- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
ESPN is doing their war room simulation right now and just did Saints
Posted on 4/13/17 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 4/13/17 at 8:12 pm
On the 11th pick and didnt see who had been selected, but the consensus was either Christian McCaffery or Reuben Foster at 11. However one of them wanted a corner and no corners were there worthy of pick 11.
So they "called the Patriots" and made a trade for Butler for #32 and a 3rd. I'm not crazy with us giving up another pick but whatever.
The Colts also called in. Offered #15, 3rd, and 4th for #11 but we turned it down in favor of Christian McCaffery.
#11 - Christian McCaffery
#32 - Malcolm Butler via trade
Thoughts?
So they "called the Patriots" and made a trade for Butler for #32 and a 3rd. I'm not crazy with us giving up another pick but whatever.
The Colts also called in. Offered #15, 3rd, and 4th for #11 but we turned it down in favor of Christian McCaffery.
#11 - Christian McCaffery
#32 - Malcolm Butler via trade
Thoughts?
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 11:51 pm
21
Posted on 4/13/17 at 8:17 pm to LSUZombie
in that scenario i'd trade down to the Colts, assuming no spot worthy DE or CBs were available.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 8:23 pm to LSUZombie
If the Colts offered a 3rd and 4th to move down 4 spots either someone super awesome fell to 11 or our pool of players worth picking at those spots is down to one and we don't want to risk it.
9 out of 10 we take that Colts trade. Also it isn't going to be 32 and another pick. 42 and another perhaps.
9 out of 10 we take that Colts trade. Also it isn't going to be 32 and another pick. 42 and another perhaps.
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 4/13/17 at 8:24 pm to LSUZombie
We gave up 32 AND a 3rd for Malcolm butler?
Wait
Wait
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 8:25 pm
Posted on 4/13/17 at 8:46 pm to St Augustine
Exactly. You'd do maybe 42 and 103 for Butler but not 32 and 103.
And then they turned down a third and fourth to drop down to 15.
And then they turned down a third and fourth to drop down to 15.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 8:52 pm to LSUZombie
Who went 1-10?
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:03 pm to LSUZombie
quote:And stopped there
ESPN is
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:05 pm to Jwho77
Yea, we can't give up 2 of our 2017 picks. I'd be ok with #32, or #42 & a 2018 3rd/4th rounder. Anything more than those 2 is giving up way too much value.
We need at least 4 picks in the 1st 3 rounds this year. If we lose a pick for Butler, we also lose the need to draft a CB, so 4 picks is perfect. Our biggest positions of need are loaded in the 1st 3 rounds. Need to take advantage of it & win now.
We need at least 4 picks in the 1st 3 rounds this year. If we lose a pick for Butler, we also lose the need to draft a CB, so 4 picks is perfect. Our biggest positions of need are loaded in the 1st 3 rounds. Need to take advantage of it & win now.
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:12 pm to LSUZombie
Tomorrows mocks will be the one's to pay attention to as they will be the one's to watch.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:23 pm to LSUZombie
quote:
The Colts also called in. Offered #15, 3rd, and 4th for #11 but we turned it down in favor of Christian McCaffery.
If Loomis turned that down I'd fricking hunt him down myself.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:32 pm to LSUZombie
McCaffery would be used well in the system. CSP would essentially just dust off his Bush and Sproles plays and put them back in the line-up. Not worth our 11th pick though
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:49 pm to LSUZombie
quote:
#11 - Christian McCaffery
#32 - Malcolm Butler via trade
That's just terrible
Posted on 4/13/17 at 9:55 pm to LSUZombie
quote:
The Colts also called in. Offered #15, 3rd, and 4th for #11 but we turned it down in favor of Christian McCaffery.
Why the frick wouldn't you take that unless you want Barnett there?
quote:
So they "called the Patriots" and made a trade for Butler for #32 and a 3rd.
frick Butler. Not worth a 32 and a 3rd. Do not want.
Regardless, ESPN is dumb AF. They should stick to liberal news.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:15 pm to LSUZombie
Colts trade offer would be take all day,unless someone fell to 11 we really wanted. So many good playera still left at 15th and another 3rd pick along with 4th. One would have to be crazy to turn that down. lol
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:36 pm to LSUZombie
wish people who did mocks would quit assuming NO is just going to make a deal for Butler and just make a pick for the Saints at 32
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:37 pm to LSU1215
quote:
Colts trade offer would be take all day,unless someone fell to 11 we really wanted
Agreed. If Lattimore, Hooker, or Barnett is there...I'd take them. Even Jonathan Allen if he falls & the scouts like him.
Barnett could make it to #15, but the Eagles pick #14 & they run a 4-3...their DE's also suck(so do their CB's). He might not make it past them.
If those guys are all gone, then it's a no brainer.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 10:39 pm to Dead End
quote:
Why the frick wouldn't you take that unless you want Barnett there?
even then, there is still a chance Barnett is still on board at 15
Posted on 4/13/17 at 11:00 pm to LSUZombie
quote:frick that.
So they "called the Patriots" and made a trade for Butler for #32 and a 3rd.
quote:That too.
The Colts also called in. Offered #15, 3rd, and 4th for #11 but we turned it down in favor of Christian McCaffery.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 11:08 pm to LSUZombie
quote:
The Colts also called in. Offered #15, 3rd, and 4th for #11 but we turned it down in favor of Christian McCaffery.
The Saints would be the dumbest mother fricking franchise in history if they turned this trade down.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 11:11 pm to lsusportsman2
Is this assuming Fournette is gone? I would rather bring in the hometown hero instead of McCaffery if we are taking a RB. I would line Fournette up at WR also.
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 11:12 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News