Started By
Message

re: What is the greatest thing to ever happen to music?

Posted on 12/12/11 at 3:38 pm to
Posted by Leauxgan
Brooklyn
Member since Nov 2005
17324 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 3:38 pm to
I will treat myself on Spotify, letch'yall know what percentage of my mind is blown.
Posted by bomber77
Member since Aug 2008
14783 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 3:45 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/12/11 at 5:02 pm
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18415 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

The Beatles were pop

The Beatles existed after the black and white days of the early 60s.

Please listen to:

Sgt Pepper's
Magical Mystery Tour
Abbey Road

^then get back with me on the pop thing
This post was edited on 12/12/11 at 5:51 pm
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18415 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

The Rolling Stones > The Beatles








Posted by Leauxgan
Brooklyn
Member since Nov 2005
17324 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:54 pm to
I'm a huge Beatles-tard, but it's hard to contradict that their hooks and baroque approach to songwriting aren't engineered to be insanely melodic, saccharine, and catchy.

The second half of Abbey Road is one of the most fluid 20 minutes of pop ever made, imo.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59448 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 6:04 pm to
Help from my Friends
Lucy in the Sky
When I'm sixty four
Here comes the sun
Octopus' Garden
Penny Lane
Baby your a Rich Man
All you need is Love
Never Give me my money
Hello Goodbye


All pop sounding tunes to me. Just not the bubble gum pop you're thinking of.
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
28602 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 6:17 pm to
There is nothing pop about helter skelter, Shes so heavy, benefit of mr kite or happiness is a warm gun though
Posted by Leauxgan
Brooklyn
Member since Nov 2005
17324 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

There is nothing pop about helter skelter, Shes so heavy, benefit of mr kite or happiness is a warm gun though



Guess we all have our own conceptions of pop, but it's hard for me to think of a Beatles song (besides Revoltion no. 9) that's not pop
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
28602 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 6:35 pm to
Well if you judge pop by catchiness then the rolling stones were also pop.


I'm not saying that The Beatles weren't primarily a pop band because they were but they also did a good bit of branching out, for instance I Want You (She's So Heavy) is close to 8 minutes long. Pop isn't 8 minute long songs....
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Well if you judge pop by catchiness then the rolling stones were also pop.


I think the difference is in the vocalizations. Beatles sound more pop where as nobody would ever accuse Mick Jagger of sounding anything but raw rock and roll. Though they did do that one album.

Though I'll admit to being one who's never gotten the Beatles comparison to post 80s pop music.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 6:44 pm to
I say pop like it's a good thing. The Beatles wrote incredible pop songs. Sure, they had their sonic experimentation, but a lot of their biggest experiments were putting a pop sheen on things more fringe acts were doing. It's no accident Piper at the Gates of Dawn was recorded down the hall from Sgt. Pepper's. Compare those two psychedelic albums and its clear who is shooting for pop (not the Pink Floyd).

But that's the Beatles genius. They could make sitar music popular. They were great amalgomaters. They could turn anything into a pop hit.

The Stones had hooks, to be sure, but they weren't ever going to turn out the pop hooks of the Beatles. But the Beatles cannot rock out like the Stones (though they can rock out). Each band dominates its turf.
Posted by Clemens
Member since Feb 2008
1233 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 6:52 pm to
The Beatles were a lovey-dovey boy band until they met Bob Dylan. The maturity of their writing and depth of their lyrics grew tremendously after meeting Bob.

Just google Bob Dylan and the Beatles and there are hundreds of articles about this fateful meeting.

Also, Bob introduced the Fab Four to marijuana.
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
28602 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 7:00 pm to
I agree 100% but it also kind of irks me when people call The Beatles pop considering that most of the people out there think of pop as Britney Spears and Lady Gaga.


And I wasn't trying to call The Stones pop by any means I was just using them to make a point.


The Beatles were above and beyond anything that anyone had ever seen before them and also any thing that people will ever see after them. It was a perfect storm of a certain set of musicians in a certain time period with a certain fan base. There were better bands and musicians before them and there have been better bands and musicians after them yet no one will ever be able to come close to accomplishing what they did IMO.

If we are going to talk about the most important band in the history of music (not just rock n roll, music in general) then that honor has to go to the beatles.
Posted by Leauxgan
Brooklyn
Member since Nov 2005
17324 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 7:02 pm to
Yeah, like Baloo, for me, it's a term of endearment. I actually seek out pop. If music doesn't have a hook (my simple definition of pop) then what's the point? The Beatles had so many hooks that it hurts.
This post was edited on 12/12/11 at 7:03 pm
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
28602 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 7:10 pm to
I can enjoy a 10 minute guitar solo just as easily as a good hook but I get what you're saying and I agree
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18415 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 7:16 pm to
The Beatles and Bob Dylan were geniuses.

The Beatles didn't sing love/pop songs throughout the 60's. They had their hard rock/psychedelic years along the way. I love a band that can change it up and still sound great or perhaps even greater.

Dylan was the same way. He had his folk years, his rock years, country, gospel, blues, etc.



Bands that play the same stuff over and over fade out eventually.
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
28602 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 7:21 pm to
I agree they branched out but they always kept that beatle vibe or that dylan vibe. They never lost whatever made them great even while changing genres multiple times throughout their career
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
30369 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 7:53 pm to
Great Post!

I am loving reading everyone's opinions and ideas. I am bad about coming here with jokes and I did that a little here but this thread has greatness in it.

Thanks to everyone for giving the ideas their minds generated and making the arguments their hearts led them to make.
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
21958 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 7:57 pm to
When Muddy Waters invented electricity.
Posted by oompaw
In piney hill country...
Member since Dec 2007
6271 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 7:27 am to
Some of the Beatles' earliest influences were Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins, Chuck Berry, Little Richard, the Everly Brothers and Buddy Holly...just to name a few.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram