- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The official Interstellar thread (spoilers)
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:47 pm to UnluckyTiger
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:47 pm to UnluckyTiger
I also want to point out that the comedic relief in this movie from the walking refrigerator robots is VERY well done. His movies rarely have a lighthearted angle and I thought this one did it better than any of his others have.
2
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:50 pm to The_Joker
The one part of the film I think that's difficult to comprehend, and something they didn't really bother to explain, are the fourth and fifth dimensions. 4th dimension is pure time, but the fifth is incredibly complex. This video helps show what the fifth dimension and beyond are: LINK
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:51 pm to The_Joker
Yep just got home. Absolutely loved this movie. Brings up a ton of interesting points on society evolving to survive and just general mind frickingness. Definitely going to have to see it again to fully grasp everything.
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:53 pm to rebeloke
OP, put spoilers in the title. Nobody can read this without seeing it beforehand 
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:56 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
It doesn't say that at all. Jesus Tap Dancing Christ. Y'all look stupid saying this, since the film goes well out of its way to NOT do this. Nolan wanted to not piss off the retarded hardcore conservatives by suggesting the humans fricked up the environment. It never says that. I guarantee no less than 20 of you idiots come in here bitching about that as a point, when that's not the point of the film at all.
Preach brother!
Could not agree more
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:56 pm to PapaPogey
I really can't wait until the soundtrack for this movie is released on the 18th. The music playing while Cooper and Brand are attempting to dock above the ice planet is just epic.
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:00 am to RollTide1987
quote:yea the score was amazing. Glad zimmer did something different than his usual and relatable to old sci fi films
I really can't wait until the soundtrack for this movie is released on the 18th. The music playing while Cooper and Brand are attempting to dock above the ice planet is just epic
This post was edited on 11/7/14 at 12:01 am
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:00 am to DirtyMikeandtheBoys
quote:
Eta: frick Matt Damon
My first words walking down the steps
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:02 am to jeff5891
LINK /
This 3 part little article has helped explain a lot for me.
Edit: Here is my question as well
This 3 part little article has helped explain a lot for me.
quote:
As for how Cooper survives his time inside the Tesseract, and how he intends to reunite with Amelia? Nolan simply reapplies the same theory that has been present the entire film. Given that time moves slower near the gravity pull of the black hole, Cooper’s ejection from the Tesseract is only seconds for him, but over half a century for the rest of humanity. Keep in mind, if the ratio of time on Miller’s planet was 1 hour for every 7 years on Earth, the proportion would be skewed exponentially at the absolute center of the Tesseract singularity. As a result, while it appears to Earthbound humans that TARS and Cooper have been floating out in space for nearly ninety years, they were actually only out there for mere seconds as they perceived it.
Edit: Here is my question as well
quote:
No doubt, time-travel die-hards will debate whether the plot results in an unexplained paradox (how did future humans first survive to make a Tesseract – given that there would have been no Tesseract to save them) but Nolan leaves that particular detail up for post-viewing debate.
This post was edited on 11/7/14 at 12:04 am
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:05 am to Ancient Rome
That helps.
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:06 am to John McClane
quote:
My first words walking down the steps
Was I the only one who thought Damon was miscast? Yeah, it's cool seeing Matt Damon pop up unexpectedly, but not sure if he really fits the character of a misguided coward who is convinced he is the hero for humanity at large. It really immediately struck me watching the film that Terry O'Quinn (Locke from LOST) should have been the one cast, since he can play the cowardly, the courageous, the cocky, the wise, the optimistic, the pessimistic, and fearful man all basically within the same scene, which is what I think was required from the character.
And Marion Cotillard almost certainly should have had Anne Hathaway's role, although she certainly didn't give a bad performance.
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:07 am to Ancient Rome
This movie actually utilized eastern Kung fu principles of mind over matter.
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:07 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Terry O'Quinn (Locke from LOST)
That would have been so good.
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:09 am to RollTide1987
quote:
Yeah. There's nothing else you can say other than to tell people to go see it.
That's what I posted in my thread after I saw it last Saturday: Go see it, I recommend it.
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:11 am to OMLandshark
Cotillard would have been amazing.
O'Quinn is a good call but I felt that Damon pulled off the wormy part pretty well. He got me to hate him so he did a good job. I couldn't wait until the hatch blew
O'Quinn is a good call but I felt that Damon pulled off the wormy part pretty well. He got me to hate him so he did a good job. I couldn't wait until the hatch blew
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:13 am to John McClane
Also... The amount of time that we are talking for Hathaway's colony to develop the ability to operate in 5 dimensions has to be insanely long. Hundreds of thousands of years? Millions? Why would they care to go back? Obviously things worked out well for them. Would they even remember? Our civilization can barely keep track of what happened 4,000 years ago. More importantly, why would they set in motion an event that potentially could change the last hundred thousand years of their evolution?
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:13 am to rebeloke
Just got out the theatre
Holy shite what a ride
Did not expect the humor at all, nice way to be a "deep" movie without taking itself so serious,
Amazing, Nolan deserves tons of props
Holy shite what a ride
Did not expect the humor at all, nice way to be a "deep" movie without taking itself so serious,
Amazing, Nolan deserves tons of props
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:16 am to OMLandshark
quote:Lostssesed
Locke from LOST
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:20 am to jeff5891
Also, why did Coop send the same messages and do the exact same things he knew he would ignore? Seemed kinda odd.
There's no indication of an alternate time stream in which humanity could have survived without the wormhole, no indication of anything that could have caused the paradox, everything happens exactly the same way, time and time again.
EDIT: I can't sleep. This shite is boiling in my brain.
There's no indication of an alternate time stream in which humanity could have survived without the wormhole, no indication of anything that could have caused the paradox, everything happens exactly the same way, time and time again.
EDIT: I can't sleep. This shite is boiling in my brain.
This post was edited on 11/7/14 at 12:21 am
Posted on 11/7/14 at 12:25 am to Ancient Rome
He knew he had to for the mission. He future self told his present self about a past mission.
Page 6 of 85
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News