- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does Anyone Have Any Unique Stories About Land Disputes?
Posted on 5/24/16 at 3:11 pm to Royal
Posted on 5/24/16 at 3:11 pm to Royal
quote:
Our law firm once foreclosed on a piece of property for a local bank. It was supposed to contain a newer ( maybe 5 years old) house, detached garage, and pool. So, the attorney handling the foreclosure simply used the description from the deed of trust-our firm had represented the bank in the closing as well. Bank foreclosed, family moved out, and the property was put up for sale. Buyers came in and were about to close when the whole process hit a snag. Turns out the bank had actually foreclosed on an empty lot next door! The builder had built the house, pool and garage on the WRONG LOT next door to the one on which the house was supposed to be built.
The Title Company is going to get sued.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 3:13 pm to TheBuescherMan
quote:
Read up on the land grants in Taos, New Mexico. I have some family out there, and have heard some off-hand accounts of what's going on. 10-cent recap: in the 1700's, the King of Spain gave land grants in current-day north New Mexico to prominent Spanish soldiers and elites. These land grants were supposed to last forever. Over the years, some of the soldiers/elite's ancestors have sold the land. Current-day ancestors who can trace their lineage back to the original grantees are claiming that the land still belongs to them, as the earlier ancestors had no legal basis to sell the land in the first place (King's decree lasting in perpetuity). In some cases, these grants have been subdivided into hundreds of individual properties - they want all of them. I do not believe they have been successful in any of their claims
This is some fascinating stuff. I can't imagine the Spanish aristocrats having any footing since the land was sold under the jurisdiction of another nation that didn't recognize the legitimacy of the permanent grants. Possession is 9/10th and all that...
Posted on 5/24/16 at 3:20 pm to OweO
quote:
So did the previous owners get to move back in?
No. I think the builder actually ended up owning (or purchasing) both the lots to make everything right. Im sure thats an oversimplification, but it was before my time at the firm.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News