Started By
Message

re: Best video breakdown of the Cincinnati Tensing/Dubose shooting I have seen yet

Posted on 7/31/15 at 8:50 am to
Posted by DaTroof
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2015
976 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 8:50 am to
quote:

quote:
TigerHam85


Stop feeding this troll. He does this in every thread.


He's also a fricking moron.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 8:51 am to
I'm still amused at the OP vignette.

LOL. It's counting the "drag" distance AFTER he shot the dude as justification for the shoot.

Let the frick go of the car dumb arse!!!
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 8:53 am to
quote:

A wise choice. Alas, if I had hung on, the car would not have been "dragging" me, I would have been "holding on".


it would've been dragging you while you were holding on
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 8:53 am to
quote:

What would your opinion be if this guy caused an accident and killed someone in your family (while under the influence)?

What would your opinion if, while flailing like an a-hole, the cop's shot missed the dude and went thru his side window and killed a 4 year old?

The most dangerous person to bystanders at that moment was the cop because if we are to believe his defenders, he was being drug and feared being out of control so much that he thought he might go under the car, BUT, he still threw his hand up there and squeezed one off.

Of course, what really happened is fricking obvious. He started to get pulled WHILE HE HELD ON, gained enough control to take the shot............did.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 8:55 am to
quote:

it would've been dragging you while you were holding on

Nope. Dragging implies a lack of control.

You tie a rope to your trailer hitch and to me then start driving.........you're "dragging me".

I grab your trailer hitch, you start driving and I hold on.........you aren't dragging shite.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41899 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 8:56 am to
Does he have to shoot if the guy doesn't flee?

Right or wrong, you're playing with fire when you do stupid shite.
Posted by TigerHam85
59-024 Kamehameha Highway
Member since Nov 2009
31493 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 8:58 am to
You so mad dawg
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Nope. Dragging implies a lack of control.


kinda. it implies force and lack of control. just because you're holding on doesn't mean you're in control
This post was edited on 7/31/15 at 9:02 am
Posted by Tigerstudent08
Lakeview
Member since Apr 2007
5776 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 9:02 am to
Again let's look at the Physics, the guy is getting pulled over on the right side of the road, hence his steering wheel has been turned slightly to the right. The officer is on the left hand side of the car at the driver side window. He starts the car and then within TWO SECONDS he shoots him in the head. One cannot turn the steering wheel as far to the left as it can go (this is what would be required for the man to just roll over his toes) while it is sitting still in that short amount of time. Did you see the driver frantically turning the steering wheel left as he was starting the car? No.
Posted by DaTroof
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2015
976 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 9:05 am to
quote:

you're playing with fire when you do stupid shite


So you've never done something stupid? We all do stupid shite. Everybody makes mistakes. There isn't a perfect person in this world. Shooting somebody for trying to run is murder. I hope the cop rots in jail and I hope this deters all other cops from turning 'minor traffic stops' into the worst mistake of their life.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28164 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 9:10 am to
I was looking at where the car ended up and the fact that, for whatever reason, the cop, at some point, ended up on the ground.

I agree that he was stopped on the right side of the road, but as you saw, the car ended up down the block, on the left side of the road.

You and I both know that a true accident reconstruction (not some numbnuts with a measuring wheel) would be necessary to determine speed, angle, and force.

I believe that intelligent people can have a reasonable conversation, yet have differing opinions, even on a message board.

Of course, I also believe in Santa Claus, so there's that.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28164 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 9:17 am to
SR, I agree, the vid clearly shows his gun was straight and level when he fired.

I don't see any way he was ever drug by the car, unless, and this is a big unless, the driver turned left, hit the/brushed the cop, knocked him down and his (the cop) immediate reaction was that he felt in fear for his life.

"Hey this guy was being uncooperative and evasive. Then, he tries to drive off, hitting me in the process. I've gotta stop this guy."

Just an opinion...
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40798 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 9:27 am to
The breakdown still does not change the fact that the cop never should have pulled his gun and fired. So what if he got caught up in the car as it was pulling away. The worse that could have happened to him was a broken leg or two had he been run over.
Posted by Tigerstudent08
Lakeview
Member since Apr 2007
5776 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 9:29 am to
Which was a fair distance down the road. He went maybe 10-15 degrees to the left from where his car was originally. For him to strike the officer he. Would need to turn at more than 45 degrees to hit him.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28164 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 9:32 am to
Good point.


And we're both assuming a straight shot, with no turns.

Depending on the year of the car (I think it's too old) it may have a data recorder. Assuming the car hasn't been driven, it may have some information.
Posted by Tigerstudent08
Lakeview
Member since Apr 2007
5776 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 9:42 am to
Typically I see cops have their guns secured in their holster with a buttoned down strap. It is amazing to me that in two seconds fear of he was going to be killed popped into his head, he reaches for his weapon, removes it from the holster and aims it at the guys head and then pulls the trigger. That is an incredible amount of things to happen in TWO mississippis!
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28164 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 9:49 am to
With training, that's pretty easily done.

I'm sure he was in Condition One or Zero, only difference being safety on or off. Plus, it was a close shot so target acquisition would be instantaneous.
Posted by Tigerstudent08
Lakeview
Member since Apr 2007
5776 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 10:07 am to
If he can react that quickly why not just take one step back away from the car and completely remove himself from harms way? Seems more feasible to me in two seconds.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 12:10 pm to
I can't believe people are arguing about the driving skills of a corpse. And, as usual, Choctaw is wrong about everything. It's quite amazing, his consistency.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 7/31/15 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

LOL. It's counting the "drag" distance AFTER he shot the dude as justification for the shoot.
It's like shooting somebody and justifying it due to assault because the person fell into the shooter AFTER being shot.
This post was edited on 7/31/15 at 12:41 pm
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram