- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Predict sacks next year by our main guys upfront
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:29 pm to bonethug0108
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:29 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
I know Kik and Oak are a huge upgrade over Kruger.
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:29 pm to keakar
quote:
yes the players we picked at those spots were BPA and graded higher then the players we NEEDED that were there on the board for us and could help us win now. BPA is a BS rule that makes 7-9 teams stay as 7-9 teams while adding "stars" to their rosters.
Hard to follow your logic. So if a team takes a bunch of average players that they "need" won't they still be pretty bad?
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:30 pm to bonethug0108
I'm shocked that you'd come up with a number that seemed high
49 would have led the NFL last year as a team
49 would have led the NFL last year as a team
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:33 pm to GynoSandberg
Pretty sure both will easily beat 1.5 sacks. Wanna bet on that?
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:35 pm to Elleshoe
Jordan 13
Fairley 6
Rankins 8
Okafor 7
Kikaha 7
Hendrickson 1
Fairley 6
Rankins 8
Okafor 7
Kikaha 7
Hendrickson 1
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:36 pm to Elleshoe
307 sacks. Total. Championship.
shite.. The bartender is cutting me off
shite.. The bartender is cutting me off
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:36 pm to bonethug0108
What's a "huge upgrade" over 1.5?
I'll take the under on your 11 total that you predicted. I believe that'll go the way of your 12-4 prediction last year or Malcolm butler guarantee. Name the terms
I'll take the under on your 11 total that you predicted. I believe that'll go the way of your 12-4 prediction last year or Malcolm butler guarantee. Name the terms
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:36 pm to Lester Earl
Care to post a guess then? Or just do what you normally do?
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:48 pm to GynoSandberg
Make specific terms. Can't uphold a bet if it isn't clear what number is actually being bet on.
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:52 pm to GynoSandberg
Why would we want to get rid of 2 of the best posters on here for a year?
If either one of y'all are right, how about the other idiot predicting 1 sack per player on our main guys upfront.
Gonna have a 20+ sack drop this season
If either one of y'all are right, how about the other idiot predicting 1 sack per player on our main guys upfront.
Gonna have a 20+ sack drop this season
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:56 pm to Peazey
10 sacks or under, i win
11 sacks push
12 sacks or over, thuggy wins
I hope I lose
11 sacks push
12 sacks or over, thuggy wins
I hope I lose
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:56 pm to St Augustine
quote:
So if a team takes a bunch of average players that they "need" won't they still be pretty bad?
never said take any "average" players, there were lots of top rated defensive players that may not have been graded as high as lattimore but they were a better fit at a position of "need" for us and DONT have a history of constantly being on the sidelines with injuries.
hey if lattimore never gets hurt ever, wow, the saints will be geniuses for making that pick but that is an insane risky gamble you don't take when you have a 30th ranked defense that cant stop anybody. that's what im saying. we got into making a risky pick just because its a lottery ticket with great upside when there were less risky gambles that you needed there like taking Barnett or someone else they had in mind before lattimore fell to them. we needed a solid pressure DE at 11 and they had choices for us there that they let pass to taker the risky guy that's always injured hoping he magically somehow never has another injury. I see him as being another Robert meachum, lots of talent and skill but cant stay healthy
Posted on 4/29/17 at 8:02 pm to keakar
quote:
lattimore but they were a better fit at a position of "need
Wait, so cornerback wasn't a position of need?
quote:
hey if lattimore never gets hurt ever, wow, the saints will be geniuses for making that pick but that is an insane risky gamble
What?
Every player can get injured. Barnette could year his ACL day 1. You can pretty easily and accurately test out the flexibility and stability of a hamstring.
Barnette has had hamstring issues too btw....
quote:
that's always injured hoping he magically somehow never has another injury. I see him as being another Robert meachum, lots of talent and skill but cant stay healthy
Jesus Christ man. You can't make this shite up. How many games did Meachem even miss from 2009-2011? His problem wasn't his health with the Saints, he was just never more than a burner and a good blocker. His issue was talent.
And Lattimore played basically uninjured last season and was phenomenal. It's a fricking hamstring, he'll be fine if he takes care of his body.
-and that's said as someone who's torn their hamstring.
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 4/29/17 at 8:07 pm to TigerBait1127
last time I checked our corner backs weren't our main guys we rely on for pressuring the QB now were they?
Posted on 4/29/17 at 8:07 pm to GynoSandberg
Need bone to agree to the terms to make this official. Also, is this supposed to be a ban from Saints Talk or from tiger droppings?
As an aside ban bets are kind of silly. I need you on the fantasy board to keep me from fricking up my team too bad. Make like a sig or avatar bet if you are going to do one.
As an aside ban bets are kind of silly. I need you on the fantasy board to keep me from fricking up my team too bad. Make like a sig or avatar bet if you are going to do one.
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 4/29/17 at 8:09 pm to keakar
quote:
last time I checked our corner backs weren't our main guys we rely on for pressuring the QB now were they?
A pass rush is useless if the QB can unload the ball at will as we saw plenty last year
Also, just because a pass rush isn't a need, that doesn't mean that corner isn't also a need.
Furthermore?, we likely have the best defensive line we've had in the Payton era.
And on top of that, teams with great secondaries can generate quick throws and QB pressure via blitzing. See Arizona before Chandler Jones.
You seriously predicted 1 sack per main member of our front 4. that means that Cam, Fairley, and even Rankins all greatly reduce their totals from a season ago. He'll, Okafor had 3.5 last year in limited snaps.
Come on man, you're making a fool of yourself.
quote:
teams with double digit leads on us wont need to throw it so yes very few sacks
How many games did the Saints lose by double digits last year?
We have 3 players that are very, very good at generating pressure for their positions. We then have Okafor, Kikaha, Hendrickson to hold down the other side. One of those guys can get the job done. We're not worse.
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 4/29/17 at 8:15 pm to GynoSandberg
11 ain't a push. 10 or less you were right. 11 or more I was right. No pushing here. Either or.
Also hope you are wrong, but not to see you banned. Means a good year.
But I'm that confident in them.
Also hope you are wrong, but not to see you banned. Means a good year.
But I'm that confident in them.
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 8:16 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News