Started By
Message

Will missing out again force the Big 12 to add teams?

Posted on 10/22/15 at 6:26 am
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
10890 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 6:26 am
If Baylor loses there's a decent chance the big 12 champ will miss the playoffs again. Heck, even if Baylor runs the table...

If it was Texas and OU in Baylor and TCU's shoes the conference would've already expanded after getting snubbed last year.. and added a championship game.

One of the obvious choices? BYU. They have some national pull, their network is floundering. The other could be Memphis.
Posted by The Easter Bunny
Minnesota
Member since Jan 2005
45566 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 6:39 am to
1. Baylor is being ranked in the top 4 by basically everyone right now so them being left out after going undefeated seems unlikely. The ACC or Pac12 champ is much more likely to miss out and they both play a CG.

2. So you think if the committee could rationalize jumping a team over an undefeated Baylor, somehow them beating Memphis would mean they would not get jumped?

3. A 4 team playoff guarantees at least one major champ will always be left out, so adding a championship game is not a fail safe answer
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
12741 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 6:39 am to
I think they are hoping for the P5 to deregulate conference championship games sooner rather than later.

That way they can have a championship game without having to ad schools. The downside to that is if they still play round robin, the CG would always be a rematch.
Posted by TexasTiger1185
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
13070 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 6:40 am to
I honestly think if they just had a championship game they'd be much more respected.

You can still have that with 10 teams.


I also think they should expand, but having Utah and West Virginia in the same conference is a long way.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18981 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 6:49 am to
quote:

If it was Texas and OU in Baylor and TCU's shoes the conference would've already expanded after getting snubbed last year.. and added a championship game.


if it was Texas or OU they wouldn't have gotten snubbed. Its also hilarious that people criticize the round robin schedule which is superior in every way except TV money than the 2 division system
This post was edited on 10/22/15 at 6:51 am
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9235 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 7:04 am to
If they add two schools it should be BYU and Cincinnati. If they decided to add 4 it sould be BYU, Cincinnati, Colorado State and Houston.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71071 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 7:09 am to
quote:

Its also hilarious that people criticize the round robin schedule which is superior in every way except TV money than the 2 division system


Without a conference championship game, the Big 12 is sitting at home watching everyone else play top competition at some point in the season. That's a significant advantage. What's even worse is when they're playing teams like Iowa State or Kansas in December, then pretending that blowing those teams out is somehow impressive. That's something they should be doing in September, not December.

The Big 12 deserves to be left out every year if it's even questionable that they aren't top four, and I don't care if that's Baylor or Oklahoma. No conference championship game is a huge deal in this system, and they better get on board with that.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162194 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 7:18 am to
quote:

1. Baylor is being ranked in the top 4 by basically everyone right now so them being left out after going undefeated seems unlikely.

Especially since they have to go through TCU in the regular season to run the table
Posted by double d
Amarillo by morning
Member since Jun 2004
16403 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 7:24 am to
quote:

I honestly think if they just had a championship game they'd be much more respected.


What value would a championship game be when the conference plays round robin where everyone plays every team in the conference. Imagine the shite storm if an Undefeated team has to play a two loss team in the CCG and loses. You are left out for sure then.

The perfect system is where everyone in a conference plays each other but with the size of the other conferences it doesn't work.
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6364 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 7:29 am to
quote:

if it was Texas or OU they wouldn't have gotten snubbed.


I agree with you in part. They would have had a much stronger chance of getting last year. Part of the problem the Big12 had, in my opinion, was that in the final weeks of the season TCU looked to be their best bet at getting in so the balked at the idea of naming Baylor champion.

I don't think Baylor ends up getting in anyway, but I do think that played a role.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41158 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 7:52 am to
A knee jerk reaction of adding sub-par teams will hurt the Big 12 in the long run. If Baylor doesn't want to be left out of the playoffs, play a non conference team with a pulse. They have no one to blame but themselves.

Baylor's OOC schedule last 3 years:
Woffard, UL-Monroe, Buffalo
SMU, Northwestern Louisiana, Buffalo
SMU, Lamar,Rice
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71071 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Imagine the shite storm if an Undefeated team has to play a two loss team in the CCG and loses. You are left out for sure then.


They should be left out in that case.

The perfect system includes a conference championship game...always.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41158 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:23 am to
quote:

I honestly think if they just had a championship game they'd be much more respected.

You can still have that with 10 teams.


The NCAA says you can't have a championship game with less than 12 in your conference
Posted by blueboxer1119
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
7969 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:30 am to
quote:

The perfect system includes a conference championship game...always.


I agree. It's ridiculous some teams have an extra "must win" game against a good team and others don't. Until they do, they should be overlooked when choosing playoff teams.

Not only do teams have to win the conf. champ game, they get injuries, etc.

*that's why Alabama going to the NC a few years ago was ridiculous. I'm 100% LSU fan and I'll be the first to admit Bama prob had a better team that year.

HOWEVER, if you don't play in and win conf championship game, you shouldn't go. Bama got a nice long rest while we had to go to battle with a good team on a neutral field. Grade A bologna.
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6364 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 9:09 am to
quote:

Bama got a nice long rest while we had to go to battle with a good team on a neutral field.


That "nice long rest" was only a week longer than LSU's.

I have no problem with conference championships playing a role in the playoff, but as long as there is a selection process, it's stupid to penalize teams for not getting to play one. I wouldn't necessarily penalize a team for losing that extra game either. That's the whole point, theoretically, of the committee. To evaluate the teams without the "bias."

People look at it as other conferences "having" to play an extra game. Well, the Big12 can't play one.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145075 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 9:11 am to
quote:

If Baylor doesn't want to be left out of the playoffs, play a non conference team with a pulse. They have no one to blame but themselves.

Baylor's OOC schedule last 3 years:
Woffard, UL-Monroe, Buffalo
SMU, Northwestern Louisiana, Buffalo
SMU, Lamar,Rice
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
21953 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 9:16 am to
A simple "quick fix" is to have five playoff teams, and have No. 4 and No. 5 do a play-in game at No. 4's home field. This ensures that the committee can place a team from each of the power 5 conferences if it chooses to.

Of course, we can expand to 6 or more teams in the playoffs, but if they really wanted to keep it small but fair, five teams would work.

Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42557 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 9:20 am to
Laugh at me. But I would go for BYU and UAB. UAB sits in the middle of the top rated college football viewership market. So the exposure for the league would be there.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145075 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 9:21 am to
UCF would be a frick ton of a better add then UAB
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83927 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Laugh at me. But I would go for BYU and UAB. UAB sits in the middle of the top rated college football viewership market. So the exposure for the league would be there.



UAB? Seriously? They would do better getting South Alabama.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram