- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:00 pm to danman6336
It's more about paying 20 mil to 2 guys who can do the same thing. Neither of which can shoot
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:01 pm to danman6336
quote:
Yea who needs athletic wing players that can create their own shot in the NBA...
Theyve got 3 already.
How many basketballs you think they will play with?
And I guarantee Derozans ball wont find Davis nearly enough for anyone
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:01 pm to eyeran
quote:If this move doesn't go with a move to get rid of Gordon, then I agree, it is a stupid trade and it shouldn't happen
Because what this team needs is more guards and to get smaller...
But if they move Gordon for a big + this trade, I'm not sure how you don't jump on that
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:02 pm to Fun Bunch
I am not crazy about DeRozan as far as a fit, but
I think he would be another nice piece for a bigger move
quote:
Acquire assets
I think he would be another nice piece for a bigger move
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 8:03 pm
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:02 pm to corndeaux
SG player ratings per CBS
for what its worth,
#4 Derozan
#51 Gordon
for what its worth,
#4 Derozan
#51 Gordon
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 8:03 pm
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:03 pm to danman6336
quote:
But if they move Gordon for a big + this trade, I'm not sure how you don't jump on that
So what's part 2? Like I said this it the type of trade you have to make to get value so even if the rumor isn't legit it seems plausible. Would part 2 be Gordon for Al Jefferson? What bigs are both decent and available for the price of Gordon?
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:05 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
Would part 2 be Gordon for Al Jefferson?
I would make man milk. No way Charlotte does that.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:06 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
Would part 2 be Gordon for Al Jefferson? What bigs are both decent and available for the price of Gordon?
You are trying to kill me tonight with these trades.
Luckiky, Charlotte has no reason to do that.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:06 pm to TigerinATL
I don't really know how the market works well enough to make a good guess, but I would assume a big like Jefferson is out of the question
I dunno, maybe something along the lines of a Spencer Hawes or maybe Pekovic with another piece or two
I don't see Pek happening with how K-Mart is playing this year though
Hawes seems like a good fit for both teams though
I dunno, maybe something along the lines of a Spencer Hawes or maybe Pekovic with another piece or two
I don't see Pek happening with how K-Mart is playing this year though
Hawes seems like a good fit for both teams though
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:07 pm to CecilShortsHisPants
quote:
#4 Derozan #51 Gordon
Last season. You got any current numbers?
We all know Gordon has injury issues
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:08 pm to corndeaux
Varajeo? Waiters is pretty terrible, they could use a 2
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:09 pm to corndeaux
quote:
Last season. You got any current numbers?
Didn't realize that was a season ago. Derozan is playing better this year than last though.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:11 pm to danman6336
quote:
Varajeo? Waiters is pretty terrible, they could use a 2
I would love to get Varajao. I really like Tristan Thompson too, but Cleveland just extended his contract so I doubt they'd let him go.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:14 pm to CecilShortsHisPants
Varajao/Waiters for Gordon/Rivers works, numbers wise. FYI. Not saying it would be a deal or not.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:14 pm to CecilShortsHisPants
They are about the same this year. Derozan is having the better year, but not by much.
I dont mind Derozan if they are moving Gordon/Evans. Not a huge fan of his and he doesnt play good defense, but hes a solid player. Just makes absolutely no sense if they still have Gordon/Evans on the roster.
I dont mind Derozan if they are moving Gordon/Evans. Not a huge fan of his and he doesnt play good defense, but hes a solid player. Just makes absolutely no sense if they still have Gordon/Evans on the roster.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:15 pm to danman6336
Derozan has carried his team's offense and been forced to takea lot of difficult shots. He's a solid inch and a half taller than reke and a better athlete. When he dribbles, he's looking to score, unlike reke.
Dude has a lot more MJ in him than anyone else on our team. If I'm comparing derozan and EG, derozan is a poor man's MJ and EG is a poor man's gail goodrich. Dude brings a lot of energy and passion. I'd love for him to replace EG or tyreke. Him and reke are both poor 3 point shooters, but we've also got a 3 point shooting PF and no bigs that get to the rim.
Dude has a lot more MJ in him than anyone else on our team. If I'm comparing derozan and EG, derozan is a poor man's MJ and EG is a poor man's gail goodrich. Dude brings a lot of energy and passion. I'd love for him to replace EG or tyreke. Him and reke are both poor 3 point shooters, but we've also got a 3 point shooting PF and no bigs that get to the rim.
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:17 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:19 pm to corndeaux
quote:
corndeaux
That trade would be legit.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 8:26 pm to Spellingmaster
looks good for the pellies but it looks like the rockets are about to move asik and get the alphabet guy/ilyasova.
Page 2 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News