Started By
Message

re: How much will Asik get next season?

Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:26 pm to
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30109 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:26 pm to
There are 19 centers getting paid more than asik. His worth is valuable at 10-12 with the cap hike. Any more and he's not worth it. His health isn't an issue either. He's one dimensional but he is great at it.

Issue with comparing players thay cost less than asik is who is available to us? The ones better than him are untouchable some are also more one dimensional offensively and we don't need an offensive center.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422407 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

For example, say we sign Asik to a similar contract to Bogut. In two years from now if Asik is performing at a 8 million dollar level, you still have to take the 12 million dollar cap hit. lol.

Posted by TheJruth
New Orleans - Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2014
323 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:31 pm to
Just a little unsure if people understood that aspect.

Lots of well we have his bird rights so that means we can maximize Asik's value, which is wrong. Bird rights basically allows you to maximize the value of your cap to sign a particular player in ONE given year.
Posted by Jamohn
Das Boot
Member since Mar 2009
13544 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:35 pm to
The definitions of "$8 million level" and $12 million level" are about to change drastically. It will be a great thing to be able to use today's definitions now and apply them to the new world after they change.

Plus, this one year is probably the buyer-friendly center market we will have in several years.
Posted by TheJruth
New Orleans - Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2014
323 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:35 pm to
Don't disagree with any of that. Just my opinion that his value is at 8-10 million dollars a year. If Dell thinks it is at more, then I don't have an issue with Dell resigning him.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30109 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:51 pm to
The numbers I'm using anticipate that hike.
Posted by Hazelnut
Member since May 2011
16433 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Yup. Put me on the list of people who have been satisfied with what Asik has brought to the table. I think he's done exactly what we brought him in to do and he's had a major positive impact. 

Same here. It seems many of you forgot about stiemsma being our center. Never again. Give me Asik and his terrible hands at 11 million.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25513 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

His worth is valuable at 10-12 with the cap hike.


for 1 year sure, for 3-4 years, no.

quote:

He's one dimensional but he is great at it.


He's great at it at times, and against certain teams. I'm ok with this, but i'm not down for paying a guy 12 million a year for the next 3 years to be great defensively against 10 teams, mediocre against the other 20 and atrocious on offense against all 30.
If he would play with the energy he had in the second half all the time, i'd like to keep him. But something has held him back this year and he doesn't give that energy too often. Maybe he needs to get clocked in the face more often.

quote:

Issue with comparing players thay cost less than asik is who is available to us?


Speights is basically the same size as Asik, can play defense good enough and you actually have to account for him on the offensive side of the court. He will be cheap, much cheaper than Asik, and we wouldn't be any worse or better with him over Asik. There's a ton of rookie contract guys out there that are better than Asik. Some of those guys are on teams that are loaded at center and can afford to get rid of 1. Denver got rid of Mozgov b/c Hickson is servicable and Nurkic is the new young guy. Same with Utah with Kanter/Gobert. Brooklyn has 3, Philly has 3, Memphis has Koufas not playing enough, the Bucks have 3, Cleveland has 5, Portland has 3. Trades can happen.

quote:

The ones better than him are untouchable some are also more one dimensional offensively and we don't need an offensive center.


There is no one worse offensively than him.
Asik is negative two dimensional offensively. I agree we don't need an offensive center. We don't need a center at all if you ask me. We'd be find with a bunch of big guys that can attempt to defend some of the premier centers in the league and if Ryno ever gets his groove back, he's in the game when it matters. WHy pay a guy 12 million a year for multiple years to play against a handful of teams and be putrid on offense all the time? I'd rather pay Speights and Turiaf, or Turiaf type player, a combined $4-5 million than keep Asik. This is all assuming Ryno, or some other 4 plays like they are supposed to.

When Asik doesn't give maximum effort, he's pretty worthless. I'm tired of seeing non-nba Asik and then NBA starting 5 Asik, never knowing which one will show up.It's not a talent he lacks when he sucks, it's effort, and i don't get it, and i've had enough of it.
His inconsistency is the main reason why i don't like him, and don't want him, not the fact that he can't catch, shoots 50% from the field despite 99% of his shots coming on dunk/layup attempts, and doesn't know how to dribble or shoot a basketball.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422407 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Speights is basically the same size as Asik,

wrong

quote:

can play defense good enough

wrong

quote:

and you actually have to account for him on the offensive side of the court.

well he's an offensive 4

quote:

and we wouldn't be any worse or better with him over Asik.

you want to roll out a starting front court of 6-11, 235-ish AD and a 6-9 center? neither of whom who can anchor the rim? both who like to shoot jumpers
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30109 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 3:00 pm to
If he said Speights over ajinca and ryno, I'd agree
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422407 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 3:00 pm to
at this point i'd agree b/c i don't know if rybot is coming back and he's making a ton of $
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25513 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

you want to roll out a starting front court of 6-11, 235-ish AD and a 6-9 center? neither of whom who can anchor the rim? both who like to shoot jumpers



He's 6'10" 255, don't know his wingspan, but he's likely the same or close to the same as Asik. Neither can jump, and are both big bodies. Speights rebounds well. Give him minutes with AD, and he'll pull down 9-10 boards a game just b/c he's big, like Asik.

Asik doesn't anchor the rim enough for me to care. He's so slow that he can never recover if his guy is setting the pick. The only time he's effective is when he's already standing under the rim, and smart teams just take him away from it and make him useless.

I'm not saying Speights is better than Asik defensively. All i'm saying is he's not terrible, but he's a lot cheaper. A LOT. And our defense could be better with better pick and roll defensive strategy, regardless of who's at cetner.

WHat's wrong with a center that can make a shot? You think it's good for our team when Asik gets the ball at the free throw line and Bogut stands under the goal gaurding it like he did when he playied biddy basketball when he was 12?
There is no spacing on offense at all when Asik is on the court. The only attention you give to playing defense against him is making sure you don't get an illegal defense called.

Playoff teams know how to make him very uneffective on both ends of the court, so what's the point of having him? to win 45-50 games in the regular season and do nothing in the playoffs, while spending 12 million a year on him?
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30109 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 3:29 pm to
Speights: currently 27; 6'10 245lbs
averages 16 MPG, highest avg is 22.4 in 2011-2012
10.4 PPG, 4.3 RPG
14.5 TRB%
108 ortg (career avg 106)
102 drtg (T-2nd best, best was 98, career 104)

Asik: currently 28; 7'0 255lbs
averages 26 MPG, highest avg is 30.0 in 2012-2013.
7.3 PPG, 9.8 RPG
21.4 TRB%
112 ortg (career best, career avg 107)
105 drtg (career worst, best was 92, career 101)
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422407 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

WHat's wrong with a center that can make a shot?

other than the fact that he's a 4, nothing

what kind of D will AD/speights be able to provide? nothing
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61482 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Speights rebounds well. Give him minutes with AD, and he'll pull down 9-10 boards a game just b/c he's big, like Asik.


You know what's more flawed than Asik's offense, your assumptions about replacing him. Asik is a career 13.4 per 36 rebounder with a career 21.0 TRB%. That's an elite rebounder. Speights is 9.8 and 15.6% That makes him a shade better than Robin Lopez (8.6 13.3%), but not even as good as Greg Monroe (10.6 16.9%). Also, Speights is not available as I'd imagine Golden State will keep him on the cheap year he has left.

quote:

WHat's wrong with a center that can make a shot?


I think Asik's offensive ineptitude is a big deal. As much penetration as our guards get, a young Tyson Chandler would make this team near unstoppable. But that doesn't change the fact that you can't wish and assume your way out of the situation we are currently in which is what you are trying to do. Just because Asik is flawed does not mean that he isn't our best available option for next year.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25513 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Speights: currently 27; 6'10 245lbs


He's 255. He's a Center.

I'm not saying he's this guy that so much better.
He's a decent C. He makes 3 million a year. That's the number that matters to me.

quote:

what kind of D will AD/speights be able to provide? nothing



same as AD/Asik the way we play the pick and roll probably

Speights will make 3-4 times less than Asik next year. He won't cost us any games next year, assuming Ryno returns to his old self.

So what if we give up 4-6 more points on defense when he's in teh game compared to Asik. We will be better on offense to make up the difference. He wouldn't make us better, and he wouldn't make us worse, but he would allow us to pay guys that actually make a difference on the court.


Have you guys not heard the national guys point out how terrible he's been?
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25513 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

But that doesn't change the fact that you can't wish and assume your way out of the situation we are currently in which is what you are trying to do. Just because Asik is flawed does not mean that he isn't our best available option for next year.


Just b/c we might not have another option, doesn't mean we have to make a bad long term decision this year. We have to look further than 1 year, especially with the big free agency after next year.

Resign him to whatever for 1 year, i'm ok with that. I think we can be really good with a healthy team and a Ryno that starts playing like the old Ryno.

i'm not on board with signing him to a long term deal just b/c we can and there's no one else thats decent to get, unless it's for under $10 million a year and he starts playing with more effort.

The only way we make the playoffs next year is if we don't have injuries, win 50+ games or hope someone has the injury bug like OKC. The West will be better next year. Utah and Phoenix can make a push next year and the top 9 from this year will all win 50 games if they are relatively healthy.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61482 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Just b/c we might not have another option, doesn't mean we have to make a bad long term decision this year.


I agree, this discussion has lead me to favoring a 1 year deal for Asik and keeping our options open.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25513 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

I agree, this discussion has lead me to favoring a 1 year deal for Asik and keeping our options open.



I think that would be ideal for this team right now, but what happens if he says no to that? do you let him walk if he wants to much? what's the threshold annual salary if it's multi-year? I still say $8-10 million, and i still don't feel good about it, but like you said, what else can we do? suck it up for a year with the likes of Turiaf Joel Anthony type players?
Posted by sma19
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2011
335 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

I think Asik's offensive ineptitude is a big deal. As much penetration as our guards get, a young Tyson Chandler would make this team near unstoppable. But that doesn't change the fact that you can't wish and assume your way out of the situation we are currently in which is what you are trying to do. Just because Asik is flawed does not mean that he isn't our best available option for next year.


I was thinking about this earlier, if Willie Cauley-Stein falls to Sacramento(6th)/Detroit(8th)/Charlotte(9th) in the draft, do you think they would go for a Ryno + next years 1st for WCS?

Essentially a young Tyson Chandler and NBA ready right out the draft.

We could still resign asik if we wanted to let WCS come off the bench for his rookie year and then move asik after.


Hell if Sac town is down for that trade we could take Justice Winslow instead (if he falls to 6) and then resign Asik and have our SF woes potentially fixed
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram