- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Which teams would you trade rosters including draft assets with?
Posted on 3/21/24 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 3/21/24 at 12:30 pm
Complete roster trade along with assets. Should be a pretty small list.
Denver - Yes, only because of Jokic. He's just that good.
OKC is the other obvious leading candidate. They're already better than us and have lots of young talent plus the biggest war chest. However, I'm not a huge SGA guy. I'm hoping his flopping and running into people for fouls is exposed in the playoffs. Also, Chet is an injury waiting to happen. Williams seems legit though even if he looks like a WNBA player. Giddey is not that great IMO.
So would I? No, but I'd have to think about it.
Minnesota - Hell no. Want no part of KAT and Gobert is gonna fall off a cliff. Plus, they have no war chest.
Boston - Tough one. Bad contract for Brown. Porzingis is a major injury risk and Jrue is old. I'm going to say no.
Milwaukee - Maybe just for Giannis. I'm not a Dame guy. He'll be totally washed in another year or so and not much else on that roster.
Houston - Intriguing because of the play of Sengun. Not a Green or Smith fan at all though so no.
Kings - No
Mavs - Maybe for Luka. Rest of roster is meh.
So all things considered, I think Denver is the only team I make the roster swap for. After that is OKC.
Denver - Yes, only because of Jokic. He's just that good.
OKC is the other obvious leading candidate. They're already better than us and have lots of young talent plus the biggest war chest. However, I'm not a huge SGA guy. I'm hoping his flopping and running into people for fouls is exposed in the playoffs. Also, Chet is an injury waiting to happen. Williams seems legit though even if he looks like a WNBA player. Giddey is not that great IMO.
So would I? No, but I'd have to think about it.
Minnesota - Hell no. Want no part of KAT and Gobert is gonna fall off a cliff. Plus, they have no war chest.
Boston - Tough one. Bad contract for Brown. Porzingis is a major injury risk and Jrue is old. I'm going to say no.
Milwaukee - Maybe just for Giannis. I'm not a Dame guy. He'll be totally washed in another year or so and not much else on that roster.
Houston - Intriguing because of the play of Sengun. Not a Green or Smith fan at all though so no.
Kings - No
Mavs - Maybe for Luka. Rest of roster is meh.
So all things considered, I think Denver is the only team I make the roster swap for. After that is OKC.
16
Posted on 3/21/24 at 12:31 pm to ghost2most
quote:if you pick DEN you have to pick BOS (assuming a ring is the goal)
Boston - Tough one. Bad contract for Brown. Porzingis is a major injury risk and Jrue is old. I'm going to say no.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 12:43 pm to cgrand
quote:
if you pick DEN you have to pick BOS (assuming a ring is the goal)
We'll see. I know they're the favorite, but I wouldn't be shocked if they don't come out the East.
Tatum is good but is that THAT good? I don't know. He's definitely not Giannis, Luka, Jokic good.
And I just think that Porzingis won't make it through the playoffs and they'll get knocked off.
Milwaukee, Cleveland and maybe even the Heat could possibly beat them.
They make it to the Finals, no way they beat Denver. Lakers crazily would also beat them imo.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 12:50 pm to cgrand
Only team to seriously consider is OKC. They are setup even more favorably than the Pels. Current roster makeup, Cap space and the plethora of future, 1st round picks are ridiculous for the Thunder.
Houston comes in a distant 2nd, but do they have their "star" player on the roster? Not so sure. Jalen Green and Segun? Idk.
Really don't like any other NBA roster compared to us. We got what we need to win a chip with a few tweaks...
Houston comes in a distant 2nd, but do they have their "star" player on the roster? Not so sure. Jalen Green and Segun? Idk.
Really don't like any other NBA roster compared to us. We got what we need to win a chip with a few tweaks...
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:10 pm to ghost2most
Spurs have a young Wemby and Vassell
and will have two high 1sts this year
and potentially 3 high 1sts next year
they will be a legit threat in 5 years or so
i want to win now, so no deal - but i could see myself regretting that decision
and will have two high 1sts this year
and potentially 3 high 1sts next year
they will be a legit threat in 5 years or so
i want to win now, so no deal - but i could see myself regretting that decision
This post was edited on 3/21/24 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:12 pm to Ijuschill1
Houston will be a problem in a couple. Not sure what assets they have.
The clear answer is OKC for future.
Right now, Boston or Denver for ring purposes.
The clear answer is OKC for future.
Right now, Boston or Denver for ring purposes.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:20 pm to SaintEB
quote:
Houston will be a problem in a couple. Not sure what assets they have.
Houston still has 2 (of 3) 1sts and 2 (of 4) first round swaps with the Nets from the Harden deal.
They won that for sure.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:26 pm to ghost2most
Trying to take bias out of it.
OKC. You have to do OKC.
Boston. Getting a championship is the goal and Boston looks like a semi lock to win one this year, which would make the trade worth it.
Milwaukee. This one is a toss up. I love Giannis.
Denver. I would almost argue no simply because I'm not sure they get another chip. I could be dead wrong on that but I just don't see it. But it's not like we're guaranteed a chip so which team would you rather watch/better outlook.
Houston. Nope.
Kings. Nope.
Mavs. Nope. I have a hard time seeing Luka ever winning a title and him and Kyrie are two of my least favorite players in the league so I wouldn't want that one just off of that. I said I'd take bias out of it but I can't with players i can't stand.
A team I think needs to be thrown into the mix is Utah. Simply based on draft capital. They have I think 11 first round draft picks in the next 4-5 years. You could turn those into gold. They are sitting very pretty, better than anybody in the NBA as far as assets go.
OKC. You have to do OKC.
Boston. Getting a championship is the goal and Boston looks like a semi lock to win one this year, which would make the trade worth it.
Milwaukee. This one is a toss up. I love Giannis.
Denver. I would almost argue no simply because I'm not sure they get another chip. I could be dead wrong on that but I just don't see it. But it's not like we're guaranteed a chip so which team would you rather watch/better outlook.
Houston. Nope.
Kings. Nope.
Mavs. Nope. I have a hard time seeing Luka ever winning a title and him and Kyrie are two of my least favorite players in the league so I wouldn't want that one just off of that. I said I'd take bias out of it but I can't with players i can't stand.
A team I think needs to be thrown into the mix is Utah. Simply based on draft capital. They have I think 11 first round draft picks in the next 4-5 years. You could turn those into gold. They are sitting very pretty, better than anybody in the NBA as far as assets go.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:33 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
A team I think needs to be thrown into the mix is Utah.
That's a good call.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:40 pm to SaintEB
San Antonio is a good add.
My list would in order would be.
Would trade with
1. Denver
Would consider trading with
2. OKC
3. San Antonio
4. Milwaukee
Probably wouldn't but would at least consider
5. Boston
6. Houston
My list would in order would be.
Would trade with
1. Denver
Would consider trading with
2. OKC
3. San Antonio
4. Milwaukee
Probably wouldn't but would at least consider
5. Boston
6. Houston
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:41 pm to ghost2most
quote:
Would consider trading with
2. OKC
This is kinda crazy. They have WAY more draft assets than us and anyone, and are already a higher seed than us.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:46 pm to ghost2most
I like our roster. Do one for coaches and front office next.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:55 pm to ghost2most
quote:f the goal of the exercise is win a title, then BOS and DEN are very obvious choices.
Which teams would you trade rosters including draft assets with?
I'd say OKC is an obvious choice too, but below BOS and DEN.
From there it's tough. I don't trust Dame in MIL. You get Giannis, so that alone is nice but just not sure.
I think PHI has a ton of cap space this offseason, right?
DAL just cause of Luka is in the mix
SAS, same as Luka, on the list just because of Wemby
But I think there are only 3 obvious ones. Obviously that changes as the years go by and the big market teams do what big market teams do, but right now, I only see 3.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 2:07 pm to ghost2most
Win now teams of Denver and Boston
Young teams that are exciting and have a good future. OKC, Houston, spurs.
Idk if I’d trade with spurs and Houston rn because I like winning but their future is very bright
Young teams that are exciting and have a good future. OKC, Houston, spurs.
Idk if I’d trade with spurs and Houston rn because I like winning but their future is very bright
Posted on 3/21/24 at 2:15 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
This is kinda crazy. They have WAY more draft assets than us and anyone, and are already a higher seed than us.
But we have the best player IMO. Zion will be better than SGA
Posted on 3/21/24 at 3:03 pm to ghost2most
Agree and I will add on Houston
Amen Thompson and Cam Whitmore are both legit and Jalen Green has been playing like an all star for the past 3 weeks or so. He’s not dead in the water yet. Udoka has gotten through to him.
Amen Thompson and Cam Whitmore are both legit and Jalen Green has been playing like an all star for the past 3 weeks or so. He’s not dead in the water yet. Udoka has gotten through to him.
This post was edited on 3/21/24 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 3/21/24 at 3:32 pm to 3PieceSpicy
quote:
Agree and I will add on Houston Amen Thompson and Cam Whitmore are both legit and Jalen Green has been playing like an all star for the past 3 weeks or so. He’s not dead in the water yet. Udoka has gotten through to him.
Dude there is no way I would trade this roster for Houston’s. Come on man. They have some decent guys but we definitely have the better roster in my opinion.
Sengun is the only legit guy who MAY be an all star currently on the roster. Jalen green has sucked all year except the last 2 weeks. Amen great defender but can’t shoot a lick. Whitmore is good but also inconsistent. Not to mention they’re not even currently a top ten team in the west.
This post was edited on 3/21/24 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 3/21/24 at 3:46 pm to ghost2most
OKC for sure.
Magic would be a dark horse choice. Very young stars.
Magic would be a dark horse choice. Very young stars.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 4:26 pm to ghost2most
A large chunk of OKC’s chest of picks are protected picks, so they’re not as valuable as they look on the surface.
Also something about OKC just feels alot Sacramentoish to me, where they’re overachieving but will be a quick playoff exit and drop back down to earth next season, especially as the NBA is starting to put more of an emphasis on defense and not rewarding players for just throwing their heads back trying to get a foul call.
I have to say, there are a couple players I would swap out, but I do love our roster and think we have a top 5 roster in the NBA, so there’s not much I would trade.
Also something about OKC just feels alot Sacramentoish to me, where they’re overachieving but will be a quick playoff exit and drop back down to earth next season, especially as the NBA is starting to put more of an emphasis on defense and not rewarding players for just throwing their heads back trying to get a foul call.
I have to say, there are a couple players I would swap out, but I do love our roster and think we have a top 5 roster in the NBA, so there’s not much I would trade.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 4:45 pm to Soggymoss
quote:
Also something about OKC just feels alot Sacramentoish to me, where they’re overachieving but will be a quick playoff exit and drop back down to earth next season, especially as the NBA is starting to put more of an emphasis on defense and not rewarding players for just throwing their heads back trying to get a foul call.
THIS
SGS is gonna get exposed when he can't flop at will.
And Chet is gonna get broken in half.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News