Started By
Message

re: Cop Shoots Wife in Addis (updated)

Posted on 2/6/16 at 9:23 am to
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27349 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Please tell me you don't seriously believe this.




First step, drop mag.

Second step, clear round.

Third step, set mag and bullets in an area out of reach.

Fourth step, clear again.

Fifth step, point at a backdrop capable of stopping yhe round.

Sixth step, pull trigger.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 9:31 am to
quote:

First step, drop mag.

Second step, clear round.

Third step, set mag and bullets in an area out of reach.

Fourth step, clear again.

Fifth step, point at a backdrop capable of stopping yhe round.

Sixth step, pull trigger.


Believe it or not people forget step 2 more than people would think.

Or they clear the round and then drop the mag.

Typically because they aren't paying attention because they are talking or have some other distraction.
This post was edited on 2/6/16 at 9:32 am
Posted by PepaSpray
Adamantium Membership
Member since Aug 2012
11080 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 9:35 am to
quote:

So, a law officer that has hours upon hours of firearms training, accidentally discharges a firearm in the direction of his wife that happens to strike her in a lethal fashion while he was "cleaning" it is dismissed my another law agency is not suspicious?

How many guns have you cleaned loaded, or even intact? The first thing most people do is disassemble it.


interesting, indeed.

We're gonna need a bigger boat.
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5702 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 9:45 am to
Well if you want to be technical, you have to buy the glock before you can clean it so perhaps I should have included that step too. The point I was making was that you pull the trigger as part of the cleaning process. By failing to confirm the gun was unloaded (first safety failure), that step would cause an accidental discharge. If the gun is pointed at someone when they happens (second safety failure), it would then cause injury.

The point I was making is that everyone assumes that the cop wanted to kill his wife and is blaming an accident. Accidents happen, and if someone gets hurt as a result, that sucks for everyone. But assuming malicious intent without additional information is reaching. By that logic, no person has ever been killed accidentally, every time someone dies from a gun shot, it's because the person who pulled the trigger wanted to kill someone? Or are cops only held to that logic?
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Accidents happen, and if someone gets hurt as a result, that sucks for everyone.




He's supposed to be a professional.

quote:

But assuming malicious intent without additional information is reaching. By that logic, no person has ever been killed accidentally, every time someone dies from a gun shot, it's because the person who pulled the trigger wanted to kill someone? Or are cops only held to that logic?


See above. A lot of mistakes had to be made by a man who is supposed to know how to use that weapon in order for the "accident" to happen. Then the bullet just has to have the terrible odds of striking the person in the room. By your same horrible logic, you have to make a lot of logical assumptions to assume that it was an accident.

Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5702 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:05 am to
So being a "professional" renders one incapable of accidents? No truck driver has ever killed someone by accident, they specifically intended to kill the victims of accidents they cause? No doctor has ever accidentally killed someone in surgery, they intended to kill their patient? Mistakes can happen to anyone regardless of the amount of experience they may have.

It's pretty horrible logic to assume that simply having received firearms training makes a cop incapable of accidents. No one is perfect and stories like this motivate gun owners to be more diligent in their handling of firearms so that they hopefully never make the same mistake.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:07 am to
quote:

So being a "professional" renders one incapable of accidents?


Is that what I said?

quote:

It's pretty horrible logic to assume that simply having received firearms training makes a cop incapable of accidents. No one is perfect and stories like this motivate gun owners to be more diligent in their handling of firearms so that they hopefully never make the same mistake.


Yea, you can't read
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27349 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:09 am to
And you think cops have extensive firearm training?

I'll yake illiteracy over idiocy.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:15 am to
Did I say extensive?

I'm assuming he has some experience and training. I'm at least assuming he has access to the internet or his gun came with instructions on properly cleaning it.

Certainly more training than the average gun holder

quote:

I'll yake illiteracy over idiocy.


says the cop

Crazy thing about being a professional: if your organization doesn't provide the training, provide it for yourself.
This post was edited on 2/6/16 at 10:18 am
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5702 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:20 am to
Perhaps I misunderstood your point.

quote:

A lot of mistakes had to be made by a man who is supposed to know how to use that weapon in order for the "accident" to happen. Then the bullet just has to have the terrible odds of striking the person in the room.


That's right, all terrible mistakes. I thought you were being sarcastic and suggesting these weren't mistakes at all, but a calculated murder blamed on mistakes. And your support for such a position was the assumption that a "professional" is incapable of mistakes and thus this had to be intentional. My point was that mistakes can happen to anyone, no matter the amount of training they have had.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:21 am to
quote:

I'm assuming he has some experience and training.


In Louisiana, you can work for 1 year before being required to be POST certified.

So it is possible he had zero training or experience.
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
12143 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:23 am to
I have a relative who was active military and was cleaning his personal gun at home. While cleaning it he accidentally shot and killed his best friend.

Obviously he did several things wrong in the cleaning but it was 100% an accident.

Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5702 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:25 am to
quote:

I'm at least assuming he has access to the internet or his gun came with instructions on properly cleaning it.


Does every driver consult their vehicle manual every time they drive? Do we blame vehicle collisions on a failure to review the instructions and traffic laws each time before driving? Surely you aren't this obtuse. My assumption is you have very little experience with firearms to not realize how easily mistakes can happen.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:26 am to
quote:

the terrible odds of striking the person in the room.


How do you know she was in the room? The bullet could have passed through a wall or walls.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66891 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:27 am to
That's like OJ's knife accidentally slashing Nicole Brown Simpson's throat. OJ was just trying to wipe off the blade. Oops
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:40 am to
quote:

How do you know she was in the room? The bullet could have passed through a wall or walls.


I don't, but your scenario makes it even more improbable.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:42 am to
quote:

That's right, all terrible mistakes. I thought you were being sarcastic and suggesting these weren't mistakes at all, but a calculated murder blamed on mistakes. And your support for such a position was the assumption that a "professional" is incapable of mistakes and thus this had to be intentional. My point was that mistakes can happen to anyone, no matter the amount of training they have had.


Right, but here we have mistake after mistake in this scenario including an unlikely ending, probability wise, of a lethal shot.

That's why it is being investigated.
This post was edited on 2/6/16 at 10:43 am
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Does every driver consult their vehicle manual every time they drive?


pretty sure we require driving training/test before initially driving

And drivers get charged all the time in accidents

quote:

 Do we blame vehicle collisions on a failure to review the instructions and traffic laws each time before driving? 


Yes, we literally blame the at fault car and driver...

A better comparison would be driving drunk and cleaning a loaded gun. Yea, the driver's intent wasn't to kill the person....
This post was edited on 2/6/16 at 10:48 am
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92876 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:50 am to
Dude is lucky he is a cop
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 2/6/16 at 10:52 am to
quote:

That's why it is being investigated.



Exactly.

and it is silly to assume that foul play is at hand due to a very short news article.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram