Started By
Message

re: Alcohol and Responsibility

Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:41 pm to
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
90158 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:41 pm to
There is nothing hotter than a super drunk gf/wife ready for sex.
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
14042 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

And what if the aggressor is also intoxicated, with no recollection?

If two drunks frick, that's not a crime.
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
5936 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:42 pm to
Driving in texas with an open 16 ounce can of beer is not an issue. A 6 pax could be a problem
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
41881 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:43 pm to
Who doesn’t have recollection? The aggressor or the victim?
I think the law can be interpreted as: Intoxication means a man or woman cannot consent, but it does not remove his or her capacity to commit rape.

But I am not a lawyer.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142182 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

There is nothing hotter than a super drunk gf/wife ready for sex.
especially when she's driving
Posted by liz18lsu
Naples, FL
Member since Feb 2009
17303 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

If two drunks frick, that's not a crime.


I am sure there are men who have gone to trial who would disagree.
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
1294 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:45 pm to
sorry you cheated
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15561 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

a person is raped, while voluntarily intoxicated, it doesn't count? You are stating the defense. My point, what about the offense? Two very different views, depending on the offense v. defense.

You’re thinking about it wrong

The rape victim has no culpability. The statute for third degree rape states that:
quote:



Third degree rape is a rape committed when the anal, oral, or vaginal sexual intercourse is deemed to be without the lawful consent of a victim because it is committed under any one or more of the following circumstances:

1)When the victim is incapable of resisting or of understanding the nature of the act by reason of a stupor or abnormal condition of mind produced by an intoxicating agent or any cause and the offender knew or should have known of the victim's incapacity.

This necessarily means that there can be only one victim.
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
14042 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

I am sure there are men who have gone to trial who would disagree.


Most likely. Although I'd be willing to bet that more men have been to trial over nothing more than being on the wrong side of an evil woman during a break-up/divorce.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
37204 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

If you drive drunk, all on you.
I always found it cool when a cop shoots a drunk driver that pulled on the side of the road to not drive drunk anymore. Only one gets killed.
Posted by faraway
Member since Nov 2022
2063 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

I am sure there are men who have gone to trial who would disagree.
I have no doubt you are correct but if both are drunk, how do you know who raped who?
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
41881 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

I have no doubt you are correct but if both are drunk, how do you know who raped who?
the one who makes the complaint first is the victim
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15561 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

have no doubt you are correct but if both are drunk, how do you know who raped who?

It’s a factual question. What evidence is there to show that one knew the other couldn’t consent?
Posted by Who_Dat_Tiger
Member since Nov 2015
17514 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

quote:

Does the distinction come from intent?

Misspelled “implication”.


Posted by Btrtigerfan
Disgruntled employee
Member since Dec 2007
21502 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

If two drunks frick, that's not a crime.


If it's two adults, there should be an equal amount of culpability. You should know better than to drive or operate heavy machinery if you are impaired. To suggest otherwise, would be to affirm that females are weaker and likely victims.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65802 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:57 pm to

If you start a new alcohol OP and it's nowhere near July/August yet, you're a mess on probation. Prove me wrong.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25723 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Does the distinction come from intent?


The word lawyers get paid a lot of money to whip out would be mens rea.
Posted by The Cool No 9
70816
Member since Jan 2014
9961 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 10:08 pm to
quote:


It’s not drinking and driving if you live in your car.

Posted by Lake08
Member since Jun 2023
563 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 10:14 pm to
I love all these idiot do gooders that think just because you’ve had 2/3 drinks in a couple hours you deserve to die……
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
37204 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 10:18 pm to
TD needs a sarcasm font.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram