip club is one thing....Once they left and he oursuedand was the aggressor, ALL the charges that followed were because of his aggression.
Posted on 4/23/16 at 12:56 pm to CAD703X
Not impossible if the gun was removed cleaned and the replaced.
Not saying that is what happened but it's possible with the gun not being found until after a warrant was obtained two days later.
Not saying that is what happened but it's possible with the gun not being found until after a warrant was obtained two days later.
Posted on 4/23/16 at 1:04 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
Exactly. If smith had his gun in hand, shot his wife, how the frick did he end up being shot 7 times in the back and halfway in his suv? It's crazy how quickly people on here change their tune based on some allegation that could be complete bs.
Smith gets out of his car, gun in hand. Accidentally shoots his wife, turns his back to Hayes to look at his wife, Hayes freaks out(rightfully so) and unloads a magazine into smith.
Posted on 4/23/16 at 1:04 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:
If Smith accidentally shot his wife first, they will probably have to drop the murder charge.
What if Smith was shot in the back while retrieving his gun, and the hit caused him to squeeze off a round into his wife?
Posted on 4/23/16 at 1:06 pm to 632627
He shot his wife while she was behind him? That makes no sense
Posted on 4/23/16 at 1:08 pm to Placebeaux
My friend just died in a gun fight, let me hurry and tamper with the evidence so it looks like he was a pure victim.
Posted on 4/23/16 at 1:09 pm to jeff5891
Isn't the presumed timeline that the wife was shot first. She was shot in both legs. So he accidentally shot his wife in each leg?
Posted on 4/23/16 at 1:14 pm to tLSU
quote:
The point is that the feds are not "looking into" anything, nor does the article say that.
From the article
quote:
Federal investigators are reportedly also interested in the allegations of a cover up.
Posted on 4/23/16 at 2:53 pm to Placebeaux
Well boo hoo if you can't read
Posted on 4/23/16 at 3:04 pm to Placebeaux
Based on what I've seen to date, Hayes had a .45 and Smith had a 9mm.
It is not rocket science determining the difference between the ballistics.
It is not rocket science determining the difference between the ballistics.
Posted on 4/28/16 at 11:48 am to 4LSU2
Chick Foret with WWL TV on twitter reporting that Orleans DA's office brought Hayes to grand jury proceeding to testify without notifying Hayes attorney or getting Hayes' attorney's permission. This would be pretty unethical if true
Posted on 4/28/16 at 11:51 am to ihometiger
"No DA can bring a defendant to their office without his lawyer". Judge refers to allegations of unethical behavior.
Judge refers to allegations of unethical behavior by Orleans DAs office
Judge refers to allegations of unethical behavior by Orleans DAs office
Posted on 4/28/16 at 11:53 am to rintintin
Why can't people just throw hands and let the best man win?
Posted on 4/28/16 at 11:54 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
So Hayes hit him from behind = everything that happaned after that was because of Hayes' actions.
Smith hits him from behind = free pass.
Come on, hitting from behind does not mean you shoot someone. We do not know who threatened to shoot or shot first.
Well one was intentionally done after chasing him. The other was an accident and they tried to flee.
Not saying who is guilty of what, but those are COMPLETELY different situations.
Posted on 4/28/16 at 11:57 am to Placebeaux
quote:
He was always best in a screen
Excellent. A+
Posted on 4/28/16 at 11:58 am to tLSU
quote:
Apparently a .45 holds 8 in the clip.
My .45 holds 13+1
Posted on 4/28/16 at 12:02 pm to ihometiger
quote:
Chick Foret with WWL TV on twitter reporting that Orleans DA's office brought Hayes to grand jury proceeding to testify without notifying Hayes attorney or getting Hayes' attorney's permission. This would be pretty unethical if true
Didn't Hayes's attorney want Hayes to testify before the grand jury? What's the issue if his lawyer wanted that?
Page 4 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News