- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Someone explain the Graham trade to me
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:24 pm to Tiger1242
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:24 pm to Tiger1242
quote:
re: Basketball- LSU 81 @ 78 Arkansas #18 Final Hornsby 3 at the buzzer!Tigers Win!! Posted by Tiger1242 on 3/7 at 3:07 pm If we shoot this with more than 5 secs left I'm going to murder a puppy... Posted on: Tiger RantJump to Post • View
Topic • Replies (1)
Liar
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 6:30 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:31 pm to jennyjones
How is Grahams shoulder? Did it weigh in on the decision?
I hate the move, but understand the move.
Like kicking onside in the Super Bowl. A frick yeah or frick off move.
Couldn't they have traded him to the Raiders though?
I hate the move, but understand the move.
Like kicking onside in the Super Bowl. A frick yeah or frick off move.
Couldn't they have traded him to the Raiders though?
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:41 pm to kengel2
The first round pick is #31 out of 32. You could almost look at it like a second round pick.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:43 pm to goatman1419
quote:
To to trade a TE and get an all pro Center a first round pick and free up money to sign other players is a black eye?? Wow your football Knowledge is laughable
Forgot to mention an All-Pro TE
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:45 pm to goatman1419
quote:
To to trade a TE and get an all pro Center a first round pick and free up money to sign other players is a black eye??
would you call this a reactive decision or a proactive decision?
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:46 pm to goatman1419
quote:
To to trade a TE and get an all pro Center a first round pick and free up money to sign other players is a black eye?? Wow your football Knowledge is laughable
he was traded 1 year into his multi-year deal and we wasted lots of cap space on his deal last year and will in 2015 also
that's a black eye, dude
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
from everything that I have seen it was pretty much a cap neutral deal in the sense of the overall contract lengths of both players
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:48 pm to goatman1419
He isn't just A tight end
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:49 pm to DenverTigerMan
quote:
Posted by DenverTigerMan The first round pick is #31 out of 32. You could almost look at it like a second round pick.
You could, if you had a certain narrative in mind you were trying to support. Otherwise you should just say the 31st pick of the first round.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:51 pm to gaetti15
quote:
from everything that I have seen it was pretty much a cap neutral deal in the sense of the overall contract lengths of both players
that's a sunk cost, and i get it
but if we had never signed graham to this deal, we would have had a bit more cap room last year and $9M more this year
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
Definitely reactive. We wouldnt have to shed salary if we didnt sign him in the first place. We wasted 9 mil an it was just last year
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
but if we had never signed graham to this deal, we would have had a bit more cap room last year and $9M more this year
True, but saying that assumes that we didn't try to do this last year.
Maybe they did, but couldn't find a decent trading scenario
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:53 pm to gaetti15
quote:
Maybe they did, but couldn't find a decent trading scenario
his stock was a lot higher last year. i can't imagine we settle for 50 cents on the dollar like we did today
i get the point in cutting and running now, but it has to be viewed as a mistake by the front office in hindsight
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:53 pm to Tiger1242
They did. They got Unger and a lst rounder.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
he was traded 1 year into his multi-year deal and we wasted lots of cap space on his deal last year and will in 2015 also
Last years deal is done. Obviously Sean was not happy about it either. They got rid of scouts, brought in new front office personnel and are now cleaning up the mess (hopefully).
No need to keep shitting on the them. You and Lester and a few others need your own thread to bleed all over.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:54 pm to Tiger1242
He and Brees accounted for 35.6 million of your cap space. Your shitty drafting meant you couldn't field other players for cheap, hence the fire sale. Your Mercedes in the driveway of your double wide wasn't working, so now you're trying to afford a bunch of Toyotas.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:55 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Your team sucks worse. Whats your excuse?
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:56 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
I don't think it was really about cap space
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
his stock was a lot higher last year. i can't imagine we settle for 50 cents on the dollar like we did today
that's just something we just don't know.
Plus if what is being reported by other sources is true, and he was presenting a locker room issue this year because of the issues with his resigning, then maybe the Saints didn't mind.
Idk, there is definitely more to this story
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News