Started By
Message

re: Would you have allowed Rory's group to play up...?

Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:49 am to
Posted by theBeard
Member since Jul 2011
6739 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:49 am to
I would have let them tee off, then make them wait.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:52 am to
Which sounds like what they intended to do without the interference of the pga officials.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:53 am to
They should have all teed off before Phil/rickie left the tee box

That's part of what made it a clusterfrick
Posted by jobbieman
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
384 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:53 am to
No. I would not have let them hit their tee shots. This was poorly handled by the PGA, and in my opinion it served as a major distraction to Phil and Ricky. It appeared to me that the PGA was more concerned about completing the tournament on Sunday to satisfy CBS. As far as I'm concerned it was total BS.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84063 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Phil acted like a little bitch. He was down 2 going into the easiest hole on the course and knew he wasn't going to win it.


The frick is this? Phil was within 3 feet of sending it to a playoff.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:59 am to
Exactly. And rory was 3 feet away from hitting it in the water. Rory was in a great position, but the tournament wasn't over. Phil, Rickie and Rory knew that.
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Would have let them hit the tee shot. But not play up with us
Posted by RGJ18
Collierville, TN
Member since Feb 2010
8670 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:53 am to
Yes, I would have.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42392 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:00 am to
Either all the contenders are allowed to finish or they should have come back the next day for hole 18. If they were going to let the others complete it they needed to do the same for the last group.
They all had their chance to win it.
Posted by Noplacelikehome
Member since Oct 2010
2154 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:22 am to
The PGA made a huge mistake by not pushing up all tee times in the morning. On Saturday they knew that they were in serious danger of bad weather and of not finishing the round on Sunday. They should have taken preventative measures... All they needed to do was push up all the tee times an hour or so.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61764 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:24 am to
I think some of the complaints I heard last night on TGC were misguided. They were saying, "We have never seen 4 players play up on the same hole at the same time to complete a major." Okay smart guys, please let me know when a major has ever been suspended on Sunday night to wait for exactly 1 grouping to play one hole? We all would have been complaining about the unfairness of Rory having to sleep over night to wait on one hole. Rickie and Phil would have had to show back up this morning hoping for a playoff while watching Rory hit irons all the way down the 18th hole to fiddle fart his way to a par.

Rory would never bogey that hole if he isn't rushing to the green. He played the short par 5 at -4 in the first three days. In fact, him rushing to finish almost caused him to bogey, so it worked in Phil and Rickie's favor. Phil and Rickie were not affected. No one has argued about the tee shot being hit, the controversey is on the second shot. Phil and Rickie have said that you hope to make eagle and put pressure on Rory. Well both of their second shots were already played before Rory hit his second shot. He knew that Phil had missed the green and Rickie was on the bottom shelf. Those facts were not going to change no matter when Rory hit. I think that Phil and Rickie were not rushed at all to hit their eagle attempts. They knew they needed eagle and the tournament would be won or lost with those shots. As it played out, with Rory rushing to finish, he had a higher chance of bogeying the hole by playing in the dark.

I do feel that Rickie missed his birdie putt because he probably felt rushed, but that didn't change the winner, it only cost Rickie a T2 instead of a 3rd place finish. I feel bad for Rickie for that, but I haven't heard anyone complain about that.

The entire scenario was unprecedented. As I said before, we have never seen a major completed on Monday by 1 player (basically, because Cheeseburger was out of it) to play 1 hole.
Posted by unbeWEAVEable
The Golf Board Godfather
Member since Apr 2010
13637 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:25 am to
I would like to think I would have, but idk.

Their drive? Sure. That's not unheard of. Even in a major, that's not that big of a deal IMO.

Approach? That's a different story. Phil or Rickie make eagle, or even birdie, and now you've got pressure applied.

I would have probably let them hit their drive, but not an approach.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:27 am to
whats crazy is that rory hit 3 pretty poor shots before his 2-putt par

and with phil so close to holing his chip, this could have turned out way differently
Posted by Ford Frenzy
337 posts
Member since Aug 2010
6876 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:31 am to
I would have made them wait, and hoped they forced the finish in the dark and made bogey.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61764 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Phil or Rickie make eagle, or even birdie


They both had a chance to stuff it in close on their approach before Rory hit. Neither did. The pressure from birdie would have already been on Rory because he saw their second shots, and had to assume that at worst both Phil and Rickie would make birdie from where they were laying after 2 shots.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27465 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Either all the contenders are allowed to finish or they should have come back the next day for hole 18. If they were going to let the others complete it they needed to do the same for the last group.
that's exactly why Rory wanted to tee off on 18. Once the horn is blown, the player has the option of finishing the hole that day, or the next. So, Rory teeing off was all that was needed to give him and his playing partner the option of finishing the hole. It was a courtesy so that he had the decision.

Making Rickie and Phil wait for the 2nd shot was a bad call by the PGA officials. They should've let Phil and Rickie decide among themselves. Chances are, it doesn't matter anyway. But, who knows.

Rory was a few feet from hitting his driver in the water and making things interesting. And, Phil was a foot or so from dropping the eagle chip to tie things. The only issue here is that the officials made the call and didn't let Phil and Rickie make the call.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61764 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:52 am to
I think when Rory sank the birdie on 17 and took a two stroke lead, that the tournament had been won. I know that strange things can happen on the last hole of a major, but their was only about a 5% chance of Rory not winning in regulation after the he left the 17th green. Had the lead only have been one, or had their been a tie, I wonder what would have happened. I bet Rory may have waited until Monday morning, and perhaps Rickie and Phil would have done the same.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27465 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:57 am to
quote:

I think when Rory sank the birdie on 17 and took a two stroke lead, that the tournament had been won.
He was a bad bounce from being in the water off the tee. It was far from over. That said, he overcame 3 mediocre shots on 18 and 2 putted to win, in the dark. Congrats to him. And, I don't think Phil hits a better chip if he gets to hit it 7 minutes earlier.

But, the tournament was far from over. Rory's tee shot and/or Phil's chip could've gone the other way easily and then they are playing golf today.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61764 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 11:10 am to
quote:

He was a bad bounce from being in the water off the tee


Because he was rushing to finish. As I stated earlier, I think the rush to finish benefitted Rickie and Phil, not Rory.

quote:

And, I don't think Phil hits a better chip if he gets to hit it 7 minutes earlier.


That's kind of my point. I think Phil and Rickie actually had to wait about 1, 2 minutes at most. They walked up to their balls, were told that Rory was hitting, then watched him hit. They still had full focus on their eagle attempts, actually even having more confidence that an eagle would put them in a playoff.
Posted by Noplacelikehome
Member since Oct 2010
2154 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 11:12 am to
quote:

I do feel that Rickie missed his birdie putt because he probably felt rushed, but that didn't change the winner, it only cost Rickie a T2 instead of a 3rd place finish. I feel bad for Rickie for that, but I haven't heard anyone complain about that.


Only cost him $300,000-$400,000 haha.

They all got to finish on a pretty even playing field. The final 2 groups had been on tee boxes for most of the day waiting for the groups in front of them. The only person who didn't play the hole well (since Rickie should have made that birdie putt) was McIlroy. The odds of any of them making an eagle were very slim no matter what because the course was so saturated. There were only 3 eagles the last two days on 18.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram