Started By
Message

re: Mark Ingram averaged 5.1 YPC last season, am I missing something?

Posted on 4/26/17 at 7:22 am to
Posted by oreeg
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
5280 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 7:22 am to
quote:

24chevrolet48



Did this guy leave the thread? I was enjoying his commentary.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71411 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 7:55 am to
quote:

He fumbled several times in key moments of games last year, lack of homerun hitter speed and bad attitude make him average


Wait you're mad about fumbling but you're excited about a notorious fumbler?
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
11713 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 8:16 am to
If he doesn't fumble against Seattle and get benched, while Hightower goes for over 100 yards, any non-Bama biased person would be praising him for a great year. That game and his temper tantrum against Arizona tainted his really awesome year.
Posted by 1ranter1
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
10396 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 8:34 am to
quote:

It's only Bc he played for Alabama.


Or because he was a first round pick who was garbage his first few seasons. Averaged 487 yards a season his first 3 years and topped that off with a huge fumble in the playoffs. Took him 6 years to finally have a good season.

frick Mark Ingram and frick Alabama
This post was edited on 4/26/17 at 8:35 am
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38378 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 8:40 am to
Posted by blueslover
deeper than deep south
Member since Sep 2007
22792 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 8:56 am to
didn't read the the thread but what you might be missing is the 133 carries that went out the door with Hightower. Ingram cracked 200 carries last year for the second time. He has averaged 169 carries a year. That isn't bellcow numbers. Definitely need a rotation back in the mix.

AP is a guy you don't wanna bet against. I like the risk versus the everyone said washed up Laurinitis.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39488 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 9:00 am to
I like MI and have no desire to trade him. I also think AP is a waste on money for us.

That said, to compare MI to McCoy and Eliot is insane. He grinds and cobbles together rather impressive stats by seasons end, but he lacks a lot of key attributes. He is not useful in goal line or third and short. He isn't a homerun threat. He doesn't block all that well and he's a marginal receiver out of the backfield.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84118 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 9:17 am to
quote:

He is not useful in goal line or third and short. He isn't a homerun threat. He doesn't block all that well and he's a marginal receiver out of the backfield.


He dropped like two passes last year, maybe. And he broke off several big runs as well. And now he's bad at blocking too?

This place never changes.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39488 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 12:57 pm to
Please don't overanalyze what I've said. He may not drop many balls, but he is not trusted as Bush and Sproles were as a receiver. And no, he most certainly is not known for blocking or short yardage. The guy has limitations.
Posted by tigerterrace
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Sep 2016
3397 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:26 pm to
This is my honest take...Full disclosure I am an Auburn fan...Not LSU so maybe you think that takes me further down the hate track on Ingram...It doesn't I love the Saints and I really do not give a crap who takes the ball over the goal line. Unlike Ingram..Cue temper tantrum.

With that being said I have never been in love with his style of running.

(1) I think that he runs upright a little too much like his shoulders are always square to the line. I prefer more (Bull) shoulders down going forward.

(2) Ingram is a player that has to see or find the whole instead of anticipating that the hole is there. I understand having vision this goes beyond this. There is a distinct hesitation after he takes the ball to read what he sees and sometimes especially on 3rd and 2 you have to go to the gap where the play is called. Short yardage plays happen fast.

(3) The average is always mentioned. The average is very good.

I have made a point over the last few years to study what the Saints do in certain situations. Yes---Often we will throw on 3rd and 2. Is this a product of Brees wanting a higher comp % or a believe by Payton that a pass is a better short yardage option...You can decide...

I have seen numerous times where I believe that Ingram has gotten the bare minimum out of a play. Maybe it is 1st and 10 and he gets 4 yards could he have lowered the shoulder and perhaps leaned forward for an extra yard...maybe so.

Everyone knows that we run the ball on 2nd and 10 after an incomplete pass...So I will give him that one. Just Payton's lame attempt to get Brees into a more manageable 3rd and 6...Often 3rd and 8.

When looking at the average I like to say lets take out the top 2 runs and lets take out the bottom two runs and see what we have...Nothing special...

His average was 5.1 and I know you can do this with everyone just pointing at average.

Ingram's longest run last year was 75 yards. If you remove that one run his average goes down to 4.74 still pretty good.

He had 2 runs over 40 and 4 runs over 20. So only 4 times in 205 carries did Ingram bust one for longer than 20 yards.

From 2011-2014 he never had a run longer than 35 yards.

I know the one run was 75 the other was at least 40 and two others where at least 20. That is 155 yards on 4 runs...Fantastic if that was in game

Again backing out those 4 biggest runs and I might be off by 20-25 yards depending on the actual yardage on those three carries..the average drops to 4.4 Still a decent NFL average...

I just have to go by the eye test and to me I always feel like Ingram has left some yards on the field. Had the same feeling when Bush constantly went out of bounds.
Posted by tigerclaws15
Member since Jan 2007
3482 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

He went to Bama so we don't like him. Most would rather have literally anyone else of equal (or maybe slightly less) value. It's stupid. What's even more stupid is not admitting it. Trying to make performance based arguments for your Ingram hate makes you look like an ignorant follower. Just admit you don't like him because he went to Bama. If we had Julio, I'd wanna trade him for Antonio Brown or OBJ. Just is what it is.



this is the dumbest thing I have seen on here today and that is saying something. Ingram is an OK back, that is all. He has not lived up to the hype coming off a Heisman trophy and the Saints trading back into the first to get him. I dont think anyone here would take Ingram over LF given the chance, even the biggest ff inbred Bama fans. I would take Julio over any receiver in football including OBJ. I would also love for Jonathen Allen to fall or draft Foster at 32.
Posted by WhySoSerious
No.
Member since Jan 2014
766 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 3:47 pm to
"This is the dumbest thi-" stfu. It's true. He's an above average back & I'm glad we have him. He's one of our best players so if you Dislike him for any other reason we're not watching the same game. If you were expecting big things from him without scouting him just because he won a heisman then that's your fault, idiot. He literally replaced a heisman winning #2 pick, we barely run the ball & he was never considered an all purpose back. If anything blame the FO for trading back up into the 1st to draft a rotation player. His numbers say he's better than OK. So wtf are you watching.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84118 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

He may not drop many balls, but he is not trusted as Bush and Sproles were as a receiver.


That doesn't mean he's bad at it like you claimed.
He's never been markets as a Sproles/Bush type back.
You're just reaching for insults.
quote:

And no, he most certainly is not known for blocking


This is bullshite.

quote:

or short yardage


Our run blocking has been suspect the last few years, but yes Ingram was not very good in short yardage early in his career.

quote:

The guy has limitations.




Sure, which is why you don't need to make shite up here.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115871 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 4:11 pm to
I predict Marlon Humphrey will be the guy that takes over for Ingram in the Saints Fans Hate category.

For some reason...
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38378 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

For some reason


Oh because both of them had fathers that played in the NFL. Legacies always get hated on

Assuming that's what you meant, can't really think of anything else those two have in common
This post was edited on 4/26/17 at 4:17 pm
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 4:27 pm to
He also has one of the lowest fumble per carry stats and he can block.
Posted by tigerclaws15
Member since Jan 2007
3482 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 5:20 pm to
You are an idiot and that's ok. He has never finished higher than 11th in yards. Most time out of the top 15. That the definition of average. No he doesn't carry the load like a true number 1 and that's because he is limited and can't do it. The guy plays in an offensive system where he never sees a stacked box. He was not worth the first round pick. That is why he is hated on. I don't hate the guy. I just know he is an average NFL back at best.
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
89954 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 5:34 pm to
One big reason Ingram did well last year is the holes he had, some of them big enough to drive a truck through.

3. New Orleans Saints (11th)
Pass-blocking rank: 9th

Run-blocking rank: 2nd

Penalties rank: 10th

Stud: This was the year that former second-round pick Terron Armstead proved he was a top-tier tackle.

Dud: Nothing overly terrible here, but Senio Kelemete had some issues in pass protection that shouldn’t be ignored.

Summary: The tackles are the most reliable players on this line, and the addition of Max Unger was certainly a good one (though you could debate whether the cost was worth it). Generally a really good run blocking outfit, let down only by their infrequent troubles protecting their QB up the gut.

PFF
Posted by cheeser
downtown Fishville
Member since Feb 2007
2500 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 5:47 pm to
What is the story on AP out of the backfield ? Man if he can catch he could have a big year.
Posted by Tigers2010
Member since Nov 2008
8805 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 5:50 pm to
Douchey ranttards are the one starting those threads, don't worry about them
This post was edited on 4/26/17 at 5:52 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram