- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We joked about Graham..but he's actually ruining Seattles run game (article)
Posted on 9/18/15 at 7:04 pm to cgrand
Posted on 9/18/15 at 7:04 pm to cgrand
in any event the OP is about how graham has ruined the Hawks run game which, I will repeat, after one game, is ridiculous
This post was edited on 9/18/15 at 7:04 pm
0
Posted on 9/18/15 at 7:08 pm to cgrand
quote:
so we give up the best weapon for scoring we have because the front office can't draft a center?
No, you trade a really good scoring option for one of the best centers in the league because even the best talent evaluators in the league don't come anywhere near a .1000 batting average and we needed a great center instantly. There was no margin for error. You may not like the result but the reasoning was perfectly sound.
This post was edited on 9/18/15 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 9/18/15 at 7:10 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
what is ruining their run game is the shitty make shift offensive line, not Graham.
Posted on 9/18/15 at 7:14 pm to Laaz2750
Stop it
Max unger is a good player
31 other teams have managed to get along without him
I doubt seriously they had no other options
Max unger is a good player
31 other teams have managed to get along without him
I doubt seriously they had no other options
Posted on 9/18/15 at 7:17 pm to cgrand
quote:
fricking patriots are starting an undrafted rookie for chrissakes
Posted on 9/18/15 at 7:19 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
His football reference page. Click touchdown tab. They document each TD along with its distance, quarter etc.
Thanks.
Posted on 9/18/15 at 7:24 pm to tduecen
Yup. Losing three linemen killed them. Graham not being a good blocker only compounds it but certainly isn't the root cause. Though having Graham is the reason they lost their best lineman (and a first).
This post was edited on 9/18/15 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 9/18/15 at 7:50 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
I'd be more concerned if we had actually attempted to target the endzone in the redzonr
Wasn't there a fade to Cooks in the endzone when yall were in the redzone? I specifically remember thinking if that was Graham, it would have been a TD. But that was just because it was a little above Cooks head, but had the pass been any lower it would have been an int.
Posted on 9/18/15 at 7:53 pm to Indfanfromcol
My buddy said Cooks was late getting his hands up and could have caught it. I would have to rewatch it.
Posted on 9/18/15 at 7:56 pm to Patrick O Rly
Maybe it was?
That was maybe the only play the entire game I specifically thought "Damn, they could have used Graham right there". Not to say the rookie linebacker and Unger haven't been worth it for yall, but that one play stood out in particular.
That was maybe the only play the entire game I specifically thought "Damn, they could have used Graham right there". Not to say the rookie linebacker and Unger haven't been worth it for yall, but that one play stood out in particular.
Posted on 9/18/15 at 8:00 pm to Indfanfromcol
Yes, they could have used Graham in that spot. I think Coleman has the ability to turn into a redzone target, but he's got some growing to do. Colston looks like poo. They're going to need to figure something out.
Posted on 9/18/15 at 8:01 pm to Patrick O Rly
So it seems Paddy.
I don't understand a lack of Hill in the RZ or any TE if I remember right.
I don't understand a lack of Hill in the RZ or any TE if I remember right.
Posted on 9/18/15 at 8:04 pm to goatmilker
The good news is I don't think we face another defense that fast this year.
Posted on 9/18/15 at 8:15 pm to goatmilker
Hill needs a lot more fun. Line him up in the slot. He's more athletic than any of our WR save Cooks
Posted on 9/18/15 at 8:28 pm to goatmilker
Jeremy Shockey wants to know what all the fuss is about
Posted on 9/18/15 at 8:30 pm to Laaz2750
You know that's lance Moore, right?
Posted on 9/18/15 at 8:32 pm to Lester Earl
ah shite, you're right. 
there you go
By the way my dopey mistake kind of helps me prove my point that we had plenty of red zone threats that season who weren't giant physical specimens.
there you go
By the way my dopey mistake kind of helps me prove my point that we had plenty of red zone threats that season who weren't giant physical specimens.
This post was edited on 9/18/15 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 9/18/15 at 9:18 pm to Patrick O Rly
quote:
Yes, they could have used Graham in that spot. I think Coleman has the ability to turn into a redzone target, but he's got some growing to do. Colston looks like poo. They're going to need to figure something out.
I think yalls FOH were so okay with trading away Graham and Stills because yall thought Colston would be a good #2 receiver. I don't know what happened, but he does not look good at all.
Posted on 9/18/15 at 9:33 pm to BestStop
quote:dumbass
Unger hasn't really been a difference maker on our OL either
Posted on 9/19/15 at 1:59 am to cgrand
quote:
how about keep graham and draft a center?
Could've drafted Martin last year in a draft full of shite outside of Cooks.
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News