- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ‘Lightyear’ Same Sex Kiss Restored
Posted on 3/21/22 at 2:21 pm to Salmon
Posted on 3/21/22 at 2:21 pm to Salmon
quote:
"we will wait to watch it when no one cares and I can't score anymore virtue signaling points"
It has nothing to do with "virtue signaling." It has to do with Disney's internal metrics concerning what people are watching. I forgot that I had to be specifically clear so people who don't think before responding could not possibly misconstrue my statement.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 2:22 pm to SoonerK
quote:
You seem to have some deep repressed feelings.
Sorry I destroyed your shallow question so thoroughly. You're sure to recover soon.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 2:32 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
It has nothing to do with "virtue signaling." It has to do with Disney's internal metrics concerning what people are watching.
right
once you feel as though no one cares about your "boycott", whether it be Disney or random people on the internet, you will then consume the product
quote:
I forgot that I had to be specifically clear so people who don't think before responding could not possibly misconstrue my statement.
nobody misconstrued your statement
Posted on 3/21/22 at 2:34 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
You seem to have some deep repressed feelings.
Sorry I destroyed your shallow question so thoroughly. You're sure to recover soon.
Your reply was so baseless in reality that I knew there was no sense in replying to someone with that view.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 3:23 pm to Salmon
quote:
once you feel as though no one cares about your "boycott", whether it be Disney or random people on the internet, you will then consume the product
Again, it has nothing to do with this. And you're ignoring a key word in my statement: "Maybe." At the moment, I'm definitely not watching it. I might change my mind some point down the line, but it will definitely not be anytime soon. That was the point of my very simple statement that you are showing an inability to understand.
quote:
nobody misconstrued your statement
I mean, you even ignored the word "Maybe" in the statement (which you had to do for your point to make sense). I'm not sure you could have done a worse job misconstruing what I said if you tried.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 3/21/22 at 3:23 pm to SoonerK
quote:
Your reply was so baseless in reality that I knew there was no sense in replying to someone with that view.
And yours lacked any rebuttal, just an attempted smear. Almost as if you had no retort.
Which you did again in this post.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 3:34 pm to Salmon
quote:
once you feel as though no one cares about your "boycott", whether it be Disney or random people on the internet, you will then consume the product
Don’t forget he’ll be paying for Disney+ the whole time. No principles.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 3:40 pm to Esquire
quote:
Don’t forget he’ll be paying for Disney+ the whole time. No principles.
At no point have I stated I would be boycotting Disney. You guys can't refute anything I'm saying, so you're trying to change what I've said to be something I never said. It's a pathetic tactic.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 3/21/22 at 3:41 pm to Philzilla2k
quote:
Your reply was so baseless in reality that I knew there was no sense in replying to someone with that view.
And yours lacked any rebuttal, just an attempted smear. Almost as if you had no retort.
Which you did again in this post.
So his rebuttal was that everyone is straight unless they choose to be gay. So in his theory, every single person could choose to be gay. Does that sound like a fundamentally sound rebuttal?
Posted on 3/21/22 at 3:43 pm to SoonerK
quote:
So his rebuttal was that everyone is straight unless they choose to be gay. So in his theory, every single person could choose to be gay. Does that sound like a fundamentally sound rebuttal?
There is no evidence, of any sort, that supports the idea that people are "born that way," so yes that is a sound rebuttal. People choose this behavior.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 3:48 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
There is no evidence, of any sort, that supports the idea that people are "born that way," so yes that is a sound rebuttal. People choose this behavior.
Going by your belief. You could wake up tomorrow and choose to be gay and be physically attracted to men.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 4:01 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
At no point have I stated I would be boycotting Disney.
Because you have no principles. You just like to hear yourself complain.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 4:02 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:You obviously don't have any gay friends (that you know of).
There is no evidence, of any sort, that supports the idea that people are "born that way,"
Posted on 3/21/22 at 4:09 pm to SoonerK
quote:
Going by your belief. You could wake up tomorrow and choose to be gay and be physically attracted to men.
I'm not sure what to tell you man. Scientists have been looking for a "gay gene" since the 1980s. At this point they've all but confirmed that it simply doesn't exist. People choose to be that way.
Here's an article from someone who clearly hates people who think like me, but she goes through a quick history of the search for the "gay gene."
Here's the TLDR:
quote:
Most recently in 2019, the largest ever study of its kind examined data and DNA information of 500,000 people and found there were thousands of genetic variants linked to same-sex sexual behaviour, most of the them having a minor impact. There is no “gay gene” as such, but many different mutations might play a small role — yet the researchers said that non-genetic factors, including upbringing, personality and nurture, had far more influence on a person’s choice of sexual partner.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 3/21/22 at 4:12 pm to Esquire
quote:
Because you have no principles. You just like to hear yourself complain.
I believe the only way they're going to change things like this is for people who do consume their products not to consume the specific products they disagree with. If only people who want to view vile things are consuming Disney products, then Disney will continue to put out products with vile things in them.
You are free to hold a more simplistic view of the world if you wish.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 4:15 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Going by your belief. You could wake up tomorrow and choose to be gay and be physically attracted to men.
I'm not sure what to tell you man. Scientists have been looking for a "gay gene" since the 1980s. At this point they've all but confirmed that it simply doesn't exist. People choose to be that way.
So you agree that you yourself could choose to wake up tomorrow to be gay and be sexually attracted to men. Is that correct?
Posted on 3/21/22 at 4:17 pm to SoonerK
quote:
So you agree that you yourself could choose to wake up tomorrow to be gay and be sexually attracted to men. Is that correct?
Well, he'd have to have great tits. And a vagina would certainly help.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 4:18 pm to SoonerK
quote:
So you agree that you yourself could choose to wake up tomorrow to be gay and be sexually attracted to men. Is that correct?
I would never make such a decision, but yes anyone could make the same choices any other person who chose that path made.
ETA: Anyone can choose to make bad decisions at any time. The fact that most people wouldn't make those decisions doesn't make them less of a choice.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 3/21/22 at 4:36 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
I believe the only way they're going to change things like this is for people who do consume their products not to consume the specific products they disagree with.
You and your Disney+ subscription support those “vile” things, whether you watch it or not.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 4:38 pm to Esquire
quote:
You and your Disney+ subscription support those “vile” things, whether you watch it or not.
This is true, but if they want to stay in business they won't keep putting out products that people don't watch. If it gets to the point that this sort of material is all they're putting out, I'll cancel the subscription. At this point, that is not the situation we're in.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News