Started By
Message

re: NFL bans players with domestic violence, sexual assault convictions from combine

Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:17 am to
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33943 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:17 am to
Why is domestic violence consider the same level offense as a sexual assault? That makes no sense.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14490 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:39 am to
So a multibillion dollar company with a serious image problem takes a huge step to clean up that image. Wtf is the problem? If you're convicted a beating a woman or raping a woman, they won't consider you for the 1st phase of the job interview process. Wtf is the problem? Wanna work for our company? Don't beat women. Seems pretty fricking logical to me. But wtf do I know?
This post was edited on 2/9/16 at 10:40 am
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14490 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Why is domestic violence consider the same level offense as a sexual assault? That makes no sense.
it's more of a line to cross than a level. They've established the line @ DV. Any separation beyond that is irrelevant. They didn't include murder in there, but it's implied.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25173 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:44 am to
quote:

depends on how the NFL wants to look at it. Is it charges


It doesn't depend. Arrests can't be used to take employment actions.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14490 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Arrests can't be used to take employment actions.
what do u mean by that? They can't fire u after only being arrested?
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82037 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:45 am to
Yeah I don't get the outrage, but
the NFL lacks consistency
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25173 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:47 am to
quote:

what do u mean by that? They can't fire u after only being arrested?



From the EEOC:

quote:

Difference Between Arrest Records and Conviction Records
The fact that an individual was arrested is not proof that he engaged in criminal conduct. Therefore, an individual's arrest record standing alone may not be used by an employer to take a negative employment action (e.g., not hiring, firing or suspending an applicant or employee). However, an arrest may trigger an inquiry into whether the conduct underlying the arrest justifies such action.

In contrast, a conviction record will usually be sufficient to demonstrate that a person engaged in particular criminal conduct. In certain circumstances, however, there may be reasons for an employer not to rely on the conviction record alone when making an employment decision.

Several states' laws limit employers' use of arrest and conviction records to make employment decisions. These laws may prohibit employers from asking about arrest records or require employers to wait until late in the hiring process to ask about conviction records. If you have questions about these kinds of laws, you should contact your state fair employment agency for more information.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14490 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:49 am to
Aaron Hernandez was booted before conviction, wasn't he?
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25173 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Aaron Hernandez was booted before conviction, wasn't he?


His situation was governed by the CBA. For instance:

quote:

There is language in the Collective Bargaining Agreement that allows teams to nullify contracts and recoup bonus money in the case of incarceration or other off-field transgressions


Since AH didn't miss any time because of his incarceration, he didn't have to return his signing bonus money, for instance.

Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79209 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:54 am to
quote:

yeah, I'm not really seeing the logic in this decision. These players have already been punished likely by both the state and by whatever team they played for. Now, the NFL is potentially trying to cause further detrimental damage to these players' future for conduct that occurred when they were not part of the NFL.


That's what I don't understand. You're giving a platform to current players to continue playing, yet the new guys don't even get a shot to get noticed at the combine.

Although I'm not a GM/scout, this has discriminatory practice written all over it. Plus, not many teams would take a 1st/2nd round chance on a guy that wasn't at the combine IMO
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82037 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:00 am to
quote:

These players have already been punished likely by both the state and by whatever team they played for.
If you beat a woman, get convicted and do time in prison. Are you going to tell the new companies you're applying for that you've served your time so it shouldn't matter?
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14490 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:04 am to
Ok, makes sense
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14490 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:05 am to
quote:

If you beat a woman, get convicted and do time in prison. Are you going to tell the new companies you're applying for that you've served your time so it shouldn't matter?
if u actually have to explain this, you're wasting your time. Lol
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25173 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:05 am to
quote:

If you beat a woman, get convicted and do time in prison. Are you going to tell the new companies you're applying for that you've served your time so it shouldn't matter?



I think that is exactly what you would sell to the employer. You are reformed which is the goal of prison.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14490 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:07 am to
quote:

think that is exactly what you would sell to the employer. You are reformed which is the goal of prison.
which my reply would be "prove it.....innnnnn CANADA"
Posted by AjaxFury
In & out of The Matrix
Member since Sep 2014
9928 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:10 am to
So if you wanted to fulfill your MYPLAYER MADDEN fantasy of joining your favorite team, pimp-slap your g/f, call the police on yourself....sign a 1 year deal for $1M/yr.

Then once you're on the Cowboys where you've always wanted to be, you can re-sign with them at the original rookie pay scale rate for where you would've been slotted in the draft.

Genius!
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
17967 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Well it seems like you can even beat a woman who isnt your SO as long as its classified as assault and not sexual assault.

De'Andre Johnson be like frick yeah

Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51680 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:17 am to
My friend got arrested 2 years ago and can't find a job because of background checks. He's still awaiting trial btw. Companies have told him straight up we can't hire you because you were arrested
Posted by Sprung
In between the cusions
Member since Apr 2008
1942 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:18 am to
They realize the only growth they can get is from women so they pander to their issues. Like changing the Rooney rule to also include a woman as well.
Posted by EyeoftheEldrick12
Member since Jul 2012
1949 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:34 am to
The NFL is turning into competitive ribbon dancing.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram