re: PAC-10 SOS's;

Schedules aside, Washington and Washington State are two of the worst teams in all BCS conferences. Arizona State and UCLA are bad by any conferences standards. Oregon State, California, Oregon, Arizona, and Stanfard are mediocre/semi good teams. USC is the only legitimate T25 team in the conference.

I would take Oregon, Oregon St. CAL and Arizona over the bottom 8 or so teams in the top 25 right now. Easy.

Let's see I would definately take CAL over Maryland if the game is not being played at 9 am PST. Worst CAL has played all season. Oregon would smoke New Mexico, Arizona is undefeated at home so I would definately take them over any of those teams at home, you know the place where most SEC teams play their ooc games.

In Zona's loss vs New mexico they had 5 turnovers, and their best player did not play. It was an upset they happen.


Would you take last years LSU team over final unranked teams like Kentucky or Arkansas?

It is to point out the truth. To those simpletons that look soley at opponent winning percentage like CBS.com the Pro SEC site adn network. It does require just a little bit of critical thinking so at least half the people here would fall short of understanding.

6-1 against MWC

CAL actually owned from mid 3rd quarter on, they were in just too big of a hole. They were stupid to agree to play at that time just to be on TV.

Oregon St. was horrible at the beginning of the season, but have improved greatly since the game vs Hawaii. Zona, what can you say you don't have your best player and you turn the ball over 5 times on the road you are going to lose.


Now what happens if Alabama loses to Tennessee this week? I mean Tennessee lost to Ucla, what will that say about the SEC?

If it is TRUE what facts do you have to support that if PAC 10 teams schedule teams like the Big 12, Big 10, and SEC does they would have winning records and be ranked? I'm sorry Portland St., Northern Arizona, UNLV, San Jose St., New Mexico, Colorado St, Idaho, Toledo, Utah St. aren't exactly BCS caliper teams. Pac 10 already plays these teams and I'm not going to mention the Pac 10's record vs the MWC because everyone already knows. MWC is not a BCS conference and when those games were scheduled against the MWC none of them were ranked. Don't act like the Pac 10 doesn't schedule cup cakes. Their already playing them and still can't get more than one team in the Top 25. So what evidence do you have to support the fact that if the Pac 10 starts scheduling pansies AGAIN they would have a better record, be ranked, and be bowl eligible?

If a SEC team is travelling I'm somewhat disapointed when they chose to do so against a non bcs opponent... And no i'm not referring to the LSU/Tulane series... that's hardly much of a road trip... I'm talking about LSU's home/away against TCU lined up early next decade (2012 or 2013 i think)

Even considering the advantage in recruiting in Texas this may represent - I'd much rather LSU played in the house of a BCS opponent instead... if you are going to give up the revenue of a home stadium I want to see LSU on television at another big stadium (playing on the biggest possible stage)

No, I was just proving a point. That is why I posed it as a question. Teams can improve. Oregon St. for one is known for being a very slow starter, they had to replace all 7 starters from their front 7.

quote:

---

No, I was just proving a point. That is why I posed it as a question. Teams can improve.

---

You only prove your perspective is skewed if you try and apply one standard to one team and another to another team