Started By
Message

re: Peyton Manning = tGOAT - Is it settled now?

Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:29 pm to
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

Peyton Manning = tGOAT - Is it settled now?



Not for me. I have him #2 or #3, but my opinion is largely irrelevant.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110924 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

Manning couldn't hold up Elway's fricking jock

Troll post?
Posted by BhamDore
Nashville
Member since Aug 2009
6289 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:31 pm to
In Tom's 1st two Superbowl seasons he had a 86.5 & 85.9 passer rating. It's amazing how people have rewritten history to make Tom more than what he is. Since New England has become an offensive team and Tom Brady has been the "guy" He is 1-2 in Superbowls and has a slightly above .500 playoff record.

It's okay for people to say the like Brady better for whatever reason, but in no realm of reality was he a better QB than Peyton in his prime.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65130 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:31 pm to
It's an irrelevant stat. And after tonight, Manning's career playoff passer rating might drop BELOW Tom Brady's. Before the game Manning was sitting at 88.1 and Brady was sitting at 88.0. Manning scored a 56.6 rating this evening.

Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89552 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

hes not even top three..


...of quarterbacks who played most or all of 2015.

He may not be tGOAT Manning. Think about that.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110924 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

It's an irrelevant stat. And after tonight, Manning's career playoff passer rating might drop BELOW Tom Brady's. Before the game Manning was sitting at 88.1 and Brady was sitting at 88.0. Manning scored a 56.6 rating this evening.

Of course it's irrelevant when compared to a player with 1 or 2 career playoff games, but that' isn't at all what you said. Had you said that, I would agree.

You said players play better games in their 1st playoff games, then magically get worse and the QB ratings go from high to lower. There is no basis for that, unless you have a link to some numbers on it.
Posted by VOLhalla
Knoxville
Member since Feb 2011
4440 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:33 pm to
quote:


Peyton Manning has 5 MVPs. He was the best player of his generation and changed the way the position is played. He holds all the important records for his said position and as done it with multiple coaching staffs. 5 MVPs means he was almost the MVP for 1 out of every 3 season he was healthy.

How this is even a discussion is mind boggling.


THIS
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Trent Dilfer road his defense to a Super Bowl championship in 2000. Peyton Manning did the same in 2015. I was simply replying to your insinuation that this accomplishment is somehow unique.

Is this really the argument you want to go with AGAINST Manning? Really?
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45794 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

Alex Smith has a better playoff passer rating than Brady and Manning both. The same thing goes for Mark Sanchez. The stat is irrelevant.
Just because it doesn't support your argument doesn't mean it's irrelevant
Posted by El Magnifico
La casa de tu mamá
Member since Jan 2014
7017 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:36 pm to
I'd take Elway over Manning in any big game
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162231 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:37 pm to
He's doing a poor job of making his point but be does have a point. Sample sizes matters. If someone has only played in 3 playoff games one spectacular game or one terrible game could skew the ratings. If you play in 20+ playoff games then you're likely to get a more average looking outcome.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81890 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:37 pm to
Insane Brady so much better
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

FWIW, the notion that your QB rating goes down the more games you play, there's no basis for it.
Up or down, it will most left approximate to a more reasonable rating, given the QB.

Just like Kershaw will probably have a better winning percentage after he gets a larger sample of playoff games, given his talent.

BUT regardless, rolltide is doing a poor job arguing.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110924 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

He's doing a poor job of making his point but be does have a point. Sample sizes matters. If someone has only played in 3 playoff games one spectacular game or one terrible game could skew the ratings. If you play in 20+ playoff games then you're likely to get a more average looking outcome.

Yea, I did agree when he clarified the 2nd time around that sample size was his main point.

But his idea that QBs play their best games first then gradually get worse, I'm pretty sure there's no actual basis for that, he just said his thought incorrectly.
Posted by AlabamaAlum07
Member since Jun 2014
2027 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:39 pm to
Can't put him ahead of Montana and Brady.
Posted by Street Hawk
Member since Nov 2014
3461 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

So having his team's defense pretty much win the super bowl helps make him the goat?

Without Manning bringing the Broncos back when they were struggling against the Chargers in the regular season, they were in danger of missing the playoffs completely. Without Manning this team is most probably not playing in SB 50.

Edited: to correct mistake.
This post was edited on 2/7/16 at 11:23 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89552 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

I'd take Elway over Manning in any big game


I'd take:

Unitas

Bradshaw

Elway

Montana

Young

Brady

Rogers

Brees

- over Manning in a big game. He was a gaudy stat machine in his prime, but never gave the impression he could elevate the team when they really needed it.

ETA: And Rothlisberger

(Manning is the Dan Marino of his era, but was fortunate enough to get a couple of SB wins - it is what it is.)
This post was edited on 2/7/16 at 10:47 pm
Posted by AlabamaAlum07
Member since Jun 2014
2027 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:45 pm to
Peyton didn't even play against the Patriots in the regular season.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110924 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

Without Manning bringing the Broncos from 14 points down against the Pats in the regular season
Uhh, that was Osweiler.

ETA: Poster above beat me to it.
This post was edited on 2/7/16 at 10:47 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110924 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:47 pm to
1 game for your life, and you're taking all those guys in their prime over a prime Manning?

Yikes
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram