Started By
Message

re: Saw "Gone Girl" for the first time. I don't understand the praise.

Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:15 pm to
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

I'm sure you like some movies that I could sit here and pick apart

Pick apart? Really???

Tell me... why would the Neil Patrick Harris character take the time to clean up the kitchen floor... and then, why would he do that but leave the coffee table, etc., in shambles?

Then, why would he take the diary to Nick's father's house? Does he even KNOW Nick's father? Did he take the time inside Mrs. Dunne's house after he abducted her and cleaned the kitchen floor to ask her if she had a diary that would incriminate her husband? Did he read it? Did he then devise a plan on the fly to plant the diary at Nick's father's house? If he wanted to frame Nick for a murder, why not just leave the diary untouched inside their house?
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Oh man, the plot holes in Groundhog Day are so big I could drive a truck through them. LOL.

There are so significant plot holes in Groundhog Day.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35274 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:22 pm to
I'm not going to spend much time speaking to you, but I will answer a couple of these.
quote:

Tell me... why would the Neil Patrick Harris character take the time to clean up the kitchen floor... and then, why would he do that but leave the coffee table, etc., in shambles?
This is where you expect a real crime drama. You won't find it here. This movie is not for everyone.
quote:

Then, why would he take the diary to Nick's father's house? Does he even KNOW Nick's father? Did he take the time inside Mrs. Dunne's house after he abducted her and cleaned the kitchen floor to ask her if she had a diary that would incriminate her husband? Did he read it? Did he then devise a plan on the fly to plant the diary at Nick's father's house? If he wanted to frame Nick for a murder, why not just leave the diary untouched inside their house?
Also if you're talking about why everyone buys her story at the end, you have to buy into the fact that she had the public appearance of America's sweetheart who fought her way from the depths of hell. No I agree this would not happen IRL, but I enjoyed the rollercoaster of a story. You didn't, that's cool man.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35274 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

There are so significant plot holes in Groundhog Day.
To YOU there are not, but believe it or not Rex, there are billions of people in the world. And guess what, they ALL have opinions. But screw everyone else who doesn't share your opinion right Rex.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:27 pm to
As with Birdman I felt sucker punched by the ending, which rendered the entire previous part of the movie illegitimate.
Posted by jose canseco
Houston via Houma via BR via NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
5667 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Tell me... why would the Neil Patrick Harris character take the time to clean up the kitchen floor... and then, why would he do that but leave the coffee table, etc., in shambles?


Thought that was obvious. The plan was to frame Affleck. So they wanted a scenario where it looks like he can play off a simple abduction. meanwhile he killed her
Posted by Fenwick86
Member since May 2007
3521 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

Movies have to be good in order for me to proclaim them good.


That's a pretentious thing to say IMO. You say this as if a movie being good/bad is a black and white issue. Its not. You are obviously not an expert and don't provide any real substance to back up your claims. What you said about Boyhood was one of the dumbest things I've read on this board in some time. You are just coming here to post BS to get a rise out of people, don't pretend to be an expert and proclaim the critics and movie watching world have it all wrong. Get over yourself and watch more movies.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72129 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Movies have to be good in order for me to proclaim them good.
Well, that is obvious.



Movies also have to be good for me to proclaim them good.

My good > your good
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 1:39 pm
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:46 pm to
I enjoyed it, but man I read some thoughts on here afterwards and can't believe how much some people have hyped it up. It's practically a high-quality Lifetime movie.

Rosamund was fantastic, and I did not see the twist coming. But the last 20 minutes or so are just absurd
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 1:50 pm
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
103099 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:47 pm to
:kige:

It's like it wanted to be a satire but it wasn't funny enough for that. It had no likable characterS. Not one.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

What you said about Boyhood was one of the dumbest things I've read on this board in some time.



What I said about Boyhood is what every other of its detractors has said... the gimmick was not enough to carry a long movie without a compelling plot.

quote:

You are obviously not an expert and don't provide any real substance to back up your claims.

You mean, as in not listing some of the plot holes as I did here? Or not explaining why Boyhood and Birdman lacked appeal, as I did then?

Here's a tip for YOU: you didn't write, direct, produce, or star in any of those movies. You really have no excuse to be butt-hurt by somebody else's opinions of them.
Posted by Chef Leppard
Member since Sep 2011
11739 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

It's practically a high-quality Lifetime movie.



Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72129 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

It's practically a high-quality Lifetime movie.
EXACTLY how I saw it.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66437 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:17 pm to
For once, you're right.

Plot holes so big you could fly a 747 through em. Relies on characters being stupid to advance the plot
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43559 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:37 pm to
what I did watch of it was stupid. also the womans voice gave me a headache and made me fall asleep.
Posted by Fenwick86
Member since May 2007
3521 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

What I said about Boyhood is what every other of its detractors has said... the gimmick was not enough to carry a long movie without a compelling plot.


What "gimmick"? Explain. Whatever it is, it worked. Boyhood was an excellent movie IMO, with groundbreaking direction, really solid acting AND it was compelling even though it was just about nuances of life. It was a very difficult movie to make, one that very few directors could.

quote:

Or not explaining why Boyhood and Birdman lacked appeal, as I did then? Here's a tip for YOU: you didn't write, direct, produce, or star in any of those movies. You really have no excuse to be butt-hurt by somebody else's opinions of them.


Thanks for the non-tip. I'm not butthurt, I just think your a shitty poster on this board lately. And you are not giving your opinions, you are just trashing high profile movies and saying stupid shite to get a rise out of people while pretending have an understanding of these movies enough to be able to critique them. You don't, you clearly don't get Boyhood. Here is what you said:

quote:

Don't we all have enough boring people in our OWN lives to care about? What was the point of this non-movie? Nothing remarkable happens, which means YOU might as well invite me over to your house to watch your old home movies.


You missing the point and the fact that nothing wild or sexy happens does not mean the movie sucks or is a "non-movie". And nowhere in your post do you give your opinion, you just make dumb, snide remarks.
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 3:25 pm
Posted by 82fumanchu
Saskatchewan
Member since Jan 2014
1969 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

Crazy how astute the detective woman was and then to not DESTROY that bullshite story when she came home. It borders on insulting the audience

This. Build up of suspense and what I thought would be some huge twist/climax just to be left with a flop of an ending.
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24466 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

also the womans voice gave me a headache and made me fall asleep.



mary hart's voice gives me seizures
Posted by heatom2
At the plant, baw.
Member since Nov 2010
12810 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 6:18 pm to
I didn't really enjoy the movie at all. I was impressed with Affleck's performance though.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63548 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

Tell me... why would the Neil Patrick Harris character take the time to clean up the kitchen floor... and then, why would he do that but leave the coffee table, etc., in shambles?

Then, why would he take the diary to Nick's father's house? Does he even KNOW Nick's father? Did he take the time inside Mrs. Dunne's house after he abducted her and cleaned the kitchen floor to ask her if she had a diary that would incriminate her husband? Did he read it? Did he then devise a plan on the fly to plant the diary at Nick's father's house? If he wanted to frame Nick for a murder, why not just leave the diary untouched inside their house?



This shite is so irrelevant to the point and fun of the movie, it's absurd.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram