Started By
Message

re: Greatest non-fictional villain in film?

Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:55 am to
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
18963 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:55 am to
Chong Li
Posted by ElJefe686
Houston
Member since Nov 2012
794 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:55 am to
He's certainly not portraying the worst person, but enjoy immensely Edward the Longshanks from Braveheart.
Posted by Tackle74
Columbia, MO
Member since Mar 2012
5260 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Edward 1 is a good one.

Commodus, though it's not an accurate story.


Either is Edward I in Braveheart, the guy was a great king, I enjoy Braveheart but the story is pretty much about as much Hollywood bullshite as is possible.
Posted by Tackle74
Columbia, MO
Member since Mar 2012
5260 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Malcolm X


Villains not Heroes, Troll
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29393 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Not really a villain, but Herbert Sobel from Band of Brothers.


Have you read the Ambrose book?

While it's true that Easy hated Sobel, and he was not a combat leader, most of the guys acknowledged that he was responsible for the tight knit and superb fitness and training they had. Sure Ross plays the role as an a-hole, but I'd hardly call him a villain.

Not to hijack, but something I always loved from the book that wasn't really discussed in the series was when Easy gets to England, their instructors stopped leading PT runs with the company because they were in insanely better shape than any of their instructors and none could keep up.
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
77991 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Forrest Whitaker's Idi Amin from Last King of Scotland should be in this discussion, too. He earned every bit of that Oscar.



I was uncomfortable as hell through that whole movie because of his performance.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89552 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

I was uncomfortable as hell through that whole movie because of his performance.


He's such an intense actor - when he wants to be - if you watch his guest role in The Shield (as IAD Lieutenant Cavanaugh) - where he is like Captain Ahab hunting the Strike Team, or even in a single scene like in The Color of Money - he brought an intensity to a bit part (much as his younger self did in Fast Times) that was incredible.

Then you have his comedic role in Good Morning Vietnam - now, for whatever reason, everybody brought their "A" game, whoever cast that one should have gotten some awards. Why he didn't get more work is beyond me.

(Bird is another one - I don't care for the film, but Whitaker is amazing in it.)

But, Last King of Scotland is the one for which he'll be remembered.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33943 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Malcolm X


This topic is about villains not heroes, breh.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56371 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

the guy was a great king
I wouldn't say that, but while there is a lot of understandable dramatic license bullshite in that movie, it's not the wild departure from reality that's in Gladiator.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65121 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 1:52 pm to
Edward I was an above average king though. There is no question or doubt about that. Did he do some shitty things? Yeah. But even the greatest kings from that era did some questionable deeds.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35278 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

Either is Edward I in Braveheart, the guy was a great king, I enjoy Braveheart but the story is pretty much about as much Hollywood bullshite as is possible.
A villain is not always pure evil.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56371 posts
Posted on 5/13/15 at 2:03 pm to
I'd say he was a competent leader, but he did kick all of the Jews out of England and though some may boyishly admire his ruthless, strong-arm attitude toward dissent within Britain, it did lead not only to his short term military failure, but created a sense of disunity and resentment for centuries to come.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram