Started By
Message

re: Cop stands up to gun nut in Texas.

Posted on 2/28/15 at 9:14 pm to
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22159 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

I'm not reading this entire thread (not yet, at least), but for those saying "the police officer has to check out whether someone openly carrying a rifle -- legal in Texas -- is a felon." Do police officers have the right to pull over every car they encounter to check to see whether the driver is licensed? Absolutely not. See Brown v. Texas for a clue. My argument is separate from drivers license checkpoints, which are random and less far-reaching.


I don't think people are advocating that cops stop every person open carrying a firearm. I would suggest cops use common sense. In this case, you see a man walking in downtown Houston with an AR-15. There are two likely scenarios here, 1. He's a wacko and is about to shoot up some place, or 2. He is seeking attention from the cops so he can make his little video. Either way, I have no problem with the cops questioning him.

If cops start stopping people with pistols on their hips, or people walking with rifles in rural areas, then I can buy this argument.
Posted by lsufan112001
sportsmans paradise
Member since Oct 2006
10716 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 9:22 pm to
If someone is walking around in your subdivision with an AR, would u want a cop to stop and ask? Why certainly

The guy should have gotten a ticket for having no ID.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

If cops start stopping people with pistols on their hips, or people walking with rifles in rural areas, then I can buy this argument.


Indeed, they have.

Video link

LINK

quote:

The guy should have gotten a ticket for having no ID.


There is no Texas law stating that people must carry identification when in public, other than driving or in a state park (I think that's right about the park).

In fact, you are not required to verbally identify yourself in Texas to a police officer "just for the hell of it."

quote:

Sec. 38.02. FAILURE TO IDENTIFY. (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information.

(b) A person commits an offense if he intentionally gives a false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has:

(1) lawfully arrested the person;

(2) lawfully detained the person; or

(3) requested the information from a person that the peace officer has good cause to believe is a witness to a criminal offense.
Posted by Mung
NorCal
Member since Aug 2007
9054 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 9:37 pm to
Attention whores. Like the Kardashians. Probably sprinted home to upload the video of their brilliant achievement, then had a big circle jerk with all their others 2A "Patriot" buddies. "OMG dude, you totally told that cop off!"
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51350 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 9:37 pm to
Open Carry Texas is a disgrace.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

Attention whores. Like the Kardashians. Probably sprinted home to upload the video of their brilliant achievement, then had a big circle jerk with all their others 2A "Patriot" buddies. "OMG dude, you totally told that cop off!"


Tell us... what state law did this man break?
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

If someone is walking around in your subdivision with an AR, would u want a cop to stop and ask? Why certainly



I see people with guns in my neighborhood all the time. I am surrounded by gun enthusiasts and cops who go shooting in the woods behind our home. Technically that's illegal so like I said that isn't a good comparison. Also the government and private citizens should not be held to the same standards in terms to how they react to abnormal or intimidating behavior.

quote:

The guy should have gotten a ticket for having no ID.


So now you think walking on a sidewalk without an ID should be illegal. You're a fine American.



My point is that if carrying a gun is legal then doing so shouldn't be just cause to detain someone. It should have to be accompanied by erratic or belligerent behavior.
Posted by Negative Nomad
Hell
Member since Oct 2011
3173 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 10:43 pm to

This post was edited on 4/9/15 at 4:40 pm
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92876 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 10:48 pm to
Nobody said he broke any laws. I still have no problem with the cop talking to a guy that is obviously weird and walking around with an AR-15 while wearing a dress.
Posted by lsufan112001
sportsmans paradise
Member since Oct 2006
10716 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 10:50 pm to
I got an AR. If I randomly walk around with it I have no problem with any questions being asked.

It's not a normal thing to do. The guy was wanting the attention and deservedly got it
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22159 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

Indeed, they have.



Well, I don't see any need to ID or question people carrying pistols unless it doesn't look right. My point is, I'm fine erring on the side of caution when it comes to questioning people walking around open carrying firearms. As long as it is a simply questioning and quick ID, I'm fine with it. It's when it gets to be long drawn out questioning, or questioning people in situations where open carry is openly accepted.
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 10:56 pm to
I have two issues.

1. The open carrier was a douche. Us cops deal with enough of them, no doubt.

2. I don't agree with IDing someone for just "open carrying".

Why?

Jones v. Clark
No. 09-3574 (7th Cir. 2011)
"...An officer is not entitled to qualified immunity when they detain an individual and can't point to a single circumstance that could have led them to believe an individual was engaged in criminal activity, nor that any federal or state law can justify the stop or support the view that the individual was committing a crime...."
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 2/28/15 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

I'm fine erring on the side of caution when it comes to questioning people walking around open carrying firearms


I'm still curious about this distinction of open carry vs. concealed in terms of one being seen as a threat and the other not. Is it because you just don't see pistols as threatening behavior but you see carrying rifles as threatening behavior and cause for suspicion?

Do you think people with open-carry pistols should be questioned?
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 12:42 am to
I have no problem with police initiating a consensual encounter to check a legal gun carrier's state of mind.

I do have a problem with the takedown and arrest that would likely ensue to said legal gun carrier if he or she simply didn't respond to police overtures for a consensual encounter, and walked away...
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78050 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 1:31 am to
quote:

Well, I don't see any need to ID or question people carrying pistols unless it doesn't look right.


In this day and age, no one open carrying a pistol in public "looks right"
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78050 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 1:33 am to
quote:

2. I don't agree with IDing someone for just "open carrying".


I agree, but when people start calling 911 to report the individual then police have to respond.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76546 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 3:54 am to
quote:

I have two issues.

1. The open carrier was a douche. Us cops deal with enough of them, no doubt.

2. I don't agree with IDing someone for just "open carrying".

Why?

Jones v. Clark
No. 09-3574 (7th Cir. 2011)
"...An officer is not entitled to qualified immunity when they detain an individual and can't point to a single circumstance that could have led them to believe an individual was engaged in criminal activity, nor that any federal or state law can justify the stop or support the view that the individual was committing a crime....


What's the best way to handle this situation in your opinion? I think the officer stepped over the line when he legally detained him.
Posted by BobABooey
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2004
14308 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 6:49 am to
quote:

In this day and age, no one open carrying a pistol in public "looks right"


What do you have against law enforcement officers?

Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11240 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 7:24 am to
quote:

Nobody said he broke any laws. I still have no problem with the cop talking to a guy that is obviously weird and walking around with an AR-15 while wearing a dress.



Nut job is walking around with an AR 15 and wearing a skirt scaring the F out of people. He's also sweating his arse off and quoting the Magna Carta or some such.

Loser is begging for attention and spoiling for a confrontation with "Big Brother". His arse needs to be locked up and medicated before he finally pops his cork.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64336 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 7:43 am to
quote:


I get the constitutional deal BUT come the hell on. LEOs have to respond to shite like this because if they DON'T and someone shoots a place up then the department gets fricked. The cop didn't come looking for a fight. He was doing his job be responding to a call. This cop handles it perfectly. If you're raising awareness for an issue then that's cool, just say what you're up to. 


fricking this.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram