Started By
Message

re: NCAA Conference Realignment?

Posted on 8/7/14 at 9:13 pm to
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47550 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 9:13 pm to
Let me guess who the other four are... Princeton, Rutgers, Alabama, and Miami
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

I still think that the Big 12 will eventually add BYU, Cincinnati or Houston. UConn is the school thats in a tough spot.



BYU and Cinci make the most sense due to the markets. If WVU is going to be a long term member they need someone closer,
Posted by tccdc
Washington, DC
Member since Sep 2007
3574 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

quote: Yep. They shouldn't be, but they are. SEC = 14 ACC = 14 Big 10 = 14 PAC-12 = 12 Big XII = 10 ND = 1 Yeah, Notre freakin' Dame shouldn't be part of the powers...their own Network deal - 11 (Claimed) National Titles - (plus 11 other "Bama titles = 22 Bama Titles) - 7 Heisman winners, most famous coach in history, most renowned rivalry in CFB history - with most Heismans + All-Americans playing in that inter-sectional game) and one of only 5 schools you can't write the history of CFB w/o including them. But yeah...they should be treated like Boise State and BYU.


Did not realize Paul Bear Bryant coached at ND...

And ND relevance is continuing to decrease...about another generation and they will have hard decisions to make
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10666 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

BYU and Cinci make the most sense due to the markets. If WVU is going to be a long term member they need someone closer,



Cinci is Ohio State territory. If you add up the Kentucky, Indiana, Miami OH, Purdue, and ND fans in the Cinci market it will outnumber Bearcat fans.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

seems like BS, they should have to join a conference.



Yea the future of CFB is going to be 4 or 5 superconferences that only play each other with a true 8 team playoff. If they want in on that process, they need to become full members of a conference. It would be like the Cowboys in the NFL saying they are "independent" of any division or conference and want to make their own NFL schedule, yet they want to be included in the playoff system.
This post was edited on 8/7/14 at 9:45 pm
Posted by TU Rob
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2008
12737 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

But yeah...they should be treated like Boise State and BYU.


2012 was a fluke. Yes they have a following but the team is lucky to string together a 10 win season every now and then. I never said they should never be included. But status quo, they should be left out. Join a conference. ACC or Big 10 would take them. ACC sort of has already.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36110 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 9:42 pm to
quote:


Yea the future of CFB is going to be 4 or 5 superconferences that only play each other with a true 8 or 10 team playoff.



People seem to think this but I'm not sure it will be true. The SEC for example has only prestige and money to lose if the other conferences are granted increased equivalency in the eyes of the general public. Splitting the pie more equally between the major conferences is only an advantage if you in a conference with a lesser amount of pie.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 10:02 pm to
Yea Cinci is not ideal for anyone. But the Big 12 is by far the weakest of the Big 5 conferences and is only one big exit from collapse. It will need to expand to a minimum of 12 with a title game to stay relevant long term. BYU and Cinci seem like the only options out there. Maybe UCF instead of Cinci.

God what a horrible conference. It should really be disbanded and merged into the other power 4 conferences. Texas, TTU, OU, and OkSt to Pac 12. KU and ND to Big Ten. UCONN and WVU to ACC. The rest left out of the equation.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

And ND relevance is continuing to decrease


and yet they literally just went to a national title game, signed a brand new TV contract, and had 8 players selected in the 2014 NFL draft

Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

The SEC for example has only prestige and money to lose if the other conferences are granted increased equivalency in the eyes of the general public.


Disagree. The tougher the schedules get for the other conferences the more it benefits the SEC. What will hurt the SEC is us destroying each other while other big teams like Texas, FSU and USC play a joke schedule and go undefeated. The SEC will prove its superiority even more so if the playing field is leveled.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure it will be true


wont happen any time soon.

for what, 5 years now, we have delusionists claiming we'd have superconferences and every single year it doesnt happen.

with the new contract, it'll be at least 12 years before the idea even gets revisited.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
6602 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

for what, 5 years now, we have delusionists claiming we'd have superconferences and every single year it doesnt happen.


Huh? You've got a couple conferences already branching out to 14. When Texas can be wooed to the Pac 12 which already had legs, everything will be in place to have 4 16 team conferences.
Posted by Jefferson Davis
Plank Road
Member since Nov 2011
5960 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:25 pm to
Texas to the Pac 12, who would go with them? OU, OSU, and BYU?
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
6602 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:32 pm to
Not sure. There will be some geographic concerns for a couple of schools, but overall it should work. I mean it isn't like WVA in the B12 makes much sense.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36110 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:55 pm to
quote:


Disagree. The tougher the schedules get for the other conferences the more it benefits the SEC



Spell out how this is going to happen. Even assuming the ooc games become all BCS equivalent schools the majority of their schedule is still going to be made up of the schools from their conference. If you are the Big 12 or ACC there's just a lot of filler on that schedule even before you cherry pick your ooc opponents.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36110 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:58 pm to
quote:



Huh? You've got a couple conferences already branching out to 14. When Texas can be wooed to the Pac 12 which already had legs,



It had legs until Texas said no to profit sharing on an equal basis as a prerequisite for entry into the PAC. They made the wrong decision on that IMO, adding OU and Texas to the PAC would have meant a very strong PAC product that would have competed for viewership favorably with the Big 10 and SEC... now they have the LHN and a lousy conference they are locked into until their GOR agreement expires in more than a decade.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 12:15 am to
quote:

When Texas can be wooed to the Pac 12 which already had legs, everything will be in place to have 4 16 team conferences.


oh, so ten years from now? sweet dude
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 1:22 am to
quote:

Let me guess who the other four are... Princeton, Rutgers, Alabama, and Miami


What?

That's crazy talk.

Michigan (basically owned college football with ND before 1950.)

Oklahoma

USC

Notre Dame

Ohio State

(You can't ignore those)

Nebraska is on the cusp and so is Alabama...but Bama has a lot of controversy due to the segregated South and the South where they were total crap in football. They were.

I think Texas, Nebraska and Alabama and Florida State and Miami all have a story to tell and they are all somewhat even...but not greater than the ones about them.

The SEC sucked for so many years...White bread country-club football - sportswriters actually questioned once...if the South would ever produce a real football contender...(no offense, but it was considered sort of dogshite Boise State white boy stuff - it's why the South gleamed onto Bama...first team to get great recognition...through canny politicking and winning...Bama became the poster-child and saved the South in football.

So some of that challenge...became manufactured...There were real titles and real recognition. Like LSU in the 50's...a real title because most teams were still white.

But Bama won most of their shite when teams they didn't play were black. Bama won a lot of white on white titles - while ducking in bowl games - black opponents.

but later...a lot of titles that are sort of made up after the fact. I know Bama was pride of the South during the 60's and 70's to get the SEC some recognition after being considered a second-class conference...like the modern day WAC...with just white boys running around a field.

So Bama's pre-1980 history isn't so awesome - nor is the SEC.

SEC is king now...because (god forbid!) the African-American athlete came back from the North after the 1930's-40's-50's-60's - generation.

The reason the North was king in the 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's is the black southern athlete had gone West and North.

The West and Midwest was king.

Ohio State and Michigan and Michgan State...had the best athletes bar none for 30 years...but mostly USC - more All-Americans than anyone and not even close from 1960-1990. Kicked the shite out of Bama multiple times.

SEC was basically bullshite until the late 80's early 90's - just slow late-night crap - we used to get it on ESPN and you would watch games and say...why are these guys stuck in mud..

At that time Ohio State was fast...far faster than the SEC...Michigan was fast.

I remember watching on ESPN in the 80's...SEC was kind of considered like WAC in California. But without the talent of the WAC. Everyone seemed so slow and the football was so neanderthal...run up the middle, run up the middle, run up the middle.

Well things changed...Talent moved back South. So the SEC is far far far greater than it ever was under Bear Bryant's days - shite, that guy had it easy playing against weak competition everyday...

Saban is playing the country - full integration. Bryant had a rigged atmosphere that the rest of the country considered a joke, an affront, a blight on society and disregarded their accomplishments...see 1966. That's a statement - you all ain't playing real football white jokers. Because we just realized...hey, black guys are kind of better and if you avoid them...you kinda suck.

You can't write it without the true inventors...who played everyone...and won and won and have more Heismans, and far more All-Americans than anyone else...

These are the schools with the most titles, most all-americans, and most NFL draft picks by far and most prestige, etc.

Michigan
Notre Dame
USC
Ohio State
Oklahoma

You would have to mention these schools in talking about the history of college football.

Bear Bryant's time was brief...you could edit out the segregated years...and maybe give Bama two or three real titles over the years.

They are only a big deal in the South - never been a big deal outside. They stand for make believe titles...they stand for make believe re-telling and re-education of the Civil War that has gone on.

They stand for folderol and continued poppy-cock.

Why does the South have so much problems ever telling the truth about shite. Everything has to be hidden or white-washed.

Be a frickin' man and say...yeah, we weren't that great then but we're great now...because we accepted blacks and then dominate our teams...

And win everything...

And we're supposed to believe ALL-WHITE BAMA TEAMS WERE some great teams?

History lesson kids - they were Boise State of the 60's and 70's.

BEAR GOT A PASS FROM RACIST SPORTS WRITERS.

NOBODY WITH A BRAIN BELIEVED THOSE BAMA TEAMS WERE HALF AS GOOD AS INTEGRATED NORTHERN WEST COAST TEAMS. (Unless today, you still believe white guys are the best athletes alive - as people did believe back then.)

When not even half white teams can win shite today...but plenty of black teams were in college football during Bear's run as "great coach" who played against white teams"...but seemed to always be miserably killed and routed whenever he played an integrated team.

Why is that?

LINK

I don't mean to disparage the South - but c'mon?

The SEC was total bullshite in teh 1950's and 1960's...like playing Idaho State every week.

What a crock!

SEC is awesome now and they are king...but it hasn't been from the help of the local populace or fans...who tried to make it all-white...well the black families came back...and that black people you drove out - came back and now have made it the best conference.

But Alabama today is the best it's ever been...bar none - in terms of real talent and real victories.

Saban has the talent - Bryant - I think he was a great coach but he was working with half-arse talent and his titles are total frauds.

This post was edited on 8/8/14 at 1:34 am
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36110 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 2:21 am to
Your narrative IMO makes almost no sense and has almost nothing to do with the thread at hand or the future of college football. FWIW I would agree that Notre Dame deserves a place at the table and point out they are already playing a partial ACC schedule on top of still playing some other major "BCS" schools from around the country.

Your diatribe RE: Bama seems desirous of lionizing schools from around the country except the south and disparaging the southern schools in particular. But your argument makes no sense. The rest of the country was hardly integrated and Bama did quite well head to head against the schools from around the country especially in the PAC and Big 10 that you seem interested in representing as better and more integrated.

Interestingly enough schools that Alabama did very poorly against (prior to being integrated) were schools like TCU, Texas, and Rice that were still segregated. It is probably embarrassing for gumps to look back on being owned by the likes of all white Rice and TCU teams but it doesn't match the narrative that they padded their numbers against inferior athletes when they were really not exposed by playing "integrated" teams. It also really doesn't make sense to talk about schools from the PAC or Big 10 as if they were generally integrated or different either when most of the United States practiced segregation, discouraged and outlawed inter-racial relationships, and rarely had more than 1 or 2 black athletes on a single team.

Anyway, none of this nonsense has much of anything to do with the focus of this thread IMO.
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9240 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 5:53 am to
I firmly believe that this next round of expansion is coming. Once the specifics of this new autonomy sorts itself out, the few schools mentioned will absolutely be begging to get into the P5.

In regards to the Big 12, all the other conferences have 12 schools with a championship game. The new playoff selection committee has already stated numerous times that strength of schedule and championship games will be weighed heavily in their selection process. All its going to take is for the Big 12 to have one of their teams get passed over for a team from a conference with a championship game and then they will be expanding faster then you can spell it. Plus once they see the revenue these other conferences are pulling in, its only a matter of time. I really think that the Big 12 will eventually add BYU, Houston and Cincinnati. Expands their markets and brings in two average to above average programs. BYU has a great following and Cincinnati is a talent rich area. The chance for Texas and Oklahoma to get into the state of Ohio has to at least make them think about it. I alsot believe that darkhorse addition to the Big 12 is New Mexico. GROWING market with a quality Basketball and Baseball program. Football is on the rise. Thats one to watch out for.

North:

Oklahoma St
Kansas
Kansas St
Iowa St
West Virginia
Cincinnati*
BYU*

South:

Texas
Texas Tech
Oklahoma
TCU
Baylor
Houston*
New Mexico*

For the Big 12, thats about as good as it can get if you ask me. That would be a pretty balanced conference with the possibility of some good conference championship games. There really isnt much more they can do, other then fold and be absorbed by the other P5 conferences.
This post was edited on 8/8/14 at 6:13 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram