Started By
Message

Does a Demps / Thibs pairing make any sense?

Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:00 am
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115738 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:00 am
I've been a Thibs proponent for awhile now, but playing Devil's Advocate here...

Thibs doesn't make a whole lot of sense when paired with Dell, right?

First of all, from everything I've heard, Demps' "vision" won out over Monty's vision. And again, from everything I've heard, Demps wants to run a faster paced, ball movement offense.

I don't think anyone would consider Thibs offense to be "fast paced" by any stretch of the imagination, or great at spacing and ball movement. So if that is what Demps wants...then how does Thibs make any sense whatsoever?

Just food for thought.

In addition, I saw a thread from a disgruntled Bulls fan on RealGM this morning. Here was the comment:

quote:

He's been exposed the worst this series. I'm sorry. I love the bulls but watching his out of bounds play calling, lack of mid game adjustments, and lack of flexibility with his line ups makes me so damn mad. smh.


Obviously its just some fan. But aren't these the things we criticize Monty about? Just thought it was amusing.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52606 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:02 am to
I don't think he goes for thibs.
Posted by MrPel
Member since Dec 2014
2342 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:03 am to
Thinking about the same things. However, both Monty and Tom T preach defense, but thibs has proven he can turn a team into an elite defense. Our offense will steadily improve under AD and a healthy roster. Under Williams, I just couldn't see us drastically improving since we haven't in 4 seasons. There would be an immediate improvement with thibs on D and our offense would be similar, which is fine IMO.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166246 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:05 am to
malone or the euro spur is probably more like what we realistically get.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
87437 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:07 am to
honestly he doesn't make a lot of sense for NOLA

perhaps his success in Boston was due to the fact that he only managed the Celtics defense and Doc handled the offense and plays out of timeouts. The Bulls play hard for him and seem to respect him but he really doesnt make things easier for them

Thibs would probably be great in a place like LAC or CLE where he has a ball dominator that shares and makes things easier for their team mates. In Chicago, Rose doesn't really do much for his team mates and that puts a lot of pressure on Thibs to create offensive opportunities. Rose is averaging 6.5 assists/game in the playoffs and 4.9 assists/game in the regular season.
Posted by dafif5
Member since Nov 2012
629 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:31 am to
Thibs likes to slow it down ala Monty. We need to run. Team Malone, Tyronn Lue, or Hoiberg here.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61489 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:43 am to
Monty has had a top 10 offense at a slow pace too, but outside of the injury riddled years where they tried to have Luol Deng be their #1 option, Chicago has had productive offenses under Thibs.

ORting/Drtg
11th/1st
5th/2nd
23rd/6th
28th/2nd
11th/11th

If he can turn this into a top 3 defense while maintaining a top 10 offense, does pace/style matter? You don't want your money invested in pieces the coach won't use, but Ryno and Tyreke aren't untradeable. And in theory Thibs would make better use of AD/Asik/Jrue/Cole/Pondexter than most other coaches, so you'd be getting a better return from those investments.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32445 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 12:30 pm to
Are we sure that Demps wants a faced paced offense? He has some pieces in place to fit a Thibs style coach (Asik, AD, Jrue). If he wanted a fast paced offense why would he trade for a lumbering big man?
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 12:41 pm to
Asik did very well in a face paced houston offense.

Monty was also part of it too imo.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115738 posts
Posted on 5/15/15 at 9:56 pm to
The more I think about it the less sense it makes.

I keep hearing Bulls fans talking about his style of offense and it doesn't fit what Dell wants AT ALL.

I'm kind of conflicted.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61489 posts
Posted on 5/16/15 at 6:58 am to
Thibs has some of the same negatives as Monty, but his defense is a huge trump card. He probably wouldn't have known what to do with Tyreke at first either, but he would have known how to get the most out of Asik from day 1. With Thibs and just a few roster moves I can see this team jumping a full playoff tier and go from fighting to make the playoffs to fighting for home court in the 1st round. It's hard to make that kind of tier jump without a major talent upgrade.

Having the same negatives as Monty in addition to Thibs own negatives of wearing down players is cause for concern and like I've said I don't think he is the 1st choice. But the positives he can bring can't be ignored and I don't think we should be upset if he ends up being the guy. Short of hiring someone like Jackson, the team is almost in a can't lose situation.
Posted by ThePistol
Lafayette, LA
Member since Mar 2007
1524 posts
Posted on 5/16/15 at 7:47 am to
Thibs brings some concerns, I don't think anyone can argue that. However, the biggest difference between Thibs and Monty is that Thibs has always gotten the max out of his players.

Jrue, Tyreke, EG, and Asik have all had much better seasons elsewhere. That's 4 of our top 6 players. Obviously, injury issues have occurred with Jrue and EG, but even before injuries neither were putting up career numbers offensively or defensively. How many times this season did one of us say that more set plays could have been drawn up for EG to get going? Monty had no clue as to how to maximize Asik. He was constantly asked to do what he was incapable of.

I would contend that the post Rose injury rosters in Chicago were very limited. He was who that team was built around, especially offensively, and he has not been available. I can't think of a player who left Chicago and became better. Nor can I think of a player who came to Chicago and became worse. Even an offensive centric guy like Gasol just had a career revival type year under Thibs. Hell, if Gasol doesn't rip his hamstring, the Bulls probably beat the Cavs.

I agree with ATL. Despite his concerns, he is the only coach who instantly raises us a playoff tier. He would have a healthy superstar to build around and our abysmal defense would instantly improve. I think this is all stuff that Demps would be in favor of.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115738 posts
Posted on 5/16/15 at 7:59 am to
I completely agree he raises this team a playoff tier. I'm on board.

However, the things that Bulls fans are saying IS legit concerning. His offensive system is pretty shitty no matter the alleged numbers, he's stubborn, refused to adapt his offensive philosophy to the modern game, doesn't rotate well etc. allegedly.

Again I'm on board just playing devils advocate here.

If I'm Dell I'm really wanting him to bring in a top offensive assistant.
Posted by Solo
Member since Aug 2008
8240 posts
Posted on 5/16/15 at 12:06 pm to
If Dell wants to keep his job, Thibs is the safest choice.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 5/16/15 at 5:25 pm to
Lowe had a pod w/ Chris Hayes (no politics, just a die hard Bulls guy) discussing Chicago a couple of weeks ago. Lots of Thibs talk.

The minutes and offense scare me a bit. I think Thibs is great and I would be happy if they got him. But I would hope they make it clear that he can't run guys into the ground and that he has to bring a modern, top notch offensive guy with him.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61489 posts
Posted on 5/16/15 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

run guys into the ground


Then give him plenty of players he'll play. How do you get a capable back up for AD is a good question, but what I proposed the other day, turning Ryno into Deng, spending the MLE on Dunleavy and trading Tyreke for an athletic backup big to spell AD, and you're 9-10 deep with guys Thibs will happily play.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 5/16/15 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

Then give him plenty of players he'll play


That's it though- he ran Deng into the ground. Noah too. He's doing it with Butler.

Again, he's a great coach. But I don't trust him managing minutes for Davis or Holiday at all.

quote:

turning Ryno into Deng, spending the MLE on Dunleavy and trading Tyreke for an athletic backup big to spell AD, and you're 9-10 deep with guys Thibs will happily play.


No offense, but ugh.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63495 posts
Posted on 5/16/15 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

I think Thibs is great and I would be happy if they got him. But I would hope they make it clear that he can't run guys into the ground and that he has to bring a modern, top notch offensive guy with him.


Kind of where I am on the issue. I am intrigued by a couple of other possibilities, though.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61489 posts
Posted on 5/16/15 at 6:32 pm to
You don't have to get Deng and Dunleavy but this is a problem that I don't think you'll change by mandate, you'll change it by getting him enough players he trusts. This is a negative that should certainly be a consideration of both whether you want him as a coach and the direction of the roster going forward. If you have to trade your depth to get a star in the future, get ready to have the remaining starters play big minutes.
This post was edited on 5/16/15 at 6:33 pm
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 5/16/15 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

you'll change it by getting him enough players he trusts


I don't know about that. He's been in Chicago long enough to have "his guys."

quote:

"to me, the only way a team can improve is you have to be sharp. The way you execute in this league is through repetition, and that's both offensively and defensively. You're not going to rest your way to success."


LINK


LINK

quote:

if you have to trade your depth to get a star in the future, get ready to have the remaining starters play big minutes.



I think this is where a good coaching staff and front office make their money. Create systems and find players that can max out in the role you give them. It's not easy, but it can be done.

ETA: Playoffs are a different story entirely. You have to get their first, of course. But,I agree with those who claim the game has changed in ways that make it more taxing on bodies than in the past.
This post was edited on 5/16/15 at 6:56 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram