- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:14 pm to Cap Crunch
my 20 RAs worked
i'm most interested to see what we do with lance thomas. i've become attached to his once a month 10 point game
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:16 pm to quail man
I'm going to have to guess that they decline his option, unless they think he can play SF
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:19 pm to Cap Crunch
likely they do decline. i'm guessing they keep roberts also because i don't seem them keeping GV. but maybe they hold onto him.
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:21 pm to quail man
McNamara keeps throwing out the option of using Roberts as a potential sign and trade for Evans. I'd be down for that since it'd allow us to use Vasquez's higher trade value for a C or SF and still have 4 potential PG's on the roster (Holiday, Rivers, Evans, and Jackson)
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:22 pm to quail man
quote:I was watching around the horn earlier. for some reason they don't understand that this isn't our final roster. a few of them said bad move because we have a logjam of guards, referring to the tyreke offer. one or two of them were going crazy over the 6th man thing. I guess they don't understand you can get starter minutes coming off the bench if you play multiple position. these people are jokers
i don't seem them keeping GV
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:23 pm to Cap Crunch
LE would have a sad.
if we get Evans, there's no way they keep either GV or Roberts. would be absolutely no need for them. EG can run guard, evans can, and rivers can.
if we get Evans, there's no way they keep either GV or Roberts. would be absolutely no need for them. EG can run guard, evans can, and rivers can.
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:23 pm to Cap Crunch
quote:no problem with that
McNamara keeps throwing out the option of using Roberts as a potential sign and trade for Evans
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:24 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:
I was watching around the horn earlier. for some reason they don't understand that this isn't our final roster. a few of them said bad move because we have a logjam of guards, referring to the tyreke offer. one or two of them were going crazy over the 6th man thing. I guess they don't understand you can get starter minutes coming off the bench if you play multiple position. these people are jokers
was Bomani on? that's my boy
i think those guys have a hard time wrapping their minds around the changing of how positions are used in the NBA
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:25 pm to quail man
Yeah, I like Roberts, but it seems like with the additions of Holiday, Evans, and Jackson, you'd have to get rid of 2 out of the 3 between Vasquez, Rivers, and Roberts, and right now, the coaches and FO seem much more committed to Rivers than the other two (and rightfully so)
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:27 pm to Cap Crunch
i think Roberts will have a good chance elsewhere to shine and become a really good backup guard. i just don't think it's here. i wish the Pels had more minutes to offer him.
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:28 pm to quail man
quote:nah it was Israel, Jackie, woody and bill. that count Jackie said tyreke needs to go to a place with veterans it was bad move for nola. I think bill or maybe it was woody liked the move and mentioned the 6th man bit and isreal started freaking out about him coming off the bench.
was Bomani on? that's my boy
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:29 pm to quail man
I just hope that, if Evans is so hellbent on not being a 3, we are able to make a move so that Darius Miller is not in our starting lineup.
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:29 pm to quail man
quote:lester will be pissed
i think Roberts will have a good chance elsewhere to shine
Posted on 7/2/13 at 6:33 pm to quail man
Do you guys think Roberts, Gravy, and Lopez will all be packaged in the same deal, or do you see the three of them being dealt in separate deals?
BTW: Was it you, Quail, who wanted to be PT admin? I support that. How does one go about nominating someone for admin status?
BTW: Was it you, Quail, who wanted to be PT admin? I support that. How does one go about nominating someone for admin status?
Posted on 7/2/13 at 8:57 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
quote:
Do you guys think Roberts, Gravy, and Lopez will all be packaged in the same deal, or do you see the three of them being dealt in separate deals?
i think the latter 2 will be dealt together if demps has it his way, and roberts will be in his own deal.
quote:
BTW: Was it you, Quail, who wanted to be PT admin? I support that. How does one go about nominating someone for admin status?
yes it was. i don't think you can nominate...you have to be chosen, i think. kinda like the matrix
Posted on 7/4/13 at 11:15 am to quail man
pretty good offseason
Posted on 7/4/13 at 11:17 am to Fearthehat0307
Really do wonder what EG thinks of all this.
Posted on 7/4/13 at 10:31 pm to quail man
Updated with trade agreement and projected depth chart.
Posted on 7/6/13 at 7:18 pm to Broski
i asked 42 in another thread but this might be a better place for it. what is our cap situation gonna look like next offseason? i'm not familiar with all the details of the financial aspects of what we can do. i know without trading we about tapped out for this season except for a couple of mil. how much we gonna have available to work with following this season?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News