- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What could Strief fetch us in a trade?
Posted on 9/27/17 at 4:36 am
Posted on 9/27/17 at 4:36 am
Yes hes 34, but he still has 2 years left on his deal and has been elite at RT for a couple years now. Could we maybe tag a future 6th-7th rounder and ship him to a team like Sea, Oak, or NYG for something? I think Ramcyzk can get the job done and wouldn't be opposed to ship him for something that could either help us now or get us a decent pick for next years draft.
10
Posted on 9/27/17 at 4:41 am to TPecoraro23
I'd rather keep Strief for the next 2 years and have offensive line depth than have a 6th or 7th rounder
Posted on 9/27/17 at 5:35 am to TPecoraro23
at best 3-4 rounder
At worst 6-7 rounder
Think he's in the Ingram category of being more valuable to the team than the compensation we will get back.
At worst 6-7 rounder
Think he's in the Ingram category of being more valuable to the team than the compensation we will get back.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:08 am to TPecoraro23
Elite?
Elite?
You’re a fan and I get that, but you can’t really think he’s been elite.
Elite?
You’re a fan and I get that, but you can’t really think he’s been elite.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:15 am to mindbreaker
quote:
at best 3-4 rounder
Insane. If you found a team desperate enough you might be able to get a conditional 6th or 7th but I doubt he has any trade value at his age.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:25 am to TPecoraro23
quote:
Yes hes 34, but he still has 2 years left on his deal and has been elite at RT for a couple years now. Could we maybe tag a future 6th-7th rounder and ship him to a team like Sea, Oak, or NYG for something? I think Ramcyzk can get the job done and wouldn't be opposed to ship him for something that could either help us now or get us a decent pick for next years draft.
Here is his trade value:
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:43 am to TPecoraro23
Are we suddenly deep at tackle and I missed it?
Posted on 9/27/17 at 7:41 am to TPecoraro23
From people I know that know him well, he's on the verge of retirement. Probably why we drafted Ram.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 7:45 am to CoeJ
Last year I bet.
And Zach has been a great Saint. Great rep for the team and the area.
And Zach has been a great Saint. Great rep for the team and the area.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 8:29 am to GeauxBayouBengals
quote:
Insane. If you found a team desperate enough you might be able to get a conditional 6th or 7th but I doubt he has any trade value at his age.
Maybe but I didn't think we would get anything higher than a 7th for Stephon Anthony. If a team is desperate and thinks that they are one legit right tackle away from winning it this year or next. They would be willing to give up that.
This post was edited on 9/27/17 at 8:30 am
Posted on 9/27/17 at 8:33 am to mindbreaker
quote:
at best 3-4 rounder
No team (not even an incompetent Cle or formally Oak) would give up more than a 5th and that is really pushing it.
We're better off keeping and using him ourselves. Not like our line has been a model of health to start trading away the good ones.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 8:36 am to mindbreaker
quote:
higher than a 7th for Stephon Anthony
Age is a HUGE factor in this type of thing. Anthony's age and being a first rounder is why we got what we did. He has shown as recently as last year he can be productive and has plenty of good years left if he pans out.
Strief is on a short ticking clock. No one is giving up higher than a 5th for a guy that might be done after this year or the next.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 8:40 am to bonethug0108
quote:
Strief is on a short ticking clock. No one is giving up higher than a 5th for a guy that might be done after this year or the next.
I mean I said at best. Meaning that in a perfect all the cards fall right for this to happen scenario. That doesn't mean it's probable. Still don't think it's impossible either.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 8:45 am to drake20
quote:
I'd rather keep Strief for the next 2 years and have offensive line depth than have a 6th or 7th rounder
This is probably the right call.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 9:07 am to mindbreaker
I know, but I do think it's impossible. I don't see any situation any team gives up higher than a 5th. There's this certain barrier teams perceive between a 4th and a 5th and you can look at all the trades involving players and picks and those rounds and see the difference in what a 4th is valued as vs. a 5th.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 9:11 am to bonethug0108
yeah, to keep him for 2018, you are paying him 5.1 million. only 1.1 guaranteed. He's gone after this year. If you get a 5th for him from a team that's OL Needy and playoff contender. That's logical but i still say no way saints are trading him.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 9:15 am to Chad504boy
Strief seems like the type that would take a pay cut next year to stay, if he doesn't retire.
But we need him this year and I don't see us trading him and also don't see any team about to give up a pick for him at this point.
What team is needy enough right now and in contention to trade something for a 34 year old RT recovering from a sprained knee?
But we need him this year and I don't see us trading him and also don't see any team about to give up a pick for him at this point.
What team is needy enough right now and in contention to trade something for a 34 year old RT recovering from a sprained knee?
Posted on 9/27/17 at 9:25 am to mindbreaker
quote:
at best 3-4 rounder
LOL no.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 9:38 am to TPecoraro23
About the same thing as asking what we can get in trade for Morstead.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 10:20 am to bonethug0108
quote:
I know, but I do think it's impossible. I don't see any situation any team gives up higher than a 5th. There's this certain barrier teams perceive between a 4th and a 5th and you can look at all the trades involving players and picks and those rounds and see the difference in what a 4th is valued as vs. a 5th.
Fair enough.
I looked up the Willie Roaf trade to compare. Considering these factors Roaf was 32 (two years younger) and at a more premium spot and a perennial probowler. and the trade value was a 4th which turned into 3rd based on playing time. So yeah 3-4 might be a little high.
and before it's thrown back at me I realize Roaf is a hall of famer and Strief isn't that. But I also Know Strief has been graded as a top 5 RT in the league for the last 4 years.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News