Started By
Message

re: should we give chase daniel a chance to see what he can do?

Posted on 9/20/17 at 8:25 pm to
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30020 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Yes! This is a great idea! And let's go ahead and give Dennis Allen another shot at head coach to see what he can do.


chase daniel has never started during the regular season but allen has coached 2 full seasons so you make a stupid analogy there.

but i can see all of you think we should never evaluate any players at all this year and keep the whole team since we havent determined who needs to go beyond a handfull of obvious frickups and next year they will all be super stars just because its a new year right
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 8:30 pm
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
32429 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 8:35 pm to
Another dumbass post.


You're approaching bromo level with stupidity
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 8:36 pm
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30020 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:31 pm to
ok, you are all on record stating we shouldnt evaluate the backup talent after we pass the point we can longer post a winning record.

dont want to hear you guys bitching at all next year about why it wasnt done this year when it no longer mattered if we win
Posted by saintsfan1977
West Monroe, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
7708 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

ok, you are all on record stating we shouldnt evaluate the backup talent after we pass the point we can longer post a winning record.





We havent passed that point yet. 2 games in. Its possible to get to 8-8.

Why didnt we see what Grayson had when we started 1-3/0-4? You arent making sense.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30020 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

You arent making sense.


its not my fault none of you ever bothered to read what you are so quick to disagree with.

i said from the beginning this was to be done when we had lost enough games to no longer be able to get a winning record and therefor the games no longer mattered.

but some here only see what they want to see and made stupid replies based on not reading what i said.

they stupidly assumed i was talking about starting daniel next week or something which would be ridiculous
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 10:49 pm
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43299 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 12:25 am to
Posted by saintsfan1977
West Monroe, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
7708 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 12:26 am to
quote:

starting daniel next week or something which would be ridiculous


Just as ridiculous to bench an elite QB thats healthy in favor of the backup. I could understand if Brees was throwing 3-5 picks every game but that isnt an issue. Its possible Brees and Payton are both here next year.
Posted by jkb531
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2008
183 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 7:56 am to
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72649 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 8:12 am to
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72649 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 8:14 am to
quote:

i said from the beginning this was to be done when we had lost enough games to no longer be able to get a winning record and therefor the games no longer mattered.



DUDE THIS IS THE NFL! not college! THAT shite has been suggested for years. you do not pay BREES TO SIT THE BENCH. regardless what anyone wants it is not happening. move on!
Posted by maxxrajun70
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2011
3726 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:34 am to
chase Daniel is absolute garbage
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
65962 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 10:58 am to
we already know he's worthless
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram