- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which NBA Franchise without a title will win one first?
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:46 am to BobCoot
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:46 am to BobCoot
quote:
the NBA has no parity
As of the current set up, you can pretty much say that the NBA champion will come from one of three teams. Whoever LeBron plays for, the Warriors, or Spurs. I don't see that changing soon without major free agent shifts.
1
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:46 am to okietiger
You'd have to pick a team that is just now beginning to put some pieces together, because the window for a newcomer to win one won't be open for at least 3 more years.
I think Minnesota is interesting given how young Wiggins and KAT are, both 21 and years away from their prime. I'd go with them.
I think Minnesota is interesting given how young Wiggins and KAT are, both 21 and years away from their prime. I'd go with them.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:46 am to ctiger69
The Pelicans can of Hield becomes a superstar and the team can get good pieces. They have their star. They made some games with the Warriors a couple years ago in the 1st rd. They have to build an antithesis team to the Warriors. They are super young but so is GS.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:49 am to Bankshot
quote:
I don't see that changing soon without major free agent shifts.
You might want to a take a look at who's hitting free agency this summer
It's a massive list of elite players.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:53 am to okietiger
Clippers are the only team of those with even a slight chance to win one in the next say 5 years.
This post was edited on 2/15/17 at 10:53 am
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:01 am to okietiger
To be clear i don't think any of these teams have a strong chance in at least the next 5-10.
Indiana has a strong front office in a basketball hungry market. They do a great job of evaluating talent in the draft and building a roster of middle market free agents that can be contributors. I can see them being a contender 10-15 years from today based on the organizational track record.
Indiana has a strong front office in a basketball hungry market. They do a great job of evaluating talent in the draft and building a roster of middle market free agents that can be contributors. I can see them being a contender 10-15 years from today based on the organizational track record.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:03 am to VinegarStrokes
quote:
Need to add Atlanta to the mix.
Just for the LULZ I would like to see them make the Finals, get a 3-0 lead, then lose it....
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:04 am to okietiger
quote:is the owner of the title that seattle won in 79
3.) OKC Thunder
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:21 am to BobCoot
quote:
Damn the NBA has no parity
I didn't realize so many teams hadn't won it.
It's been a while since I've checked. But I think by 2008 or so the Lakers and Celtics had won roughly half of all the titles.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:25 am to theGarnetWay
lakers and celtics had exactly half after the completion of the 2013 season
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:25 am to BobCoot
quote:
Damn the NBA has no parity
Its obviously outdated but it gets the point across. Before Cleveland and Golden State, their was even less parity.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:18 pm to Socratics
Damn Texas has had a lot of championships as has Cali.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:19 pm to Socratics
You could argue parity has increased over past 10+ years though:
Golden State wins 1st time in ages
Cleveland wins 1st
Miami wins 1st time (wins twice more so possibly hurts argument)
Dallas wins 1st
Boston wins 1st in ages
Golden State wins 1st time in ages
Cleveland wins 1st
Miami wins 1st time (wins twice more so possibly hurts argument)
Dallas wins 1st
Boston wins 1st in ages
This post was edited on 2/15/17 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:22 pm to Socratics
quote:and not 100% accurate
Its obviously outdated
its missing the title that detroit won in 1990
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:25 pm to okietiger
Clippers aren't winning anytime soon
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:40 pm to TigahJay
If they were healthy last year they could've won it. All it takes is for them to be healthy and GSW to have a key injury. they are a team who at full strength can beat any of the other teams besides GSW.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:42 pm to VinegarStrokes
quote:
Need to add Atlanta to the mix. No one in Atlanta cares.
FTFY
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:46 pm to okietiger
quote:
Because from ownership standpoint the 3 teams I listed are damn strong and willing to spend money.
quote:
3.) OKC Thunder
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:51 pm to TH03
quote:
quote:
Need to add Atlanta to the mix. No one in Atlanta cares.
FTFY
That's not true. Lil' Jon cares when he can get visibility for caring.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 12:52 pm to floridatigah
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News