Started By
Message

re: Mike Tyson vs "Hurricane" Peter McNeeley (Aug 19, 1995)

Posted on 10/16/14 at 11:43 am to
Posted by DakForHe15man
Member since Sep 2014
1519 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 11:43 am to
If Hurricane Peter McNeeley couldnt throw a punch or take a punch then why was he 36-1 & #7 in the world at the time of this match? I mean, I don't know much about boxing but that sounds pretty dang good.
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8625 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Part of his decline was simply that he didn't have what it takes to be great--neither the mental strength not the work ethic.


I disagree with this. Tyson in his prime had a great work ethic. Now, mentally, he was always up and down.
I think that is where Cus came in. He helped keep Tyson calm and focused. Also swept up the little things he did away from boxing.

I agree he was an enabler, but he did keep him in line. Without him, Tyson was free to run wild and King and all of his people got their hooks in fully.

To me, I consider Tyson to be one of the greatest What If's of boxing history along with Ali.


Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68140 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:10 pm to
Just one of the many tomato cans Tyson faced in his career. I didn't watch because I wasn't going to pay for that joke of a fight just like those garbage bouts against Seldon, Mathis and Bruno.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68140 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 1:05 pm to
McNeely had fought a bunch of nobodies to that point. If I recall correctly, he wasn't rated until there was legitimate talk of his being the comeback opponent for Tyson. The various commissions are corrupt and often create bullshite rankings to help the interest in a fight.
This post was edited on 10/16/14 at 1:08 pm
Posted by mperry4
Indiana
Member since Oct 2011
121 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 1:41 pm to
Bruno is probably right but it doesnt sound right for some reason. (Im getting old)
Posted by mperry4
Indiana
Member since Oct 2011
121 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 1:45 pm to
I think the young Tyson in his prime would have been outsmarted by the KO's or by Lewis in their primes. And the older Tyson wouldn't have had the swiftness or power to knock them out with a couple of punches. Maybe Wladimir but I still doubt it. Wladimir wasn't in his prime when he got knocked out by the single punches.

I really believe that the current champs (Mayweather, Klitschkos) are among the greatest fighters in their class of all time, but they're not "fun" to watch so they get no credit or love. Just my two cents.


To be honest I have not watched any boxing in a few years. I have caught a few fights on HBO but nobody of note. I have heard of Klitchko but never have seen him so my opinion was just based on what I think Tyson could do. Anyone that has seen the others box would definately know more about it than I would.
Posted by DakForHe15man
Member since Sep 2014
1519 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

McNeely had fought a bunch of nobodies to that point. If I recall correctly, he wasn't rated until there was legitimate talk of his being the comeback opponent for Tyson. The various commissions are corrupt and often create bull shite rankings to help the interest in a fight.


Oh ok. That makes sense. Thnks.
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37134 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 2:10 pm to
Would have been interesting had Tyson not gone to prison in the middle of his prime. Tyson lacked discipline but was captivating to watch. You had to watch. It's funny to remember how big boxing (heavyweight) was then. I do miss that run, but maybe the 'reality show before reality shows' Tyson kept us engrossed over the matches. What a fun era of boxing.

It's funny to also think back to his video game and the Tyson character was just like real life. Get past the first minute or two and fight with discipline and you beat him.
Posted by kidbourbon
Member since Jul 2009
1306 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Remember it well. I spent the money on the PPV. Dont remember how much it was. Tyson in his prime and before Don King I don't think was beatable. He knew defense and could take anyone out with one punch. He also knew how to box though whick I think a lot of people didnt realize.


Huh? Don King infiltrated Tyson after the Spinks fight. Which was the end of his prime, btw.
Posted by kidbourbon
Member since Jul 2009
1306 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Would have been interesting had Tyson not gone to prison in the middle of his prime.


As soon as he fired Kevin Rooney his career was effectively over.
Posted by kidbourbon
Member since Jul 2009
1306 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

It's also popular to say if Cus hadn't died, then .... But Cus wasn't able to control Tyson; he was an enabler who pacified Tyson and contributed to making him a ticking timebomb. Eventually, he'd crack--Cus or no Cus.


False.

He may have been a time bomb, but he was fine without Cus so long as he had the support system that Cus had put in place for him.


quote:

Tyson was a head-hunting mental midget who didn't have the discipline to work a fighter's body when necessary (see the Bonecrusher Smith fight), nor the patience to wear down a fighter who wouldn't just cower in fear. He was a bully who crumbled every time someone stood up to him.


Nonsense, nonsense, nonsense. Literally nothing could be further from the truth. You can't make a fighter more technical than Tyson. The style that Cus taught him and Rooney reinforced was crazy technical. Constant bobbing and weaving and ducking all while ruthlessly attacking. It was a built-in defense mechanism. It was Cus' peek-a-boo style, and Tyson was put on this earth to fight with that style and Cus knew it.

I'm not writing anymore, because you are helpless on this subject based on what I've quoted alone.
Posted by Jamohn
Das Boot
Member since Mar 2009
13544 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

The style that Cus taught him and Rooney reinforced was crazy technical. Constant bobbing and weaving and ducking all while ruthlessly attacking. It was a built-in defense mechanism. It was Cus' peek-a-boo style, and Tyson was put on this earth to fight with that style and Cus knew it.
This is not inconsistent with what I said.
quote:

I'm not writing anymore, because you are helpless on this subject based on what I've quoted alone.
It seems that you lack both reading comprehension and intelligence. Quite the dangerous debater there.
Posted by mperry4
Indiana
Member since Oct 2011
121 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 2:49 pm to
Huh? Don King infiltrated Tyson after the Spinks fight. Which was the end of his prime, btw.

Sorry thats what I meant. I don't remember it being after the Spinks fight. I though it was before.
Posted by kidbourbon
Member since Jul 2009
1306 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Sorry thats what I meant. I don't remember it being after the Spinks fight. I though it was before.


It was before, but it wasn't until after the Spinks fight that he fired Rooney. Which was the effective end for him.

Firing Bill Cayton may have come before the Spinks fight, but he could have gone on and been fine as a fighter without Cayton. Rooney was the guy he needed. Rooney was the guy who knew how to train him in the way he'd been taught to fight since he was 13.

See, here's the deal, and this sounds like a trivial point, but it's not. Fighting the way Tyson did in all the fights up to and including that Spinks fight (i.e. the style that Cus taught him). It isn't a natural thing. You don't naturally constantly bob and weave and duck and twist and throw combinations like that. That shite is taught and then reinforced through hours of muscle memory in the gym or it goes away and you just resort to trying to land single knockout punches.

I used to box myself and I can attest to that. The way you move in a boxing ring -- both with footwork (though some people have more natural footwork than others) and upper body movements and throwing combinations as a rule -- is very much a reinforced through practice thing. And especially a style like Tyson's that was so hypertechnical, and especially with a guy like Tyson who was both perfectly designed to fight that style and completley reliant on doing the same.

Tyson was a short fighter, and so he needed to fight the way that Cus taught or he wasn't going to be worth a shite. When you saw Buster Douglas knock him out, or when you saw Lennox Lewis whup his arse for 8 rounds, you saw a guy just walking straight into punches That's not how Tyson fought in his prime (i.e being trained by Cus/Rooney). The only way he could fight was to fight like he did, which was pretty much an exaggerated (and better, because Tyson was more athletic, quick, balanced, and strong than Frazier) version of the way Joe Frazier fought (and, yes, I know Cus trained Floyd Patterson, but Patterson's phsical build was so different from Tyson's that he fought Cus' style in a way that barely resembled Tyson. Frazier is the better analog.)

Can you imagine what a Frazier/Ali fight would have looked like had Joe not been constantly bobbing and weaving. It would have been over by round 5.

And now this is probably where you might say: "okay, but why is it that Tyson needed a specific trainer to be able to fight that way?". And the answer is because Tyson was a freaking lunatic drug addict hyper sex fiend with no discipline whatsoever and who wasn't going to answer to anybody because nobody was going to attempt to be anything other than a "yes man" to Tyson.

So, yes, Tyson was fatally flawed, and maybe doomed to go down the road he went down later even if it hadn't been sooner. But Tyson's boxing style was not fatally flawed. It was technical and ferocious and amazing. And the popular saying that "Tyson got beat because somebody finally stood up to him" is the biggest simpleton load of crap on the planet. Tyson got beat because he fired Kevin Rooney and stopped training properly and stopped fighting like Tyson, and was thus rendered a 5-10 dude walking straight into jabs.

There's no single argument in sports that is more lazy and completely bunk than the nonsense notion spouted off (and as characterized in the above paragraph) by the guy I already called out, and thousands of other simpleton minions just like him.
This post was edited on 10/16/14 at 3:50 pm
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41178 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

This is my favorite thing from that whole ordeal.

McNeeley vs. Pizza


McNeeley's manager's share of the purse for the fight was withheld by the Nevada commission, but the manager made 110K from the Pizza hut commercial & another 40K from AOL an ad.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51626 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 6:23 pm to
Just rewatched it, horrible stoppage.
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
72931 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

Either of the Klitschkos in their prime would beat Tyson in his prime. Same for Lennox Lewis.


Posted by NHTIGER
Central New Hampshire
Member since Nov 2003
16188 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 6:42 pm to
After the Tyson loss, McNeely was beaten by Butterbean in the first round.

On McNeely's plus side, he once knocked a guy out with one punch just SIX SECONDS into the first round.

I remember when I was kid how excited everyone up this way was when McNeely's dad fought Floyd Patterson for the heavyweight championship.

The Walgreen robbery was in Massachusetts, not in Miami as someone posted earlier. He served little or no time as the getaway driver and has been frequently seen in the Boston area for the last several years.
Posted by KBeezy
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2004
13529 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 3:08 am to
Where did ya box?
Posted by kidbourbon
Member since Jul 2009
1306 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 6:05 am to
quote:

Where did ya box?


Knoxville Golden Gloves.

Ace Miller, the guy who ran it -- but who recently passed -- was a fairly well known trainer. https://www.knoxnews.com/sports/legendary-local-boxing-promoter-ace-miller-dies. He was Big John Tate's trainer, and worked with various other guys on more of a short term basis. Tommy Morrison, for example, trained there before the Foreman fight.

I loved that place. It was such an old school boxing gym (I assume it still exists, to be clear).

Illustrative Anecdote: there was this middle-aged black guy who went by "BT" who would come to the gym for a few hours every night. He would work out, and when he wasn't working out he would be hanging around the gym laughing and shooting the breeze with the guys who worked there. He was overtly nice -- I'd occasionally ask if he would do a few rounds on the mits with me, and he never once declined. Anyway, I figured he was just some guy who had boxed a little bit when he was younger who hung out at the gym just because he didn't have anywhere better to hang out.

It was like two years before I learned his name was Bernard Taylor: (a) one of the most decorated amateur fighters in U.S. boxing history, who (b) was heavily favored to win the Gold Medal in the '80 Olympics had we not boycotted (Ace Miller was the coach of that team, btw), and who (c) had a pretty decent pro career as well -- was NABF featherweight champion and USBF super featherweight champion for a time. And retired with a record of 49-4-2.

Anyway, I just thought that was cool. I feel like every old school boxing gym like that has some unassuming guy who hangs out every night at the gym, maybe helping kids with their equipment if they need it, but otherwise just chilling and blending in.....who just happened to be a world class boxer back in his day. Bernard Taylor Wiki
This post was edited on 10/17/14 at 6:09 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram