- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/10/15 at 4:46 pm to tigerskin
Are people equating injured and soft?
Posted on 3/10/15 at 4:46 pm to JScoop8
Reggie Reggie Reggie !!...come in home
Posted on 3/10/15 at 4:46 pm to tigerskin
Are we going to pay Reggie, Jimmy money?
Posted on 3/10/15 at 4:47 pm to drizztiger
quote:
So y'all want Reggie but think Graham is soft?
apparently so
Posted on 3/10/15 at 4:48 pm to tigerskin
quote:
tigerskin
Seriously, another thread on this?
This comparison is pretty retarded too
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 4:50 pm to tigerskin
I don't think we need Reggie and don't really think Graham is soft
Posted on 3/10/15 at 4:59 pm to tigerskin
quote:
So y'all want Reggie but think Graham is soft?
Yes
Ones a rotational RB who is dangerous out the backfield, knows our system and fits it, will be a great conplementary RB to Ingram, and can be signed at a cheap price.
The other is a TE making top $$$, struggles with run blocking to the point that he had to come off the field because of it(which tells the D what we are doing), disappears in games when defenses gets physical at the line with him and has been punked by guys half his size, and had a problem with the staff ever since contract disputes didn't go his way last season. Graham has never played more than 70% of the snaps in games where he was active. So youre paying someone top $$$$ to sit on the bench for at least 30% of the snaps due to the fact that he is not physical and sucks at run blocking.
Oh and there's a difference in being soft as having an injury. When healthy, Reggie isn't soft. When healthy, Graham is still soft.
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 5:06 pm to KG5989
Couldn't have said it better. 
Posted on 3/10/15 at 5:30 pm to tigerskin
quote:
So y'all want Reggie but think Graham is soft?
nobody here wants Reggie Bush back on the Saints. Sproles was a huge upgrade over Bush and even he was expendable with the play of Pierre Thomas. Now Pierre Thomas is another story. We lost big time in letting him go and keeping Ingram.
Read some of the replies and apparently their are some supposedly Saints fans who would be HAPPY with Bush back on the team????
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 5:32 pm to tigerskin
and yet another rantard
Posted on 3/10/15 at 5:33 pm to boxcar willie
Gore just signed a 3year/$12 mil deal with Indy.
Vereen just signed a 3year/$12 mil deal with NYG.
Ingram's 4year/$16 mil deal is looking better and better for the Saints.
Vereen just signed a 3year/$12 mil deal with NYG.
Ingram's 4year/$16 mil deal is looking better and better for the Saints.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 5:35 pm to tigerskin
Bringing in Reggie as a role player 3rd down back for a low price is pretty different than wanting to pay $10 million for a TE that can't pass block.
I find it hard to believe people want Reggie for anything more than the above. If so, then they are crazy and your comparison still sucks.
I find it hard to believe people want Reggie for anything more than the above. If so, then they are crazy and your comparison still sucks.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 5:36 pm to drizztiger
quote:
drizztiger
We've been on the same page lately...
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 5:38 pm to drizztiger
quote:
Gore just signed a 3year/$12 mil deal with Indy.
Vereen just signed a 3year/$12 mil deal with NYG.
Ingram's 4year/$16 mil deal is looking better and better for the Saints.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 5:50 pm to KG5989
quote:Definitely.
We've been on the same page lately...
Posted on 3/10/15 at 5:52 pm to tigerskin
I dont want reggie at all. we are rebuilding the team and can find decent rb's late in the draft or as udfa. not to mention there are better backs available as free agents.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 5:53 pm to tigerskin
Obviously you can't compare smart and dumb so ill help..
You dumb son..
You dumb son..
Posted on 3/10/15 at 5:57 pm to tigerskin
I dont want REGGIE!
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:02 pm to diat150
quote:List please.
not to mention there are better backs available as free agents.
I'm not saying Saints SHOULD sign Reggie. But Reggie should be an option IF HEALTHY. The role would be mainly 3rd down back at a cheap cost.
I'm not sure what FA's would fit that bill right now. Forsett? He's 30 also. Helu? Both may strike deals with higher salary than Bush.
ETA: This is FA signing only. Draft/UDFA is fine with me.
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 6:03 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News