- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More impressive Goatbrook stat: 21 triple-doubles or 3 quadruple-doubles?
Posted on 1/19/17 at 12:51 pm to okietiger
Posted on 1/19/17 at 12:51 pm to okietiger
Yea only rockets fans don't like the guy 
he's way too passive aggressive for my liking. And a fake tough guy. Wears the camera man outfit to taunt Durant then when asked about it he denies it. Man up bro. You got beef own it.
he's way too passive aggressive for my liking. And a fake tough guy. Wears the camera man outfit to taunt Durant then when asked about it he denies it. Man up bro. You got beef own it.
0
Posted on 1/19/17 at 12:56 pm to Boomshockalocka
So, in your looney tune world, you're trying to punish a player for getting rebounds? You are clinically insane
Posted on 1/19/17 at 1:02 pm to AU_251
Your comprehension level is pretty low if that's what you're taking from this. Let me summarize this for you and see if you can get it this time.
Westbrook's calling card for winning an MVP is that he averages a triple double. Why are we valuing this triple double as the end all be all when he averages 10.6 rebounds per game, and MORE of his rebounds are uncontested than any other player. Why is that number 10.0 more important than 9.9 or 9.8? And why are his rebounds being valued the same as all other rebounds when his are uncontested at a higher rate than anyone elses? My main issue is with an arbitrary number "10 reb" in this case, being a deciding factor in the MVP race.
We never once "punished" a player for getting rebounds buy a clue homie.
Westbrook's calling card for winning an MVP is that he averages a triple double. Why are we valuing this triple double as the end all be all when he averages 10.6 rebounds per game, and MORE of his rebounds are uncontested than any other player. Why is that number 10.0 more important than 9.9 or 9.8? And why are his rebounds being valued the same as all other rebounds when his are uncontested at a higher rate than anyone elses? My main issue is with an arbitrary number "10 reb" in this case, being a deciding factor in the MVP race.
We never once "punished" a player for getting rebounds buy a clue homie.
This post was edited on 1/19/17 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 1/19/17 at 1:07 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
MORE of his rebounds are uncontested than any other player.
so, you're trying to penalize him for getting rebounds. like I said, that is insane.
quote:
Why is that number 10.0 more important than 9.9 or 9.8?
because it's higher.
quote:
buy a clue homie.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 1:09 pm to AU_251
That's not being penalized. It's called digging a little deeper and analyzing.
This post was edited on 1/19/17 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 1/19/17 at 1:11 pm to AU_251
This thread.
Holy fricking shite, Piñatashockalocka has outdone himself 
Holy fricking shite, Piñatashockalocka has outdone himself
Posted on 1/19/17 at 1:15 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Interesting choice of the word piñata.
Because when a clumsy person (ie Spurs fan) show up and tries to a take a shot at hitting a piñata ...
What you will get more times than not is a swing and a miss and people laughing at your clumsy arse. And that's what your posts are known for. You you right. I am piñata. And it's Because when you try to land one its a swing and miss.
Because when a clumsy person (ie Spurs fan) show up and tries to a take a shot at hitting a piñata ...
What you will get more times than not is a swing and a miss and people laughing at your clumsy arse. And that's what your posts are known for. You you right. I am piñata. And it's Because when you try to land one its a swing and miss.
This post was edited on 1/19/17 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 1/19/17 at 1:33 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
What you will get more times than not is a swing and a miss and people laughing at your clumsy arse. And that's what your posts are known for. You you right. I am piñata. And it's Because when you try to land one its a swing and miss.
this should be chiseled on the walls of some great, historically significant establishment
Posted on 1/19/17 at 1:40 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
What you will get more times than not is a swing and a miss and people laughing at your clumsy arse. And that's what your posts are known for. You you right. I am piñata. And it's Because when you try to land one its a swing and miss.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 1:51 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:Welp, someone found them a new sig quote.
You you right. I am piñata
Posted on 1/19/17 at 1:55 pm to shel311
When caveman fan shows up with a Bandana over his eyes(see: clueless basketball fan) the result is an oft-embarrassing swing n miss. Hey it fits.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:24 pm to Boomshockalocka
You tried WAY too hard there, son
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:59 pm to Boomshockalocka
You got wrecked itt boomie. Take the L bro.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 3:02 pm to td01241
T this may be one of my best threads ever. I took on nearly the whole thread and clearly won. In the first page there were a few guys agreeing with me but for the most part it was 1 v all.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 3:05 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
I took on nearly the whole thread and clearly won
Posted on 1/19/17 at 3:09 pm to monkeybutt
I posted that his rebounds are uncontested and not as valuable then I backed it up with data and a well written article.
I posted that all turnovers aren't created equal. Then backed it up with data and a well written article.
Nobody has really done anything close to disproving anything I posted.
I posted that all turnovers aren't created equal. Then backed it up with data and a well written article.
Nobody has really done anything close to disproving anything I posted.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 3:16 pm to Boomshockalocka
Yes today was clearly your best work. I especially enjoyed the analogy of a Spurs fan to that of a clumsy cave man. Spot on. Only a cave man could be a fan of a team that wins 5 titles in the last two decades. Spurs fans should be ashamed of themselves. I'm surprised they even are on this board to be honest, what with their small pea brains.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 3:22 pm to monkeybutt
I wasnt talking about that. I am talking about the thread topic. Not the piñata and all that nonsense. On the thread topic (Westbrook/rebounding/triple doubles) i dominated and everyone who read this thread learned a little about the value of uncontested rebounds and turnovers.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 3:27 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
this may be one of my best threads ever. I took on nearly the whole thread and clearly won.
U so rite, bum
Posted on 1/19/17 at 3:29 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
read this thread learned
we didn't learn anything new. What we were reminded of is that you will use anything, no matter how asinine or retarded, to try and say you "won". Literally NOBODY outside of you care about an "uncontested rebound stat". Or that "all TO's aren't created equal". Harden has plenty more TO's than Westbrook, and plenty LESS rebounds.
Now, those two facts couldn't shed light onto why you would come up with such ridiculous theories, could it? COULD IT BOOM, COULD IT
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News