Started By
Message

re: Carbs and weight - then vs now

Posted on 10/17/16 at 8:04 pm to
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11089 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

No they didn't you dolt


By

quote:

Cracker




Sincerely disagree,

Crackling
Posted by RebelExpress38
In your base, killin your dudes
Member since Apr 2012
13551 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

Portion sizes exploded



This x1000.

Go look at a fast food joint picture from the 50s and look at the size of their plates. Then go look at the food we eat today.
Posted by Honky Lips
Member since Dec 2015
2828 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

No they didn't you dolt


I don't think too many people were going Atkins or Paleo in the 50's

This post was edited on 10/17/16 at 8:56 pm
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

quote:


I don't think too many people where going Atkins or Paleo in the 50's




People were eating Paleo way before the 50's
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

Portion sizes exploded


This x 1000

Who here is old enough to remember when a coke was 8oz, and the big bottle was 12oz. A big mac was the giant burger. etc

We are simply consuming way too many calories.
Posted by RDOtiger
Zachary
Member since Oct 2013
1146 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

They didn't even have roids. At the most, milk was your go to supplement for packing on mass and making #Gainz.


That may have limited muscle size, but I'm sure kids playing with toys made from radioactive materials, everyone handling mercury, lead paint being the standard, and asbestos in practically everything, didn't help with weight gain or retention either...
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7119 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Portion sizes exploded

I'm always asking my wife when we go out to eat why don't they make the portions smaller and drop the cost a few bucks. Most places put too much food on the plate. I don't know how people eat appetizers, entree, and a dessert. I only ever get an entree and most places is more than I can eat comfortably, and I'm a 6' 200lb man. This is the cause for obesity, people are eating too much food.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:05 pm to
our food wasn't so full of sugar in the 1950's
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

Most places put too much food on the plate. I don't know how people eat appetizers, entree, and a dessert. I only ever get an entree and most places is more than I can eat comfortably, and I'm a 6' 200lb man. This is the cause for obesity, people are eating too much food.
All of this.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42565 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:10 pm to
Welcome to Keto, brother.
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
48838 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

This x 1000 Who here is old enough to remember when a coke was 8oz, and the big bottle was 12oz. A big mac was the giant burger. etc We are simply consuming way too many calories.


Actually that original Coke bottle was 6.5 ounces.

The glass ones now are 8 ounces.

And yes I'm old enough to remember my mother handing the car keys to one of the Wade Lemoine Esso attendants and he opened the trunk and would exchange the wooden case of empty Coke bottles with a fresh one. Those few Cokes were about the extent of our sugar.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62985 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:12 pm to
Can I get a link to average weight for American adults in the 50s and today?
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7119 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Can I get a link to average weight for American adults in the 50s and today?
Here you go

quote:

The average weight for men rose "dramatically," in the CDC's words, from 166.3 pounds in 1960 to 191 pounds in 2002. Women went from 140.2 pounds in 1960 to 164.3 pounds in 2002.
This post was edited on 10/17/16 at 9:21 pm
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62985 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:20 pm to
Thanks. I assume the definition of obesity is applied evenly? They don't state it in that article from what I saw.

I know what is called fat these days was called healthy, and even sexy back then.

Not making an argument at the moment, just looking for cited facts.

I think much of what has been posted in the thread makes sense.
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7119 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:21 pm to
I changed the link to something more exact, dealing with weight instead of BMI
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62985 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:24 pm to
That's a big jump. Aside from accounting for an increase in height and perhaps weight lifting or other healthier reasons for a higher average, the article also talks about ethnicity, which has gotten more diverse since then.
Posted by Balloon Huffer
Member since Sep 2010
3421 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:32 pm to
The TRUE difference is processed food ---- and SUGAR. Sugar is basically the worst. Well, fake sugar is actually the worsty worst.

In the 50's, stay at home moms cooked. What did they cook, a box of macaroni or rice a roni? No, they cooked real food. No boxes, no processed. No dehydrated. No bleached flour, no "enriched" anything (enriched sounds like a good thing right?)

These processed foods are super saturated with calories.

It is not carbs. Any actual nutritionist or dietitian will tell you to EAT CARBS. Eat a balanced diet. They will actually tell you to eat FAT. Yes, you need a balance -- carbs, protein and fat. (healthy fats) Typically 40/40/20 or 30/40/30.

Meat is another problem. We eat way too much meat. I'm certain that all of you brainwashed individuals immediately thought of protein deficiency when I said that. However, that is just the "Pavlov's dog" coming out of you. Vegetables have protein in them. Adding beans, legumes, nuts, etc. will give you more than enough protein as well.

Question this, why does the food pyramid change every 10 - 20 years. Have there been scientific breakthroughs? Or, is it simply that the FDA is sadly open to the highest bidder. And who exactly do you think the highest bidders are?? Hmm, diary - check, meat - double check. Do those have anything to do with COWS???

What other animal in the world drinks the mother's milk --- of another animal?


TL:DR - Cut back on your meat intake, do NOT cook anything out of a box. You must actually cut and cook your food. This is truly the secret. Eat WHATEVER you want -- but you must cook it. And it must be whole foods.

I spent most of my late 20's and early 30s in the 230 range (6'1" - big skeleton - was overweight but hid well enough) switched to a healthy food lifestyle, didn't start working out, and for the last 5 years I've been between 200 -210 -- and ......not to brag, but I'm pretty fricking sexy. All because I stopped eating fast food and quick fix boxes....

An entire head of cauliflower is only 100 calories. This will fill you up completely. For equivalence this is less than 1 bite of some deserts. 1 small spoon versus stuffing yourself to the gills with a literal superfood.
This post was edited on 10/17/16 at 9:35 pm
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7119 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:32 pm to
Intersting article about Marilyn Monroe's figure

quote:

So what size was Marilyn Monroe actually? Luckily, many of her dresses, carefully preserved, are still around to measure off of. Further, one of her dress makers also chimed in with exact measurements he took. Those measurements were 5 ft. 5.5 inches tall; 35 inch bust; 22 inch waist (approximately 2-3 inches less than the average American woman in the 1950s and 12 inches less than average today); and 35 inch hips, with a bra size of 36D.


So women on average are about 10 inches bigger in the waistline today than in the 50s
This post was edited on 10/17/16 at 9:38 pm
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43299 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

Well, fake sugar is actually the worsty worst.


While there's no research suggesting 'fake sugar' is any good for you, you'd be very hard pressed to find any scientific literature that conclusively shows 'fake sugar' as inherently bad. Most of the studies are flawed in one way or another, and there are many types of 'fake sugar' and they all need to be studied and evaluated independently. It is certainly a murky enough topic to at least be unable to label fake sugars as worse than actual sugar, which scientific research shows is bad for you when taken in excessively.
This post was edited on 10/17/16 at 9:43 pm
Posted by Balloon Huffer
Member since Sep 2010
3421 posts
Posted on 10/17/16 at 10:19 pm to
America is fat and sick.


All the clues are there. What has changed? Read my post up above.

People do stupid shite like count calories or eat no carbs -- all while putting chemical laden substances in their body.

PS - BLEACHED (enriched) flour --- is not good for you. Why do they BLEACH IT? because flour is naturally yellow, and yellow looks dingy....sad but true.

Whats really sad -- if you just let the flour sit in a window for 2 days it will turn white on its own......but companies cannot wait for this (lost profits) so what do they do --- they actually put BLEACH on your food......and the FDA allows it.

The increase in cancer is DIRECTLY proportional to the increase in the "western diet"

Keep on those fads though, they really work!
This post was edited on 10/18/16 at 8:11 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram