Started By
Message

re: House of Cards Discussion and Spoiler Party

Posted on 3/9/16 at 8:54 am to
Posted by LordSnow
Your Mom's House
Member since May 2011
5508 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 8:54 am to
How creepy was the scene in the kitchen after Yates spent the night. Awkward coffee.
Posted by STCTiger985
NOLA
Member since Mar 2015
345 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 9:45 am to
Favorite Moment: Scene with Frank and Durant in the Oval Office where he tells her everything he's done then just laughs it off

Least Favorite Moment: Claire always with other guys.. guess its part of their marriage.

Probably my second favorite season behind season 1

1>4>2>>>>>>>>>3
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36610 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 9:49 am to
quote:

The gun control BS is unnecessary. Two straight out lies Claire push when talking about purchasing guns. 1. The gun show loophole, which has been proven doesn't exist and 2. That you can just purchase a gun off the internet with no background check and have it shipped to your door. Than villainies the NRA and have the Republican nominee not like guns but "can't say that" as his wife put it to Claire.


The best part about the whole gun control stuff is they repeatedly say Lucas purchased the gun illegally.

So even with their bill, he still would have been shot.
Posted by STCTiger985
NOLA
Member since Mar 2015
345 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Threechum
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 11:18 am to
quote:

The show isn't as good when Frank isn't the focal point and/or isn't out-manuevring everyone just imho


You do realize that at some point this was going to end. While I like Frank. He can't out-maneuver everyone in his path. That would get stale very quickly.
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Me too. He should have been the one to bring it all down on Frank by exposing him with the story...not going nuts and shooting the president
quote:

I'm not. Lucas annoyed me the entire time.

Lucas couldn't be the one to bring down Frank because he was so close to Zoe imo.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

How creepy was the scene in the kitchen after Yates spent the night. Awkward coffee.
That was about the 9th time in the series I simply looked up and said, "my God, these people are freaks."

And I meant that in the classic "circus freak" way, not the modern sexual way, though that obviously qualifies as well.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36610 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

You do realize that at some point this was going to end. While I like Frank. He can't out-maneuver everyone in his path. That would get stale very quickly


I rather him out-maneuver people then be forced to believe that Claire could be VP.

I think the show could have achieved the same thing (making it clear that Claire is alpha of the relationship) without making the VP or running in Texas stories. It is just so unrealistic. No one would ever go for that.

edit: I know the show has already gone full fantasy some time ago.
This post was edited on 3/9/16 at 12:36 pm
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

You do realize that at some point this was going to end. While I like Frank. He can't out-maneuver everyone in his path. That would get stale very quickly.
I'll jump in here and say I agree with you. I'd further say that not only is he no longer outmaneuvering anyone, he fricking sucks at his job as president and seems to garner little in the way of respect from almost everyone he encounters. That's all fine. The point is he keeps stepping in shite and has a list of enemies that stretches from the Potomac to LA to Beijing and Moscow. How is he still standing? It's dragged on long enough.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 2:18 pm to
Someone refresh my memory. Was the last scene of the last episode the first time time anyone besides Frank broke the 4th wall?
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Someone refresh my memory. Was the last scene of the last episode the first time time anyone besides Frank broke the 4th wall?
You mean with Claire coming in on it?

To my knowledge, yes. I believe he's the only one to ever break the 4th wall. I guess it just confirms what the writers spent the season driving home: they are co-protagonists. She's no longer a supporting character.

Shame, too. He was much more interesting and even relatable than she is.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112314 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 2:41 pm to
this season was balls to the walls awesome, especiially the second half

i was an opposed to the VP claire stuff as possible but it actually lead to more Season 1 level manuevering so it worked out great.

The freddy stuff makes perfect sense for anybody who remembers the second season. That was always a one sided friendship

from the looks of it though they literally couldve skipped the entire season 3 and been at the same place. I cant think of any storylines that really build off of season 3 besides the first two episodes dealing with Claires hissy fit.



Also i feel the need to say that Thomas Yates might be the most irrelevant person to ever appear in a TV drama to get as much scene time as he did. I cant figure out what the hell is the point of his presence besides spouting off pretentious garbage about love
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Also i feel the need to say that Thomas Yates might be the most irrelevant person to ever appear in a TV drama to get as much scene time as he did. I cant figure out what the hell is the point of his presence besides spouting off pretentious garbage about love


I don't like Tom but I think I "get" him as a device. He's supposed to humanize the Underwoods--especially Claire, I suppose. They're supposed to be able to be open with him and gain some deeper insight or some shite. The way Claire's mother took to him was supposed to mean something about Claire as well, I'm sure.

This season was better than the last, but I feel like they're jumping the shark in slow-motion--as much as that's possible for a show like this.

And I feel like they're drawing it out. It could have been a three season show and been much better.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36610 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

How is he still standing? It's dragged on long enough.


I guess the rest of the government is just really incompetent

quote:

And I feel like they're drawing it out. It could have been a three season show and been much better.


American shows need to take notes from the BBC and not Showtime

This post was edited on 3/9/16 at 3:10 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112314 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 3:08 pm to
Weve seen them "humanized" before those in more effective ways. They are just lying to us at that point. we know they are dead cold people to the core, just because they become nicer after they get a little dick doesnt mean they are something deeper than that
Posted by CaptSpaulding
Member since Feb 2012
6503 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

I cant think of any storylines that really build off of season 3 besides the first two episodes dealing with Claires hissy fit.


1. The game catching up with Frank, as he turns out to not be the president he thought he could be.

2. Claire realizes this and takes her first steps towards her own political career, independent of Frank.

3. Frank manages to turn Jackie and Remy against him. One supports the person running against him for the nomination, the other resigns from his staff. They both team up this season and pose the greatest threat to Frank that we have seen.

I was not a fan of last season when it first came out, but after this season I see it differently. Before the 2008 writers strike, most seasons of a tv show would be 24-26 episodes. The strike caused all of the prime time shows to stop mid fall 2007, and pick up mid spring 2008. Many shows suffered from this story wise (Lost and Friday Night Lights for example), but it started the trend that we have now of shorter (13 episode) seasons, or 16 episode seasons broken in half by a mid season break. Studios and creators do that now so they can milk one season of a show for 2 years of award nominations.

All that to say, I now view HOC as a two season show, with seasons 1-2 and 3-4 combined. Seasons 2 and 4 end on much not definite notes than 1 and 3. I guarantee if you binged seasons 3 and 4 together, the faults that everyone perceives will not be nearly as glaring, because it's easier to connect the dots of the story without taking a year long break halfway through.
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

I think the show could have achieved the same thing (making it clear that Claire is alpha of the relationship) without making the VP or running in Texas stories. It is just so unrealistic. No one would ever go for that.

I don't think anything is unrealistic in American politics anymore...

Posted by TheBadgerOfHoney
Member since Nov 2011
1849 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 4:48 pm to
Yates was a little better this season than season 3 but not one of my favorites.

When is Frank gonna get a hot female side piece to be his Yates? ETA: I wouldn't mind some LeAnn scenes
This post was edited on 3/9/16 at 4:49 pm
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46486 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 6:56 pm to
Frank is gay so... doubtful on that end
Posted by TheBadgerOfHoney
Member since Nov 2011
1849 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 11:56 pm to
He's bisexual

Exhibit A: Zoe
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram